{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,13]],"date-time":"2026-07-13T10:06:20Z","timestamp":1783937180471,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,19]],"date-time":"2024-12-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1734566400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Tomography"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: This study aimed to assess the interobserver variability of semi-automatic diameter and volumetric measurements versus manual diameter measurements for small lung nodules identified on computed tomography scans. Methods: The radiological patient database was searched for CT thorax examinations with at least one noncalcified solid nodule (\u223c3\u201310 mm). Three radiologists with four to six years of experience evaluated each nodule in accordance with the Fleischner Society guidelines using standard diameter measurements, semi-automatic lesion diameter measurements, and volumetric assessments. Spearman\u2019s correlation coefficient measured intermeasurement agreement. We used descriptive Bland\u2013Altman plots to visualize agreement in the measured data. Potential discrepancies were analyzed. Results: We studied a total of twenty-six nodules. Spearman\u2019s test showed that there was a much stronger relationship (p &lt; 0.05) between reviewers for the semi-automatic diameter and volume measurements (avg. r = 0.97 \u00b1 0.017 and 0.99 \u00b1 0.005, respectively) than for the manual method (avg. r = 0.91 \u00b1 0.017). In the Bland\u2013Altman test, the semi-automatic diameter measure outperformed the manual method for all comparisons, while the volumetric method had better results in two out of three comparisons. The incidence of reviewers modifying the software\u2019s automatic outline varied between 62% and 92%. Conclusions: Semi-automatic techniques significantly reduced interobserver variability for small solid nodules, which has important implications for diagnostic assessments and screening. Both the semi-automatic diameter and semi-automatic volume measurements showed improvements over the manual measurement approach. Training could further diminish observer variability, given the considerable diversity in the number of adjustments among reviewers.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/tomography10120148","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,19]],"date-time":"2024-12-19T10:54:20Z","timestamp":1734605660000},"page":"2087-2099","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Interobserver Variability in Manual Versus Semi-Automatic CT Assessments of Small Lung Nodule Diameter and Volume"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Frida","family":"Zacharias","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Division Diagnostics, Hudiksvall Hospital, Region G\u00e4vleborg, SE 824 81 Hudiksvall, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4754-9626","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tony Martin","family":"Svahn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, Region G\u00e4vleborg, SE 801 88 G\u00e4vle, Sweden"},{"name":"Department of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Division Diagnostics, G\u00e4vle Hospital, Region G\u00e4vleborg, SE 801 88 G\u00e4vle, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170025","DOI":"10.1183\/16000617.0025-2017","article-title":"Lung nodules: Size still matters","volume":"26","author":"Larici","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur. Respir. Rev."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"ii1","DOI":"10.1136\/thoraxjnl-2015-207168","article-title":"British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules","volume":"70","author":"Callister","year":"2015","journal-title":"Thorax"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2017161659","article-title":"Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017","volume":"284","author":"MacMahon","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e93S","DOI":"10.1378\/chest.12-2351","article-title":"Evaluation of Individuals with Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer? Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed; American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines","volume":"143","author":"Gould","year":"2013","journal-title":"Chest"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120628","article-title":"Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: A statement from the Fleischner Society","volume":"266","author":"Naidich","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/S0720-048X(02)00302-9","article-title":"Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT","volume":"45","author":"Diederich","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMe1916361","article-title":"Mortality Reduction with Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer","volume":"382","author":"Duffy","year":"2020","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.21037\/tlcr.2017.01.05","article-title":"Volume versus diameter assessment of small pulmonary nodules in CT lung cancer screening","volume":"6","author":"Han","year":"2017","journal-title":"Transl. Lung Cancer Res."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2020.01.008","article-title":"Intervention to Reduce Interobserver Variability in Computed Tomographic Measurement of Cancer Lesions Among Experienced Radiologists","volume":"50","author":"Woo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.14366\/usg.22123","article-title":"Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability between manual segmentation and semi-automated segmentation for carotid vessel wall volume measurements on three-dimensional ultrasonography","volume":"42","author":"Chan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultrasonography"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.7555\/JBR.31.20160107","article-title":"Semi-automated carotid lumen segmentation in computed tomography angiography images","volume":"31","author":"Hemmati","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Biomed. Res."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2015.10.017","article-title":"Pulmonary nodules again? The 2015 British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules","volume":"71","author":"Baldwin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin. Radiol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1911793","article-title":"Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial","volume":"382","author":"Scholten","year":"2020","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20220709","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20220709","article-title":"Detection and size quantification of pulmonary nodules in ultralow-dose versus regular-dose CT: A comparative study in COPD patients","volume":"96","author":"Han","year":"2023","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gross, C.F., Jungblut, L., Schindera, S., Messerli, M., Fretz, V., Frauenfelder, T., and Martini, K. (2023). Comparability of Pulmonary Nodule Size Measurements among Different Scanners and Protocols: Should Diameter Be Favorized over Volume?. Diagnostics, 13.","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics13040631"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4315","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-018-5849-5","article-title":"Dose estimation of ultra-low-dose chest CT to different sized adult patients","volume":"29","author":"Svahn","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncab154","article-title":"Comparison of Pulmonary Nodule Detection, Reading Times and Patient Doses of Ultra-Low Dose Ct, Standard Dose Ct and Digital Radiography","volume":"196","author":"Svahn","year":"2021","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2411050860","article-title":"Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: Interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements","volume":"241","author":"Gietema","year":"2006","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2017151022","article-title":"Use of Volumetry for Lung Nodule Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"284","author":"Devaraj","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2513081313","article-title":"Pulmonary nodules: Volume repeatability at multidetector CT lung cancer screening","volume":"251","author":"Marchiano","year":"2009","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., and Gavenonis, S. (2012). Differences in Radiologists\u2019 Experiences and Performance in Breast Tomosynthesis. Breast Imaging\u2014IWDM 2012, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer, Science.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-31271-7"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2017162894","article-title":"Recommendations for Measuring Pulmonary Nodules at CT: A Statement from the Fleischner Society","volume":"285","author":"Bankier","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2008.10.026","article-title":"New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)","volume":"45","author":"Eisenhauer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2452061054","article-title":"Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance","volume":"245","author":"Gietema","year":"2007","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2015.015","article-title":"Understanding Bland Altman analysis","volume":"25","author":"Giavarina","year":"2015","journal-title":"Biochem. Med."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2312030167","article-title":"Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?","volume":"231","author":"Revel","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["Tomography"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2379-139X\/10\/12\/148\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T16:55:47Z","timestamp":1760115347000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2379-139X\/10\/12\/148"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,19]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["tomography10120148"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/tomography10120148","relation":{},"ISSN":["2379-139X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2379-139X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,19]]}}}