{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,25]],"date-time":"2026-05-25T13:04:38Z","timestamp":1779714278363,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]],"date-time":"2026-05-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779321600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100015550","name":"Italian Ministry of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Ricerca Corrente Annual Program 2027"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Ricerca Corrente Annual Program 2027"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100015550","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Medicina"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background and Objectives: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is an emergent condition managed by surgical intervention. No conclusive evidence has been produced regarding the need for drain placement after primary repair. Our meta-analysis aimed to provide insight into the short-term outcomes by comparing the two strategies of drain omission or intra-operative placement of at least one drain. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed\/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were utilized to identify articles of interest. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan Version 5.4. Eligible studies were comparative studies (RCTs and observational studies) enrolling adult patients (\u226518 years) undergoing emergency primary repair for PPU, with or without prophylactic intra-abdominal drain placement; case reports and series of fewer than 10 patients were excluded. The literature search covered January 2010 to 22 February 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs, and the ROBINS-I V2 tool for observational studies; certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE framework. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random-effects model and expressed as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Results: Five studies were considered for comparison, for a total of 1354 patients (744 and 610 in the drain and no-drain groups, respectively). Three were randomized controlled trials, and two were retrospective cohort studies, conducted across four countries (India, the USA, Egypt, and Japan). Meta-analysis of the pooled results showed that drain omission was associated with a shorter length of stay (LOS) (MD \u22122.13, 95% CI [\u22123.91\u2013\u22120.35], p &lt; 0.0001) and a lower rate of superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) (16.7% vs. 52.7%, OR 0.24, 95%CI [0.11\u20130.55], p = 0.0007). No difference was observed regarding the rate of leaks, reoperation, or deep SSIs. Low-certainty evidence suggested higher postoperative mortality in the no-drain group (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.10 to 3.48; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%), largely driven by retrospective studies with a high risk of bias. This mortality finding is of very low certainty and is most likely attributable to confounding in the observational studies rather than a true causal effect of drain omission. Several outcomes were based on data from only two to three studies, and the overall certainty of evidence was low to very low. Conclusions: Drain omission after primary repair for PPU may be associated with better outcomes in terms of LOS and superficial SSIs, primarily in lower-acuity patients, as reflected by the inclusion criteria of the contributing RCTs. Pooled analysis showed a higher postoperative mortality in the no-drain group; however, given the significant biases among included studies, our results should be interpreted as non-causal and thus require careful interpretation. Further research encompassing the full clinical spectrum of PPU is needed to confirm our results. Evidence certainty was low to very low across all outcomes, primarily due to a risk of bias, high heterogeneity (I2 up to 95% for LOS), indirectness, and imprecision.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina62051003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]],"date-time":"2026-05-21T15:02:27Z","timestamp":1779375747000},"page":"1003","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Perioperative Outcomes of No-Drain Strategy in Primary Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"62","author":[{"given":"Lorenzo","family":"Dell\u2019Atti","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unit\u00e0 Sanitaria Locale\u2014IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9841-7856","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maurizio","family":"Zizzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unit\u00e0 Sanitaria Locale\u2014IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9140-0488","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrea","family":"Morini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unit\u00e0 Sanitaria Locale\u2014IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Federica","family":"Mereu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unit\u00e0 Sanitaria Locale\u2014IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0217-6523","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marco","family":"Scarpa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General Surgery, 3rd Division, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3463-6659","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Quoc Riccardo","family":"Bao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General Surgery, 3rd Division, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Silvia","family":"Negro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General Surgery, 3rd Division, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2789-2470","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emanuele Damiano Luca","family":"Urso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General Surgery, 3rd Division, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4683-9691","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dario","family":"Parini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, AULSS 5 Polesana, 45100 Rovigo, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5102-0210","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Massimiliano","family":"Fabozzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unit\u00e0 Sanitaria Locale\u2014IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tan, R., Zhao, D., Zhang, X., Liu, T., Han, C., Li, Z., Qi, C., and Wang, Z. (2025). Gender and Age Differences in the Global Burden of Peptic Ulcers: An Analysis Based on GBD Data from 1990 to 2021. Front. Med., 12.","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2025.1586270"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.7704\/kjhugr.2024.0072","article-title":"Etiology and Therapeutic Strategies for Refractory Peptic Ulcers: A Comprehensive Review","volume":"25","author":"Park","year":"2025","journal-title":"Korean J. Helicobacter Up. Gastrointest. Res."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2009.03960.x","article-title":"Systematic Review: The Global Incidence and Prevalence of Peptic Ulcer Disease","volume":"29","author":"Sung","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-011-1482-1","article-title":"Trends in Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer","volume":"15","author":"Thorsen","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Gastrointest. Surg."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.6724","article-title":"Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Review","volume":"160","author":"Arshad","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA Surg."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00276-7","article-title":"Perforated Peptic Ulcer","volume":"386","author":"Soreide","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1159\/000264653","article-title":"Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review of History and Treatment","volume":"27","author":"Bertleff","year":"2010","journal-title":"Dig. Surg."