{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T15:27:25Z","timestamp":1786116445478,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785974400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Vision"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in vision science are commonly evaluated using Cronbach\u2019s alpha, yet Rasch-based statistics may provide different information about their reliability. This study compared Cronbach\u2019s alpha, a Classical Test Theory (CTT) index, with Rasch person reliability and the person separation ratio across three vision-related questionnaires: the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD; n = 434), the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI; n = 294), and the Quality of Vision questionnaire (QoV; n = 288), using retrospective data from unselected clinical populations. Cronbach\u2019s alpha indicated acceptable internal consistency across all questionnaires (\u03b1 = 0.80\u20130.87), whereas Rasch person reliability was lower (0.62\u20130.80) and person separation ratios ranged from 1.29 to 2.00, indicating more limited discrimination. Item reliability was generally high (0.90\u20130.97) overall but declined in subgroups with restricted score variability. Discrepancies were most pronounced in the OSDI, where estimates approached their theoretical floor when subgroups were defined by the questionnaire\u2019s own scores. Cronbach\u2019s alpha and Rasch-based statistics are not interchangeable and capture different aspects of measurement precision: alpha may overestimate internal consistency, whereas person reliability and the separation ratio provide complementary information about discriminatory capacity. These findings support reporting both CTT and Rasch-based reliability statistics when evaluating vision-related PROMs in clinical populations.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/vision10030052","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T09:46:38Z","timestamp":1786009598000},"page":"52","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["When Cronbach\u2019s Alpha Is Not Enough: Implications for the Clinical Use of Vision-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0992-0877","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mario","family":"Cant\u00f3-Cerd\u00e1n","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Vissum (Miranza Group), 03016 Alicante, Spain"},{"name":"Grupo de Investigaci\u00f3n en Optometr\u00eda (GIOptom), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6817-6569","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mar\u00eda C.","family":"Mart\u00ednez-Hergueta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vissum (Miranza Group), 03016 Alicante, Spain"},{"name":"Ophthalmology Department, Hospital General de Elda, 03600 Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ana","family":"Siverio-Colomina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vissum (Miranza Group), 03016 Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pilar","family":"Y\u00e9bana-Rubio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vissum (Miranza Group), 03016 Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2666-3366","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jorge","family":"Ali\u00f3-del-Barrio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vissum (Miranza Group), 03016 Alicante, Spain"},{"name":"Division of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Universidad Miguel Hern\u00e1ndez, 03550 Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2992-6467","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pilar","family":"Cacho-Mart\u00ednez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Grupo de Investigaci\u00f3n en Optometr\u00eda (GIOptom), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3804-9048","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"\u00c1ngel","family":"Garc\u00eda-Mu\u00f1oz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Grupo de Investigaci\u00f3n en Optometr\u00eda (GIOptom), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5684-1090","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Antonio","family":"Mart\u00ednez-Abad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vissum (Miranza Group), 03016 Alicante, Spain"},{"name":"Grupo de Investigaci\u00f3n en Optometr\u00eda (GIOptom), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2010.09.020","article-title":"Vision-specific quality-of-life research: A need to improve the quality","volume":"151","author":"Lamoureux","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318141fe75","article-title":"The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires","volume":"84","author":"Pesudovs","year":"2007","journal-title":"Optom. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000000001","article-title":"Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: Review and recommendations","volume":"90","author":"Khadka","year":"2013","journal-title":"Optom. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02310555","article-title":"Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests","volume":"16","author":"Cronbach","year":"1951","journal-title":"Psychometrika"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1037\/1040-3590.8.4.350","article-title":"Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha","volume":"8","author":"Schmitt","year":"1996","journal-title":"Psychol. Assess."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1997.2702","article-title":"Alpha inflation? The impact of eliminating scale items on Cronbach\u2019s alpha","volume":"70","author":"Kopalle","year":"1997","journal-title":"Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process."},{"key":"ref_7","first-page":"516","article-title":"The measurement of vision disability","volume":"79","author":"Massof","year":"2002","journal-title":"Optom. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"I17","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlr.0000103522.78233.c3","article-title":"A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets","volume":"42","author":"Mallinson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Med. Care"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e838","DOI":"10.3109\/0142159X.2012.737488","article-title":"Psychometric evaluation of a knowledge based examination using Rasch analysis: An illustrative guide: AMEE guide no. 72","volume":"35","author":"Tavakol","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med. Teach."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tennant, A., and Kucukdeveci, A.A. (2023). Application of the Rasch measurement model in rehabilitation research and practice: Early developments, current practice, and future challenges. Front. Rehabil. Sci., 4.","DOI":"10.3389\/fresc.2023.1208670"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S22","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2004.7s106.x","article-title":"Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments","volume":"7","author":"Tennant","year":"2004","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1348\/000711006X115954","article-title":"Reliability if deleted, not \u2018alpha if deleted\u2019: Evaluation of scale reliability following component deletion","volume":"60","author":"Raykov","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.130814","article-title":"A systematic literature review on the application of Rasch analysis in musculoskeletal disease\u2014A special interest group report of OMERACT 11","volume":"41","author":"Leung","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Rheumatol."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2014.10.005","article-title":"Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: A comparison of worked examples","volume":"18","author":"Petrillo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5537","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.10-5341","article-title":"The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: The Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire","volume":"51","author":"McAlinden","year":"2010","journal-title":"Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14855","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-94166-9","article-title":"Rasch analysis for development and reduction of Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD)","volume":"11","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.11.2.7","article-title":"Validation of the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD): A questionnaire to evaluate symptoms of any type of visual dysfunctions","volume":"11","year":"2022","journal-title":"Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.118.5.615","article-title":"Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index","volume":"118","author":"Schiffman","year":"2000","journal-title":"Arch. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinthera.2014.04.006","article-title":"Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures","volume":"36","author":"Cappelleri","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin. Ther."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1002\/art.23108","article-title":"The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?","volume":"57","author":"Tennant","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum."},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"Wright, B.D., and Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis, MESA Press."}],"container-title":["Vision"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2411-5150\/10\/3\/52\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T10:27:09Z","timestamp":1786012029000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2411-5150\/10\/3\/52"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["vision10030052"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/vision10030052","relation":{},"ISSN":["2411-5150"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2411-5150","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]}}}