{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T14:08:12Z","timestamp":1788962892387,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":64,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788912000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"d\u014dTERRA International"},{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02k5t6c64","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Toxics"],"abstract":"<jats:p>The dose\u2013response adaptation of the genomic allergen rapid detection for skin sensitizers (GARDskin DR) assay is a non-animal method for predicting sensitization potency. This proof-of-concept comparative analysis evaluates outputs from a component-based prediction model (CP), GARDskin DR, and historical local lymph node assays (LLNA), exploring the applicability of CP and GARDskin DR for evaluating the no-expected-sensitization induction level (NESIL) potencies of essential oils. Eight well-studied essential oils were selected: cedarwood, cinnamon bark, clove bud, geranium, lavender, lemongrass, spearmint, and tea tree oils. Each underwent GARDskin DR as well as GC\u2013MS, from which CP model outputs were derived. GARDskin DR, CP, and LLNA outputs were compared graphically and using preliminary descriptive statistics. Results show overall statistical concordance in material ranking between methods (Kendall\u2019s W = 0.857, p = 0.017). Bland\u2013Altman log-transformed bias and limits of agreement show numerically higher NESILCP compared to corresponding NESILGARD and NESILLLNA, but sensitivity analysis shows this finding is statistically sensitive to geranium oil. Spearman\u2019s rank correlations were significant between NESILCP vs. NESILGARD and NESILLLNA but not between NESILGARD vs. NESILLLNA despite numerical similarity. Given the small sample, no statistical findings from this study are generalizable and should be interpreted descriptively. However, the NESIL results provide preliminary evidence supporting further evaluation of GARDskin DR and CP for dermal sensitization potency testing of essential oils.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/toxics14090800","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T12:26:11Z","timestamp":1788956771000},"page":"800","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative Analysis of Test Methods for Predicting Dermal Sensitization Potency in Essential Oils: A Component-Based Prediction Model, GARDskin Dose\u2013Response Assay, and Local Lymph Node Assay"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-1317-0438","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joseph T.","family":"Dawson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"d\u014dTERRA International, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"conceptualization","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"methodology","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"software","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"validation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"formal-analysis","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"investigation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"data-curation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-original-draft","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-review-editing","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"visualization","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"project-administration","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"funding-acquisition","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"given":"Tim","family":"Lindberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Senzagen AB, 22381 Lund, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"conceptualization","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"methodology","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"resources","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-original-draft","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-review-editing","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"visualization","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2950-1074","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Prabodh","family":"Satyal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"d\u014dTERRA International, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"methodology","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"investigation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"resources","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"given":"Ambika","family":"Poudel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"d\u014dTERRA International, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"methodology","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"investigation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-original-draft","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"given":"Dakota T.","family":"Carter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"d\u014dTERRA International, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"investigation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-original-draft","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-review-editing","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"given":"Sara A.","family":"Shah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"d\u014dTERRA International, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"investigation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-original-draft","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-review-editing","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"given":"C\u00e9cile","family":"Bascoul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"d\u014dTERRA International, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"conceptualization","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"methodology","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"investigation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"resources","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-original-draft","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-review-editing","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"supervision","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"funding-acquisition","vocabulary":"credit"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"UN (2023). