{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,14]],"date-time":"2026-09-14T05:02:33Z","timestamp":1789362153489,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788998400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Medicina"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background and Objectives: Clinicians often default to the narrower short peripheral catheter (SPC), believing wider catheters to be more painful and harder to insert. One previous randomized trial found no difference, but it neither selected patients by measured access risk nor interpreted the result against a prespecified threshold of clinical importance. We conducted a confirmatory trial addressing both, comparing 18-gauge and 20-gauge SPCs in adult emergency department patients at low-to-moderate risk of difficult access. Materials and Methods: In a single-center, parallel-group superiority randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07629427), adults with an Adult Difficult Intravenous Access (A-DIVA) score from 0 to 3 were allocated to an 18-gauge or a 20-gauge SPC by block randomization. Patients were blinded by goggles until dressing, and the data analyst was also blinded. Co-primary outcomes were patient-reported pain and nurse-reported procedural difficulty on 100 mm visual analog scales immediately after the first attempt; first-attempt success was secondary. The trial was powered for a 13 mm difference in pain. Results: In total, 204 patients were randomized, 102 per group. Median pain was 32.5 vs. 30.5 mm (median difference 1 mm, 95% CI \u22124 to 6; p = 0.65) and median procedural difficulty was 12.0 vs. 15.0 mm (\u22121 mm, 95% CI \u22124 to 1; p = 0.28). The first attempt succeeded in 92.2% and 90.2% of patients (absolute risk difference 2.0 percentage points, 95% CI \u22125.8 to 9.7; p = 0.62); no prespecified subgroup showed a treatment interaction. Conclusions: In adults at low-to-moderate risk of difficult intravenous access, we did not detect a difference between 18-gauge and 20-gauge SPCs in terms of insertion pain, procedural difficulty, or first-attempt success, and the confidence interval for pain lay well within the minimum clinically important difference. Formal equivalence was not tested; the trial was designed to detect superiority. SPC size can therefore be chosen on the anticipated therapy rather than the expected discomfort.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina62091747","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T15:54:19Z","timestamp":1789055659000},"page":"1747","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A Comparison of 18-Gauge and 20-Gauge Short Peripheral Catheters in Terms of Pain and Procedural Difficulty: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Emergency Department"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"62","author":[{"given":"Erhan","family":"Altunbas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, 34854 Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2758-8214","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emir","family":"Unal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, 34854 Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-9203-9078","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Onatcan","family":"Ozogul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, 34899 Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cigdem","family":"Ozpolat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, 34854 Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sinan","family":"Karacabey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, 34854 Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1439","DOI":"10.1177\/11297298241291248","article-title":"The NAVIGATE Project: A GloVANet-WoCoVA Position Statement on the Nomenclature for Vascular Access Devices","volume":"26","author":"Spencer","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Vasc. Access"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e3428","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000003428","article-title":"Development of the A-DIVA Scale: A Clinical Predictive Scale to Identify Difficult Intravenous Access in Adult Patients Based on Clinical Observations","volume":"95","author":"Puijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ienj.2016.05.004","article-title":"Effectiveness of Interventions for Adult Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","volume":"31","author":"Parker","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. Emerg. Nurs."},{"key":"ref_4","first-page":"494","article-title":"Venous Access: A Practical Review for 2009","volume":"55","author":"Cheung","year":"2009","journal-title":"Can. Fam. Physician"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e022278","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-022278","article-title":"Factors Associated with Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation First-Time Insertion Success in the Emergency Department. A Multicentre Prospective Cohort Analysis of Patient, Clinician and Product Characteristics","volume":"9","author":"Carr","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.5301\/jva.5000487","article-title":"Insertion of Peripheral Intravenous Cannulae in the Emergency Department: Factors Associated with First-Time Insertion Success","volume":"17","author":"Carr","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Vasc. Access"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1213\/ane.0b013e3181966451","article-title":"Fluid Flow through Intravenous Cannulae in a Clinical Model","volume":"108","author":"McPherson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anesth. Analg."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jemermed.2023.10.008","article-title":"Spiced RCT: Success and Pain Associated with Intravenous Cannulation in the Emergency Department Randomized Controlled Trial","volume":"66","author":"Mitra","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Emerg. Med."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.auec.2021.07.003","article-title":"The Experience of Patients at High Risk of Difficult Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation: An Australian Prospective Observational Study","volume":"25","author":"Sweeny","year":"2022","journal-title":"Australas. Emerg. Care"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1177\/1129729817747531","article-title":"Pain upon Inserting a Peripheral Intravenous Catheter: Size Does Not Matter","volume":"19","author":"Puijn","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Vasc. Access"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pmn.2023.07.010","article-title":"Pain and Satisfaction Perceptions of Ultrasound-Guided versus Conventional Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial","volume":"25","year":"2024","journal-title":"Pain Manag. Nurs."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Loon, F.H.J., van Hooff, L.W.E., de Boer, H.D., Koopman, S.S.H.A., Buise, M.P., Korsten, H.H.M., Dierick-van Daele, A.T.M., and Bouwman, A.R.A. (2019). The Modified A-DIVA Scale as a Predictive Tool for Prospective Identification of Adult Patients at Risk of a Difficult Intravenous Access: A Multicenter Validation Study. J. Clin. Med., 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm8020144"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e081123","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2024-081123","article-title":"CONSORT 2025 Statement: Updated Guideline for Reporting Randomised Trials","volume":"389","author":"Hopewell","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0644(96)70238-X","article-title":"Clinical Significance of Reported Changes in Pain Severity","volume":"27","author":"Todd","year":"1996","journal-title":"Ann. Emerg. Med."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1067\/mem.2001.118863","article-title":"Prospective Validation of Clinically Important Changes in Pain Severity Measured on a Visual Analog Scale","volume":"38","author":"Gallagher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ann. Emerg. Med."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1136\/emj.18.3.205","article-title":"The Minimum Clinically Significant Difference in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score Does Not Differ with Severity of Pain","volume":"18","author":"Kelly","year":"2001","journal-title":"Emerg. Med. J."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1853","DOI":"10.1177\/11297298231190250","article-title":"Comparison of Procedure-Related Pain and Patient Satisfaction According to Catheter Size and Insertion Site in Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization","volume":"25","author":"Kaplan","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Vasc. Access"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4451","DOI":"10.1111\/jan.14933","article-title":"Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Management in Childbirth (PICMIC): A Multi-Centre, Prospective Cohort Study","volume":"77","author":"Kearney","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Adv. Nurs."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2206","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.14816","article-title":"Factors Affecting the First-Attempt Success Rate of Intravenous Cannulation in Older People","volume":"28","author":"Akarca","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Clin. Nurs."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1973","DOI":"10.1177\/11297298261442098","article-title":"A GAVeCeLT-IVAS Bundle for Safe Insertion of Short Peripheral Catheters: The SISPeC Protocol","volume":"27","author":"Pinelli","year":"2026","journal-title":"J. Vasc. Access"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104095","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2021.104095","article-title":"Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure: A Secondary Analysis of Risks from 11,830 Catheters","volume":"124","author":"Marsh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int. J. Nurs. Stud."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1177\/11297298251347816","article-title":"The Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation versus the Landmark Technique in Emergency Department Patients with Difficult Intravenous Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"27","author":"Anderssen","year":"2026","journal-title":"J. Vasc. Access"}],"container-title":["Medicina"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/62\/9\/1747\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,14]],"date-time":"2026-09-14T04:12:27Z","timestamp":1789359147000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/62\/9\/1747"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["medicina62091747"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina62091747","relation":{},"ISSN":["1648-9144"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1648-9144","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]}}}