{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T10:18:23Z","timestamp":1787653103613,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787616000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Medicina"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical, functional, and graft-related outcomes of two tibial fixation constructs used in primary hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): tibial cortical button fixation and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation reinforced with a U-shaped staple. Materials and Methods: This retrospective two-center comparative cohort study included 58 patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament injuries who underwent primary ACLR and had a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months. Patients were classified into the cortical button group (n = 26) or the U-staple group (n = 32) according to the initial graft diameter, which strictly dictated the tibial fixation construct documented in the operative report. Both the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were used in each group. A shorter quadrupled graft construct was prepared in the cortical button group, whereas a longer doubled graft construct was used in the U-staple group. Donor-site pain measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), graft diameter, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, knee range of motion (ROM), Lachman and pivot-shift findings, and graft failure were compared between the groups. Graft failure was defined as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of graft discontinuity or insufficiency accompanied by grade 2\u20133 Lachman laxity or a positive pivot-shift test. Numerical variables were analyzed using the Mann\u2013Whitney U test, whereas categorical variables were compared using the Pearson chi-square or Fisher\u2019s exact test, as appropriate. Results: Donor-site pain was significantly higher in the cortical button group than in the U-staple group [median VAS score: 2.5 (2.0\u20134.0) vs. 2.0 (0\u20132.0), respectively; p = 0.007]. Graft diameter was also significantly greater in the cortical button group [10.0 mm (10.0\u201310.0) vs. 9.0 mm (8.0\u20139.0); p &lt; 0.001]. In contrast, IKDC scores were significantly higher in the U-staple group [71.0 (51.5\u201378.0) vs. 60.0 (55.0\u201362.8); p = 0.017]. No significant differences were observed in Lysholm scores (p = 0.701), knee ROM (p = 0.508), positive pivot-shift findings (11.5% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.648), clinically relevant Lachman laxity (30.8% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.287), or graft failure rates (11.5% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.495). Conclusions: No significant between-group differences were observed in Lysholm scores, knee ROM, clinical stability, or graft failure rates after hamstring autograft ACLR. The U-staple group demonstrated lower donor-site pain and higher IKDC scores, whereas the cortical button group had larger graft diameters, likely reflecting the shorter quadrupled graft configuration. Overall, neither tibial fixation construct showed a consistent advantage across all clinical outcomes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina62091629","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T09:04:30Z","timestamp":1787648670000},"page":"1629","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of Tibial Cortical Button Fixation and Bioabsorbable Interference Screw Plus U-Staple Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"62","author":[{"given":"Oktay","family":"Polat","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sultanbeyli State Hospital, Istanbul 34935, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6805-2745","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Berk","family":"Koncal\u0131o\u011flu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sultanbeyli State Hospital, Istanbul 34935, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mehmet","family":"Kuyumcu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sultanbeyli State Hospital, Istanbul 34935, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0126-1256","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emrecan","family":"Akg\u00fcn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sultanbeyli State Hospital, Istanbul 34935, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-8498-7462","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mohammed N. M.","family":"Ziara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics and Traumatology, Marmara University, Istanbul 34899, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9489-7979","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dursun","family":"Artvin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics and Traumatology, Marmara University, Istanbul 34899, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sadret Mert","family":"\u00c7\u0131nar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics and Traumatology, Marmara University, Istanbul 34899, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2452-1954","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Osman Mert","family":"Topkar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics and Traumatology, Marmara University, Istanbul 34899, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465000280052501","article-title":"Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction","volume":"28","author":"Brand","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465030310020501","article-title":"The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: Tibial site","volume":"31","author":"Kousa","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546504268036","article-title":"The influence of supplementary tibial fixation on laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons in female patients","volume":"33","author":"Hill","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2309499017699743","DOI":"10.1177\/2309499017699743","article-title":"Tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction","volume":"25","author":"Teo","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0044-1786007","article-title":"The Effect of Supplementary Staple Fixation on Biomechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Graft Tibial Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","volume":"37","author":"Demirel","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Knee Surg."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e70390","DOI":"10.1002\/jeo2.70390","article-title":"Impact of tibial supplementary fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for soft tissue auto and allografts: Modest enhancement in stability and increased incidence of pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"12","author":"Zheng","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Exp. Orthop."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fu, C.W., Chen, W.C., and Lu, Y.C. (2020). Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 21.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-020-03471-3"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lai, P.J., Wong, C.C., Chang, W.P., Liaw, C.K., Chen, C.H., and Weng, P.W. (2022). Comparison of two different types of hybrid Tibial fixations for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective comparative cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-06057-3"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1927","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465241254048","article-title":"ACL Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Semitendinosus Versus Double-Stranded Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autograft: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study","volume":"52","author":"Mo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_10","first-page":"e9","article-title":"Quadrupled Semitendinosus ACL Reconstruction Combining Cortical Button in Femur and Interference Screw in Tibia","volume":"9","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arthrosc. Tech"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23259671221096107","DOI":"10.1177\/23259671221096107","article-title":"Evaluation of Tibial Fixation Devices for Quadrupled Hamstring ACL Reconstruction","volume":"10","author":"Ammann","year":"2022","journal-title":"Orthop. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465211070291","article-title":"Suspensory Versus Interference Tibial Fixation of Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry","volume":"50","author":"Rahardja","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2017.1406243","article-title":"Graft fixation influences revision risk after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts","volume":"89","author":"Persson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Orthop."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-016-4135-9","article-title":"Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: A comparison of two tibial fixation methods","volume":"25","author":"Carulli","year":"2017","journal-title":"Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1858","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546511406234","article-title":"Tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized study comparing metal interference screw and staples with a centrally placed polyethylene screw and sheath","volume":"39","author":"Scholes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.11.024","article-title":"Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft","volume":"28","author":"Magnussen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1475","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546516634011","article-title":"The Effect of Autologous Hamstring Graft Diameter on the Likelihood for Revision of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","volume":"44","author":"Spragg","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1812","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.18.01467","article-title":"Graft Diameter and Graft Type as Predictors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision: A Cohort Study Including 18,425 Patients from the Swedish and Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registries","volume":"101","author":"Svantesson","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23259671241305427","DOI":"10.1177\/23259671241305427","article-title":"Is There a Hamstring Autograft Diameter Threshold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?","volume":"13","author":"Mirzayan","year":"2025","journal-title":"Orthop. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3161","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465231219966","article-title":"Lysholm and KOOS QoL Demonstrate High Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials","volume":"52","author":"Abed","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1007\/s001670050140","article-title":"Sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score. A prospective study of 120 ACL reconstructed patients with a 2-year follow-up","volume":"7","author":"Risberg","year":"1999","journal-title":"Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2632","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546518786476","article-title":"Increased Postoperative Manual Knee Laxity at 2 Years Results in Inferior Long-term Subjective Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","volume":"46","author":"Sundemo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2492071651","article-title":"Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts: MR imaging features at long-term follow-up--correlation with functional and clinical evaluation","volume":"249","author":"Saupe","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100801","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asmr.2023.100801","article-title":"Various Definitions of Failure Are Used in Studies of Patients Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","volume":"5","author":"Aldag","year":"2023","journal-title":"Arthrosc. Sports Med. Rehabil."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3053","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465221119787","article-title":"Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Zhao","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am. J. Sports Med."}],"container-title":["Medicina"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/62\/9\/1629\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T09:19:44Z","timestamp":1787649584000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/62\/9\/1629"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["medicina62091629"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina62091629","relation":{},"ISSN":["1648-9144"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1648-9144","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]]}}}