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS), United Nations. [10th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2014.11.014","article-title":"Criteria for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. (RIFM) Safety Evaluation Process for Fragrance Ingredients","volume":"82","author":"Api","year":"2015","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104805","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2020.104805","article-title":"Updating Exposure Assessment for Skin Sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment for Fragrance Materials","volume":"118","author":"Api","year":"2020","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112715","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2021.112715","article-title":"The RIFM Approach to Evaluating Natural Complex Substances (NCS)","volume":"159","author":"Api","year":"2022","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_5","unstructured":"SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) (2018). Opinion on Skin Sensitisation Quantitative Risk Assessment for Fragrance Ingredients (QRA2), Preliminary Version of 24\u201325 October 2017, Final Version of 30 July 2018, SCCS\/1589\/17, SCCS."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2009.08.016","article-title":"Potency Values from the Local Lymph Node Assay: Application to Classification, Labelling and Risk Assessment","volume":"56","author":"Loveless","year":"2010","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2007.11.004","article-title":"The Research Institute for Fragrance Materials\u2019 Human Repeated Insult Patch Test Protocol","volume":"52","author":"Politano","year":"2008","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"ICCS\u2014International Collaboration on Cosmetic Safety (2026, June 14). ICCS New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) Definition\u2014Advancing Animal-Free Assessments of Cosmetics and Their Ingredients. Available online: https:\/\/www.iccs-cosmetics.org\/iccs-nams-definition."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1038\/laban.1217","article-title":"Improving Quality of Science Through Better Animal Welfare: The NC3Rs Strategy","volume":"46","author":"Prescott","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lab Anim."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Islas-Robles, A., Ramani, M., Phillips, J., Costin, G.-E., Islas-Robles, A., Ramani, M., Phillips, J., and Costin, G.-E. (2025). New Horizons in Skin Sensitization Assessment of Complex Mixtures: The Use of New Approach Methodologies Beyond Regulatory Approaches. Toxics, 13.","DOI":"10.3390\/toxics13080693"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crtox.2024.100205","article-title":"The Skin Allergy Risk Assessment-Integrated Chemical Environment (SARA-ICE) Defined Approach to Derive Points of Departure for Skin Sensitization","volume":"8","author":"Reinke","year":"2025","journal-title":"Curr. Res. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105597","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2024.105597","article-title":"GARDskin Dose-Response Assay and Its Application in Conducting Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for Fragrance Materials Using a Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) Framework","volume":"149","author":"Donthamsetty","year":"2024","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gradin, R., Tourneix, F., Mattson, U., Andersson, J., Amaral, F., Forreryd, A., Al\u00e9p\u00e9e, N., and Johansson, H. (2024). In Vitro Prediction of Skin-Sensitizing Potency Using the GARDskin Dose\u2013Response Assay: A Simple Regression Approach. Toxics, 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/toxics12090626"},{"key":"ref_14","first-page":"135","article-title":"Analysis of Publically Available Skin Sensitization Data from REACH Registrations 2008\u20132014","volume":"33","author":"Luechtefeld","year":"2016","journal-title":"Altex"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.14573\/altex.2201081","article-title":"Probabilistic Risk Assessment\u2014The Keystone for the Future of Toxicology","volume":"39","author":"Maertens","year":"2022","journal-title":"Altex"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2018.04.022","article-title":"Chemical Applicability Domain of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for Skin Sensitisation Potency. Part 4. Quantitative Correlation of LLNA Potency with Human Potency","volume":"96","author":"Roberts","year":"2018","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tiv.2016.04.008","article-title":"Analysis of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) Variability for Assessing the Prediction of Skin Sensitisation Potential and Potency of Chemicals with Non-Animal Approaches","volume":"34","author":"Dumont","year":"2016","journal-title":"Toxicol. Vitr."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2023.105333","article-title":"Reduced Specificity for the Local Lymph Node Assay for Lipophilic Chemicals: Implications for the Validation of New Approach Methods for Skin Sensitization","volume":"138","author":"Natsch","year":"2023","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"Nonclinical Evaluation of the Immunotoxic Potential of Pharmaceuticals, Guidance for Industry, Pharmacology\/Toxicology, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2023). Nonclinical Evaluation of the Immunotoxic Potential of Pharmaceuticals: Guidance for Industry."},{"key":"ref_20","unstructured":"OECD (2024). Test No. 442E: In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: In Vitro Skin Sensitisation Assays Addressing the Key Event on Activation of Dendritic Cells on the Adverse Outcome Pathway for Skin Sensitisation. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, OECD Publishing."},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"OECD (2025). Guideline No. 497: Defined Approaches on Skin Sensitisation. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, OECD Publishing."},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"NTP\/NICEATM (2025). Evaluation of the GARD\u2122skin Sensitization Test Method Using Substances of Regulatory Interest."