{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T17:59:18Z","timestamp":1785347958311,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":87,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785283200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Vaccines"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background\/Objectives: Vaccine-preventable disease may generate medico-legal disputes not only after an adverse event following immunization, but also when a clinician is alleged to have failed to mention, recommend, revisit, refer for, or document a clinically relevant vaccine. We examine this \u201cunmentioned vaccine\u201d problem while distinguishing existing law (lex lata) from proposed good practice (lex ferenda). Methods: We conducted a documented purposive narrative and comparative medico-legal review. PubMed\/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, structured scholarly web searches, publicly accessible legal repositories, and official policy websites were searched from database inception through 21 July 2026 using combinations of vaccination, informed consent\/refusal, failure to recommend or vaccinate, referral, documentation, negligence, causation, and LMIC terms. Authorities were selected for doctrinal relevance and jurisdictional contrast, with citation chaining. Results: In the selected jurisdictions, patient-centered disclosure of material risks and reasonable alternatives is recognized in differing forms. Vaccine-specific cases are sparse and fact-sensitive and do not establish a universal duty to recommend, refer, or revisit every vaccine. Provider recommendation influences uptake, but this behavioral evidence does not itself establish legal duty or causation, and direct empirical evidence linking counselling omissions to claims remains limited. We therefore present ADRR\u2014assess, discuss and disclose, recommend or refer, and record and revisit\u2014as proposed practice guidelines developed by the authors and presented in conceptual form, not as a validated legal or clinical standard. Conclusions: ADRR may support proportionate, system-level preparedness, especially in LMICs, but implementation must account for access, supply, workforce, financing, records, and legal context. Stakeholder co-design and empirical validation are required before routine adoption.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/vaccines14080664","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T17:01:46Z","timestamp":1785344506000},"page":"664","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Vaccine That Was Never Mentioned: A Comparative Medico-Legal Analysis of the Duty to Inform and Document Preventive Immunization, with Proposed Practice Guidelines"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Sanit","family":"Thongsriratch","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9907-6106","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Therdpong","family":"Thongseiratch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 73170, Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Saratis","family":"Pairoh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Office of the Attorney General, Bangkok 10210, Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8680-9860","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Puttichart","family":"Khantee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2021, February 06). Vaccines and Immunization. Available online: https:\/\/www.who.int\/health-topics\/vaccines-and-immunization."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2020). Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind, World Health Organization."},{"key":"ref_3","first-page":"S1","article-title":"The Immunization Agenda 2030: A vision of global impact, reaching all, grounded in the realities of a changing world","volume":"42","author":"Lemango","year":"2022","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2021.09.045","article-title":"Implementing the Immunization Agenda 2030: A framework for action through coordinated planning, monitoring and evaluation, ownership and accountability, and communications and advocacy","volume":"42","author":"Lindstrand","year":"2023","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"898","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(20)31558-0","article-title":"Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: A large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study","volume":"396","author":"Simas","year":"2020","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref_6","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2022). Human Papillomavirus Vaccines: WHO Position Paper, December 2022. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec., 97, 645\u2013672."},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2020). Global Strategy to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer as a Public Health Problem, World Health Organization."},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2024). Dengue Vaccines: WHO Position Paper, May 2024. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec., 99, 203\u2013224."},{"key":"ref_9","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Monusko v. Postle, 175 Mich. App. 269, 437 N.W.2d 367. Michigan Court of Appeals, 23 February 1989. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/michigan\/court-of-appeals-published\/1989\/95314-0.html."