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vidovi\u0107, S., Borovi\u0107, S., Ba\u0161kovi\u0107, M., Marki\u0107, J., and Pogoreli\u0107, Z. (2025). Perforated Peptic Ulcers in Children: A Systematic Review. BMC Pediatr., 25.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12887-025-05725-2"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000004561","article-title":"Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: What You Need to Know","volume":"99","author":"Rasslan","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Trauma Acute Care Surg."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2025.04.038","article-title":"Surgical Mortality and Morbidity Predictors in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Cohort Study","volume":"312","author":"Pouroushaninia","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Surg. Res."},{"key":"ref_11","first-page":"e94492","article-title":"Optimizing Surgical Drain Removal: A Narrative Review of Timing, Criteria, and Evidence-Based Practices","volume":"17","author":"Salib","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref_12","first-page":"CD010583","article-title":"Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage for Pancreatic Surgery","volume":"2025","author":"Miao","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2006.00999.x","article-title":"Drainage or Nondrainage in Elective Colorectal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","volume":"8","author":"Karliczek","year":"2006","journal-title":"Color. Dis."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., and The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med., 6.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-016-0384-4","article-title":"Rayyan\u2014A Web and Mobile App for Systematic Reviews","volume":"5","author":"Ouzzani","year":"2016","journal-title":"Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"Sterne, J.A.C., Higgins, J.P.T., Elbers, R.G., and Reeves, B.C. (2024, February 01). The Development Group for ROBINS-I. Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I): Detailed Guidance, Version 2 (Draft). Available online: https:\/\/www.riskofbias.info\/welcome\/robins-i-v2."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"(2025, February 01). GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software]. McMaster University and Evidence Prime. Available online: https:\/\/www.gradepro.org."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wan, X., Wang, W., Liu, J., and Tong, T. (2014). Estimating the Sample Mean and Standard Deviation from the Sample Size, Median, Range and\/or Interquartile Range. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 14.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135"},{"key":"ref_20","unstructured":"Higgins, J.P.T., and Deeks, J.J. (2025, March 19). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chapter 7: Selecting Studies and Collecting Data. [Version 5.1.0]. Available online: https:\/\/handbook-5-1.cochrane.org\/chapter_7\/table_7_7_a_formulae_for_combining_groups.htm."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1879","DOI":"10.1177\/00031348211056263","article-title":"Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Leak after Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Operative Repair","volume":"87","author":"Lund","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am. Surg."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-024-02551-6","article-title":"No Drains versus Drains after Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial","volume":"50","author":"Nageeb","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-017-4211-4","article-title":"Impact of Drain Insertion After Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair in a Japanese Nationwide Database Analysis","volume":"42","author":"Okumura","year":"2018","journal-title":"World J. Surg."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.5455\/jeim.201111.or.015","article-title":"Is There a Role of Abdominal Drainage in Primarily Repaired Perforated Peptic Ulcers?","volume":"2","author":"Ansari","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Exp. Integr. Med."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20200287","article-title":"Role of Drains in Cases of Peptic Ulcer Perforations: Comparison between Single Drain versus No Drain","volume":"7","author":"Kumar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. Surg. J."},{"key":"ref_26","first-page":"e91206","article-title":"Epidemiology and Outcomes of Peptic Ulcer Perforation: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study From a Tertiary Care Hospital in India","volume":"17","author":"Murmu","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9175","article-title":"Surgical Delay Is a Critical Determinant of Survival in Perforated Peptic Ulcer","volume":"100","author":"Buck","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br. J. Surg."},{"key":"ref_28","unstructured":"Higgins, J.P.T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M.J., and Welch, V. (2024). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; Version 6.5 (Updated August 2024), Cochrane. Available online: www.cochrane.org\/handbook."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7429","article-title":"Multicentre Trial of a Perioperative Protocol to Reduce Mortality in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Perforation","volume":"98","author":"Moller","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br. J. Surg."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-002-0331-9","article-title":"Morbidity and Mortality of Perforated Peptic Gastroduodenal Ulcer Following Emergency Surgery","volume":"387","author":"Kujath","year":"2002","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch. Surg."},{"key":"ref_31","first-page":"759","article-title":"Omental Patch Repair of Large Perforated Peptic Ulcers \u226525 Mm Is Associated with Higher Leak Rate","volume":"7","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clin. Transl. Res."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gupta, S., Kaushik, R., Sharma, R., and Attri, A. (2005). The Management of Large Perforations of Duodenal Ulcers. BMC Surg., 5.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2482-5-15"},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000003799","article-title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Omental Patch Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer","volume":"94","author":"Chan","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Trauma Acute Care Surg."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6058-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: An English National Population-Based Cohort Study","volume":"32","author":"Leusink","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg. Endosc."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"zrae163","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrae163","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Systematic Scoping Review and in-Depth Evaluation of Existing Evidence","volume":"9","author":"Chalmers","year":"2025","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["Medicina"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/62\/5\/1003\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,25]],"date-time":"2026-05-25T12:37:09Z","timestamp":1779712629000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/62\/5\/1003"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["medicina62051003"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina62051003","relation":{},"ISSN":["1648-9144"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1648-9144","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]]}}}