},{"key":"ref_23","first-page":"263","article-title":"Determining a Point of Departure for Skin Sensitization Potency and Quantitative Risk Assessment of Fragrance Ingredients Using the GARDskin Dose-Response Assay","volume":"42","author":"Lee","year":"2025","journal-title":"Altex"},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18904","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-98247-7","article-title":"Quantitative Assessment of Sensitizing Potency Using a Dose-Response Adaptation of GARDskin","volume":"11","author":"Gradin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Desai, K.R., Ranade, J.R., Nagane, R.M., Patel, M.V., Deshpande, A.D., Roper, C.S., and Kantli, G.B. (2025). Comprehensive In Vitro Safety Assessment of Acorus calamus Rhizome Oil Using OECD-Compliant New Approach Methods: Classification as a GHS Category 1B Sensitiser and Category 2 Irritant. Toxics, 13.","DOI":"10.3390\/toxics13121006"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7470","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-11171-2","article-title":"Application of Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay for Assessing the Skin Sensitization Potential of Essential Oils","volume":"12","author":"Omeragic","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1080\/13880209.2025.2583832","article-title":"From Vision to Reality: Five Years of the Botanical Safety Consortium","volume":"63","author":"Mitchell","year":"2025","journal-title":"Pharm. Biol."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Puginier, M., Roso, A., Groux, H., Gerbeix, C., and Cottrez, F. (2022). Strategy to Avoid Skin Sensitization: Application to Botanical Cosmetic Ingredients. Cosmetics, 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/cosmetics9020040"},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105978","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2025.105978","article-title":"Case Studies on Skin Sensitization Risk Assessment: Estimating the PoD Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Models for Substances with Known and Unknown Structure","volume":"164","author":"Imai","year":"2026","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"Adams, R.P. (2007). Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography\/Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy, Allured Publishing. [4th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_31","unstructured":"Satyal, P. (2015). Development of GC-MS Database of Essential Oil Components by the Analysis of Natural Essential Oils and Synthetic Compounds and Discovery of Biologically Active Novel Chemotypes in Essential Oils. [Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Alabama in Huntsville]. Available online: https:\/\/louis.uah.edu\/uah-dissertations\/63."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johansson, H., Lindstedt, M., Albrekt, A.-S., and Borrebaeck, C.A.K. (2011). A Genomic Biomarker Signature Can Predict Skin Sensitizers Using a Cell-Based In Vitro Alternative to Animal Tests. BMC Genom., 12.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2164-12-399"},{"key":"ref_33","unstructured":"ECHA (2017). Juniper, Juniperus Virginiana, Ext. EC Number 285-370-3 CAS Number 85085-41-2\u2014Registration Dossier, REACH Registration. Available online: https:\/\/chem.echa.europa.eu\/100.077.582\/dossier-view\/0d373a93-35d0-4459-a324-b99ad2a4c0be\/d3aa1c34-aef6-4882-a6ab-83aa1b06ce76_d3aa1c34-aef6-4882-a6ab-83aa1b06ce76?searchText=juniperus%20virginiana."},{"key":"ref_34","unstructured":"NTP (2026, March 02). ICCVAM Evaluations of the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA), 2013, Available online: https:\/\/ntp.niehs.nih.gov\/iccvam\/methods\/immunotox\/niceatm-llnadatabase-23dec2013.xls."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2005.10.006","article-title":"Investigation of the Dermal Sensitization Potential of Various Essential Oils in the Local Lymph Node Assay","volume":"44","author":"Lalko","year":"2006","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2008.01402.x","article-title":"Lavender Oil Lacks Natural Protection against Autoxidation, Forming Strong Contact Allergens on Air Exposure","volume":"59","author":"Hagvall","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"ref_37","unstructured":"ECHA (2018). Melaleuca Alternifolia, Ext. EC Number 285-377-1 CAS Number 85085-48-9\u2014Registration Dossier, REACH Registration. Available online: https:\/\/chem.echa.europa.eu\/100.077.588\/dossier-view\/69b92e4a-e867-4745-8fbf-637d789a2217\/372bcf33-7b77-438a-88fe-e9e3a1b24ac7_372bcf33-7b77-438a-88fe-e9e3a1b24ac7?searchText=melaleuca."},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0105-1873.2005.00707.x","article-title":"Predictive Identification of Human Skin Sensitization Thresholds","volume":"53","author":"Basketter","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115835","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2025.115835","article-title":"RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Cedrene, CAS Registry Number 11028-42-5","volume":"206","author":"Api","year":"2025","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110710","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2019.110710","article-title":"RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Cinnamaldehyde, CAS Registry Number 104-55-2","volume":"134","author":"Api","year":"2019","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113027","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2022.113027","article-title":"Update to RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Eugenol, CAS Registry Number 97-53-0","volume":"163","author":"Api","year":"2022","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112621","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2021.112621","article-title":"RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Citronellyl Formate, CAS Registry Number 105-85-1","volume":"158","author":"Api","year":"2021","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114805","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2024.114805","article-title":"Update to RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Linalyl Acetate, CAS Registry Number 115-95-7","volume":"192","author":"Api","year":"2024","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115950","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2026.115950","article-title":"Update to RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Citral, CAS Registry Number 