},{"key":"ref_10","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). McNulty v. McDowell, 415 Mass. 369, 613 N.E.2d 904. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 14 June 1993. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/massachusetts\/supreme-court\/volumes\/415\/415mass369.html."},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Smith v. Pavlovich, 394 Ill. App. 3d 458, 914 N.E.2d 1258, 333 Ill. Dec. 446. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District, 28 August 2009. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/illinois\/court-of-appeals-fifth-appellate-district\/2009\/5080287.html."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-019-0064-8","article-title":"SANRA\u2014A Scale for the Quality Assessment of Narrative Review Articles","volume":"4","author":"Baethge","year":"2019","journal-title":"Res. Integr. Peer Rev."},{"key":"ref_13","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 19 May 1972. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/appellate-courts\/cadc\/22099\/22099.html."},{"key":"ref_14","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11; [2015] A.C. 1430. Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, 11 March 2015. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/www.supremecourt.uk\/cases\/uksc-2013-0136."},{"key":"ref_15","unstructured":"General Medical Council (2020). Decision Making and Consent, General Medical Council."},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Rogers v. Whitaker [1992] HCA 58; (1992) 175 CLR 479. High Court of Australia, 19 November 1992. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/www.austlii.edu.au\/cgi-bin\/viewdoc\/au\/cases\/cth\/HCA\/1992\/58.html."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Reibl v. Hughes, 1980 CanLII 23 (SCC); [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880. Supreme Court of Canada, 7 October 1980. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/1mjvr."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 W.L.R. 582; [1957] 2 All E.R. 118. Queen\u2019s Bench Division, High Court of Justice of England and Wales, 26 February 1957. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/www.bailii.org\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/QB\/1957\/1.html."},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [1985] A.C. 871; [1985] UKHL 1. House of Lords of the United Kingdom, 21 February 1985. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/www.bailii.org\/uk\/cases\/UKHL\/1985\/1.html."},{"key":"ref_20","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Chester v. Afshar [2004] UKHL 41; [2005] 1 A.C. 134. House of Lords of the United Kingdom, 14 October 2004. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/www.bailii.org\/uk\/cases\/UKHL\/2004\/41.html."},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). McCulloch and Others v. Forth Valley Health Board [2023] UKSC 26; 2023 S.C. (UKSC) 91. Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, 12 July 2023. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/www.supremecourt.uk\/cases\/uksc-2021-0149."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1177\/0098858819892745","article-title":"Informed Consent to Vaccination: Theoretical, Legal, and Empirical Insights","volume":"45","author":"Reiss","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am. J. Law Med."},{"key":"ref_23","first-page":"265","article-title":"Medical Advice and Vaccinating: What Liability?","volume":"26","author":"Naprawa","year":"2015","journal-title":"Univ. Fla. J. Law Public Policy"},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1080\/21645515.2020.1724742","article-title":"Dismissal policies for vaccine refusal among US physicians: A literature review","volume":"16","author":"Garcia","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum. Vaccines Immunother."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amantea, C., Rossi, M.F., Santoro, P.E., Beccia, F., Gualano, M.R., Borrelli, I., da Costa, J.P., Daniele, A., Tumminello, A., and Boccia, S. (2022). Medical Liability of the Vaccinating Doctor: Comparing Policies in European Union Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph19127191"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B\u00eersanu, S.-E., Plaiasu, M.C., and Nanu, C.A. (2022). Informed Consent in Mass Vaccination against COVID-19 in Romania: Implications of Bad Management. Vaccines, 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/vaccines10111871"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beccia, F., Rossi, M.F., Amantea, C., Villani, L., Daniele, A., Tumminello, A., Aristei, L., Santoro, P.E., Borrelli, I., and Ricciardi, W. (2022). COVID-19 Vaccination and Medical Liability: An International Perspective in 18 Countries. Vaccines, 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/vaccines10081275"},{"key":"ref_28","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Tenuto v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Co., 90 N.Y.2d 606, 665 N.Y.S.2d 17, 687 N.E.2d 1300. New York Court of Appeals, 25 November 1997. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/new-york\/court-of-appeals\/1997\/90-n-y-2d-606-0.html."},{"key":"ref_29","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 30 July 1974. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/cases\/vaccines\/reyes_v_wyeth_laboratories.htm."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 9 July 1968. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/biotech.law.lsu.edu\/cases\/vaccines\/davis_v_wyeth_laboratories.htm."},{"key":"ref_31","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14, 551 P.2d 334. Supreme Court of California, 1 July 1976. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/california\/supreme-court\/3d\/17\/425.html."},{"key":"ref_32","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Hofmann v. Blackmon, 241 So. 2d 752. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, 11 November 1970. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/florida\/fourth-district-court-of-appeal\/1970\/69-718-0.html."},{"key":"ref_33","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Reisner v. Regents of the University of California, 31 Cal. App. 4th 1195, 37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 518. California Court of Appeal, Second District, 27 January 1995. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/california\/court-of-appeal\/4th\/31\/1195.html."},{"key":"ref_34","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2026, June 16). ACIP Shared Clinical Decision-Making Recommendations, Available online: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/acip\/vaccine-recommendations\/shared-clinical-decision-making.html."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.japh.2020.06.027","article-title":"Shared clinical decision making on vaccines: Nothing has really changed for pharmacists","volume":"60","author":"Hogue","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Am. Pharm. Assoc."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1454","DOI":"10.1080\/21645515.2015.1129090","article-title":"Provider communication about HPV vaccination: A systematic review","volume":"12","author":"Gilkey","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum. Vaccines Immunother."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106554","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2021.106554","article-title":"Provider communication and HPV vaccine uptake: A meta-analysis and systematic review","volume":"148","author":"Oh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prev. Med."},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e20161764","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2016-1764","article-title":"Announcements Versus Conversations to Improve HPV Vaccination Coverage: A Randomized Trial","volume":"139","author":"Brewer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1998","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2014.302425","article-title":"The Influence of Provider Communication Behaviors on Parental Vaccine Acceptance and Visit Experience","volume":"105","author":"Opel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am. J. Public Health"},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chandeying, N., and Thongseiratch, T. (2024). Clinician Communication Training to Increase Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines, 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/vaccines12060611"},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1981","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-21-0733","article-title":"Disparities in Healthcare Providers\u2019 Recommendation of HPV Vaccination for U.S. Adolescents: A Systematic Review","volume":"30","author":"Kong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lin, C., Mullen, J., Smith, D., Kotarba, M., Kaplan, S.J., and Tu, P. (2021). Healthcare Providers\u2019 Vaccine Perceptions, Hesitancy, and Recommendation to Patients: A Systematic Review. Vaccines, 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/vaccines9070713"},{"key":"ref_43","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11. Supreme Court of the United States, 20 February 1905. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/197\/11\/."},{"key":"ref_44","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174. Supreme Court of the United States, 13 November 1922. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/260\/174\/."},{"key":"ref_45","unstructured":"(2026, January 28). Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158. Supreme Court of the United States, 31 January 1944. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/321\/158\/."},{"key":"ref_46","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2026, June 16). About Vaccine Information Statements, Available online: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/vaccines\/hcp\/about-vis\/index.html."},{"key":"ref_47","unstructured":"(2026, June 08). Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223. Supreme Court of the United States, 22 February 2011. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/562\/223\/."},{"key":"ref_48","first-page":"255","article-title":"Physician Dismissal of Vaccine Refusers: A Legal and Ethical Analysis","volume":"13","author":"Harmon","year":"2020","journal-title":"McGill J. Law Health"},{"key":"ref_49","unstructured":"European Court of Human Rights (2026, June 08). Vav\u0159i\u010dka and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], Application Nos. 47621\/13, 3867\/14, 73094\/14, 19306\/15, 19298\/15 and 43883\/15. Judgment of 8 April 2021. [Court Decision]. Available online: https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-209039."},{"key":"ref_50","unstructured":"(2026, July 22). National Health Act, B.E. 2550 (2007). Government Gazette 2007, Volume 124, Part 16a, 19 March 2007. Office of the National Health Commission: Nonthaburi, Thailand. [Legislation]. Available online: https:\/\/old.nationalhealth.or.th\/sites\/default\/files\/upload_files\/dmdocs\/nationalhealth_act_en.pdf."