5392-40-5","volume":"210","author":"Api","year":"2026","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112975","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2022.112975","article-title":"RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, l-Carvone, CAS Registry Number 6485-40-1","volume":"163","author":"Api","year":"2022","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112712","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2021.112712","article-title":"RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, p-Mentha-1,3-Diene, CAS Registry Number 99-86-5","volume":"159","author":"Api","year":"2022","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.07.013","article-title":"Chemical applicability domain of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation potency. Part 2. The biological variability of the murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitization","volume":"80","author":"Roberts","year":"2016","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"ref_48","first-page":"379","article-title":"LLNA Variability: An Essential Ingredient for a Comprehensive Assessment of Non-Animal Skin Sensitization Test Methods and Strategies","volume":"32","author":"Hoffmann","year":"2015","journal-title":"Altex"},{"key":"ref_49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1627","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2005.05.004","article-title":"An Alpha, Beta-Unsaturated Oxime Identified as a Strong Contact Allergen. Indications of Antigen Formation via Several Pathways","volume":"43","author":"Nilsson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.2310\/6620.2009.09038","article-title":"Local Lymph Node Data for the Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternatives: A Second Compilation","volume":"21","author":"Kern","year":"2010","journal-title":"Dermatitis"},{"key":"ref_51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1002\/jat.951","article-title":"Assessment of the Skin Sensitization Potency of Eugenol and Its Dimers Using a Non-Radioisotopic Modification of the Local Lymph Node Assay","volume":"24","author":"Takeyoshi","year":"2004","journal-title":"J. Appl. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2007.01262.x","article-title":"Autoxidation of Linalyl Acetate, the Main Component of Lavender Oil, Creates Potent Contact Allergens","volume":"58","author":"Hagvall","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"ref_53","unstructured":"SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) (2025). Scientific Opinion on Tea Tree Oil (CAS\/EC No. 68647-73-4\/285-377-1) Used in Cosmetic Products, Preliminary Version of 28 May 2025, Final Version of 30 October 2025, SCCS\/1681\/25, SCCS."},{"key":"ref_54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1159\/000078694","article-title":"Predictive Testing for Irritancy and Allergenicity of Tea Tree Oil in Normal Human Subjects","volume":"2","author":"Aspres","year":"2003","journal-title":"Exog. Dermatol."},{"key":"ref_55","unstructured":"SCCP (Scientific Committee on Consumer Products) (2008). Opinion on Tea Tree Oil, Final Version of 16 December 2008, SCCP\/1155\/08, SCCS."},{"key":"ref_56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1021\/tx060006n","article-title":"Conjugated dienes as prohaptens in contact allergy: In vivo and in vitro studies of structure-activity relationships, sensitizing capacity, and metabolic activation","volume":"19","author":"Luthman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Chem. Res. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112998","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2022.112998","article-title":"RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Cedrol, CAS Registry Number 77-53-2","volume":"163","author":"Api","year":"2022","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115034","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2024.115034","article-title":"RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Cis-3-Hexenyl Benzoate, CAS Registry Number 25152-85-6","volume":"194","author":"Api","year":"2024","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111500","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2020.111500","article-title":"RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Benzyl Benzoate, CAS Registry Number 120-51-4","volume":"144","author":"Api","year":"2020","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"ref_60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tisserand, R., and Young, R. (2014). Essential Oil Safety: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-443-06241-4.00013-8"},{"key":"ref_61","first-page":"1147","article-title":"Factors Affecting Chemical Variability of Essential Oils: A Review of Recent Developments","volume":"4","author":"Barra","year":"2009","journal-title":"Nat. Prod. Commun."},{"key":"ref_62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heinrich, M., Jalil, B., Abdel-Tawab, M., Echeverria, J., Kuli\u0107, \u017d., McGaw, L.J., Pezzuto, J.M., Potterat, O., and Wang, J.-B. (2022). Best Practice in the Chemical Characterisation of Extracts Used in Pharmacological and Toxicological Research-The ConPhyMP-Guidelines. Front. Pharmacol., 13.","DOI":"10.3389\/fphar.2022.953205"},{"key":"ref_63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jep.2019.112230","article-title":"Best Practice in Research\u2014Overcoming Common Challenges in Phytopharmacological Research","volume":"246","author":"Heinrich","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Ethnopharmacol."},{"key":"ref_64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"D1516","DOI":"10.1093\/nar\/gkae1059","article-title":"PubChem 2025 Update","volume":"53","author":"Kim","year":"2025","journal-title":"Nucleic Acids Res."}],"container-title":["Toxics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2305-6304\/14\/9\/800\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T13:12:51Z","timestamp":1788959571000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2305-6304\/14\/9\/800"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]},"references-count":64,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["toxics14090800"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/toxics14090800","relation":{},"ISSN":["2305-6304"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2305-6304","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]}}}