},{"key":"ref_51","unstructured":"Medical Council of Thailand, Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council, Pharmacy Council of Thailand, Dental Council of Thailand, Physical Therapy Council, Medical Technology Council, and Committee on the Practice of the Art of Healing (2015). Declaration of Patients\u2019 Rights and Preferences, Medical Council of Thailand."},{"key":"ref_52","unstructured":"(2026, June 08). Thailand. Civil and Commercial Code, Book II: Obligations, Title V: Wrongful Acts, Section 420. Office of the Council of State: Bangkok, Thailand. [Legislation]. Available online: https:\/\/www.krisdika.go.th\/librarian\/get?sysid=567410&ext=pdf."},{"key":"ref_53","unstructured":"(2026, July 22). Sanatorium Act, B.E. 2541 (1998) as amended. Government Gazette 1998, Volume 115. Department of Health Service Support, Ministry of Public Health: Nonthaburi, Thailand. [Legislation]. Available online: https:\/\/hss.moph.go.th\/webs\/law\/fileupload_doc\/2021-08-24-12-21-3498427.pdf."},{"key":"ref_54","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023). General Best Practice Guidelines for Immunization: Best Practices Guidance of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices."},{"key":"ref_55","unstructured":"American Academy of Pediatrics (2026, June 16). Refusal to Vaccinate. Available online: https:\/\/www.aap.org\/en\/patient-care\/immunizations\/implementing-immunization-administration-in-your-practice\/refusal-to-vaccinate\/."},{"key":"ref_56","unstructured":"(2026, June 16). Immunize.org. Record of Vaccine Declination in the Medical Office. Available online: https:\/\/www.immunize.org\/clinical\/a-z\/record-vaccine-declination-medical-office\/."},{"key":"ref_57","unstructured":"American Academy of Pediatrics (2026, June 16). Vaccine Information Statements and Liability. Available online: https:\/\/www.aap.org\/en\/patient-care\/immunizations\/implementing-immunization-administration-in-your-practice\/vaccine-information-statements\/."},{"key":"ref_58","first-page":"595","article-title":"Compensating the Victims of Failure to Vaccinate: What Are the Options?","volume":"23","author":"Reiss","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cornell J. Law Public Policy"},{"key":"ref_59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1111\/jlme.12305","article-title":"Funding the Costs of Disease Outbreaks Caused by Non-Vaccination","volume":"43","author":"Moser","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Law Med. Ethics"},{"key":"ref_60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2016.303500","article-title":"Parental Refusal of Childhood Vaccines and Medical Neglect Laws","volume":"107","author":"Parasidis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am. J. Public Health"},{"key":"ref_61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wiley, K., Christou-Ergos, M., Degeling, C., McDougall, R., Robinson, P., Attwell, K., Helps, C., Drislane, S., and Carter, S.M. (2023). Childhood Vaccine Refusal and What to Do about It: A Systematic Review of the Ethical Literature. BMC Med. Ethics, 24.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-023-00978-x"},{"key":"ref_62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/PHH.0000000000000069","article-title":"Immunization Information Systems to Increase Vaccination Rates: A Community Guide Systematic Review","volume":"21","author":"Groom","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Public Health Manag. Pract."},{"key":"ref_63","first-page":"924","article-title":"Effect of Electronic Health Record Reminders for Routine Immunizations in Children and Adolescents","volume":"12","author":"Stephens","year":"2021","journal-title":"Appl. Clin. Inform."},{"key":"ref_64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.4338\/ACI-2009-12-CR-0028","article-title":"Utilizing an Electronic Health Record System to Improve Vaccination Coverage in Children","volume":"1","author":"Oster","year":"2010","journal-title":"Appl. Clin. Inform."},{"key":"ref_65","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2022). Vaccine Uptake in the General Population: NICE Guideline NG218, NICE."},{"key":"ref_66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216317690685","article-title":"Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in Palliative Care: Recommendations Based on a Methodological Systematic Review","volume":"31","author":"Payne","year":"2017","journal-title":"Palliat. Med."},{"key":"ref_67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1007\/s10488-010-0319-7","article-title":"Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda","volume":"38","author":"Proctor","year":"2011","journal-title":"Adm. Policy Ment. Health"},{"key":"ref_68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1385","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-021-01454-y","article-title":"COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries","volume":"27","author":"Warren","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nat. Med."},{"key":"ref_69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1038\/s41572-021-00279-w","article-title":"Overcoming vaccine hesitancy in low-income and middle-income regions","volume":"7","author":"Simas","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim."},{"key":"ref_70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e069152","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-069152","article-title":"How prevalent is COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in low-income and middle-income countries and what are the key drivers of hesitancy? Results from 53 countries","volume":"13","author":"Eberwein","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"ref_71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.2471\/BLT.10.081901","article-title":"No-Fault Compensation Following Adverse Events Attributed to Vaccination: A Review of International Programmes","volume":"89","author":"Looker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Bull. World Health Organ."},{"key":"ref_72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mungwira, R.G., Guillard, C., Salda\u00f1a, A., Okabe, N., Petousis-Harris, H., Agbenu, E., Rodewald, L., and Zuber, P.L.F. (2020). Global landscape analysis of no-fault compensation programmes for vaccine injuries: A review and survey of implementing countries. PLoS ONE, 15.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0233334"},{"key":"ref_73","unstructured":"Health Resources and Services Administration (2026, June 16). About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, Available online: https:\/\/www.hrsa.gov\/vaccine-compensation\/about."},{"key":"ref_74","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2026, June 16). Vaccine Injury Compensation. Available online: https:\/\/www.who.int\/groups\/global-advisory-committee-on-vaccine-safety\/topics\/pharmacovigilance\/injury-compensation."},{"key":"ref_75","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2026, June 16). COVAX No-Fault Compensation Program. Available online: https:\/\/www.who.int\/initiatives\/act-accelerator\/covax\/no-fault-compensation."},{"key":"ref_76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2021.10.047","article-title":"COVAX no fault compensation program for COVID-19 vaccine injuries in 92 low and middle income countries","volume":"39","author":"Mazur","year":"2021","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"key":"ref_77","first-page":"55","article-title":"No-Fault Vaccine Injury Compensation Systems Adopted Pursuant to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Response","volume":"37","author":"Halabi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Emory Int. Law Rev."},{"key":"ref_78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2620849","DOI":"10.1080\/21645515.2026.2620849","article-title":"No fault vaccine injury compensation after COVID-19: A systematic literature review and proposed typology","volume":"22","author":"Halabi","year":"2026","journal-title":"Hum. Vaccines Immunother."},{"key":"ref_79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.24171\/j.phrp.2024.0129","article-title":"Comparison and Consideration of Vaccine Injury Compensation Programs in the Republic of Korea, Japan, and Taiwan","volume":"15","author":"Kang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Osong Public Health Res. Perspect."},{"key":"ref_80","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2026, June 16). Standards for Adult Immunization Practice, Available online: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/vaccines-adults\/hcp\/imz-standards\/index.html."},{"key":"ref_81","unstructured":"National Vaccine Advisory Committee (1993). Standards for Pediatric Immunization Practice. Public Health Rep., 108, 426\u2013436."},{"key":"ref_82","unstructured":"(2026, June 16). Community Preventive Services Task Force. Vaccination Programs: Provider Reminders. The Community Guide. Available online: https:\/\/www.thecommunityguide.org\/."},{"key":"ref_83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Louw, G.E., Hohlfeld, A.S.-J., Kalan, R., and Engel, M.E. (2024). Mobile Phone Text Message Reminders to Improve Vaccination Uptake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines, 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/vaccines12101151"},{"key":"ref_84","unstructured":"Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (2020). Effects of Digital Interventions for Promoting Vaccination Uptake, Cochrane EPOC."},{"key":"ref_85","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2022). Measuring Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination: Tools and Practical Guidance for Achieving High Uptake, World Health Organization."},{"key":"ref_86","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2016). Global Manual on Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Immunization, World Health Organization."},{"key":"ref_87","unstructured":"American Law Institute (1998). Restatement of the Law Third, American Law Institute Publishers. Available online: https:\/\/www.ali.org\/publications\/restatement-law-third\/torts-third."}],"container-title":["Vaccines"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-393X\/14\/8\/664\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T17:10:05Z","timestamp":1785345005000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-393X\/14\/8\/664"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]]},"references-count":87,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["vaccines14080664"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/vaccines14080664","relation":{},"ISSN":["2076-393X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2076-393X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]]}}}