{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T09:23:14Z","timestamp":1768814594906,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,28]],"date-time":"2021-07-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627430400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Resources"],"abstract":"<jats:p>A wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) can be considered a system where dirty water enters and fresh water (by means of treatment processes) and other co-products such as sludge and biogas exit. Inside the system, typically, the following steps occur: preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary treatment, tertiary treatment, disinfection, and solids handling. The system transforms biomass into several energy and non-energy products, which fall into the definition of a biorefinery. This research compares three simulated WWTP in terms of their environmental greenhouse gas (GHG) emission release to the atmosphere: a generic one (without co-product valorization), one that converts co-products into fertilizer, heat, and electricity, and a third one that converts co-products into heat, electricity, fertilizer, and bioplastic. Heat and electricity are used to provide its energy needs. The chosen impact category is GHG, and the aim is to project the best scenario to the European context in terms of GHG avoidance (savings). The scope is the upstream electricity and natural gas production, the in-use emissions, and the avoided emissions by substituting equivalent fossil-based products. The functional unit is 1 L of sewage (\u201cdirty water\u201d). The GHG savings are evaluated by comparing a generic WWTP scenario, without co-product valorization, with alternative scenarios of co-product valorization. Conventional LCA assuming all the emissions occurs at instant zero is compared to a more realistic environment where for each year, the average of the variable emission pulses occurs. Variable emissions pulses are taken from variable inflows data publicly available from European COST actions (COST Action 682 \u201cIntegrated Wastewater Management\u201d as well as within the first IAWQ (later IWA) Task Group on respirometry-based control of the activated sludge process), within the later COST Action 624 on \u201cOptimal Management of Wastewater Systems\u201d). The GHG uncertainty is estimated based on the inputs benchmark data from the WWTP literature and by having different available global warming potential dynamic models. The conventional LCA versus dynamic LCA approach is discussed especially because a WWTP is by nature a dynamic system, having variable inputs along time and therefore variable output GHG emission pulses. It is concluded that heat needs are fully covered by biogas production in the anaerobic digester and combustion, covering its own energy needs and with a potential for heat district supply. Only 30\u201340% of electricity needs are covered by combined heat and power. Bioplastics and\/or fertilizer yields potentially represent less than 3% of current European needs, which suggests the need to reduce their consumption levels. In comparison to generic WWTP, GHG savings are 20%, considering the uncertainty in the benchmark input assumptions. The former is much higher than the uncertainty in the dynamic global warming potential model selection, which means that the model selection is not important in this case study.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/resources10080078","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,28]],"date-time":"2021-07-28T21:21:04Z","timestamp":1627507264000},"page":"78","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Greenhouse Gas Emission Assessment of Simulated Wastewater Biorefinery"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1439-9214","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carla","family":"Silva","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Instituto Dom Luiz, Departamento de Engenharia Geogr\u00e1fica, Geof\u00edsica e Energia, Faculdade de Ci\u00eancias, Universidade de Lisboa, 1250-096 Lisboa, Portugal"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"EurEau (2017). Europe\u2019s Water in Figures An Overview of the European Drinking Water and Waste Water Sectors, EurEau."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"Europe, Plastics (2015). Plastics the Facts 2014\/2015: An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data, Plastics Europe."},{"key":"ref_3","unstructured":"FAO (2015). World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2018, FAO."},{"key":"ref_4","unstructured":"Garcia, N.P., Vatopoulos, K., Krook-Riekkola, A., Rivera, J.A.M., and Lopez, A.P. (2012). Heat and Cooling Demand and Market Perspective, Publications Office of the European Union."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2017.12.232","article-title":"Greenhouse gas emissions from different sewage sludge treatment methods in north","volume":"177","author":"Piippo","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_6","unstructured":"Dong, B. (2012). Life-Cycle Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plants, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)."},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"RTI (2010). Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation Methodologies for Biogenic Emissions from Selected Source Categories: Solid Waste Disposal Wastewater Treatment Ethanol Fermentation, RTI."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1021\/es990003f","article-title":"Life cycle assessment of wastewater systems: Influence of system boundaries and scale on calculated environmental loads","volume":"34","author":"Lundin","year":"2000","journal-title":"Environ. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5997","DOI":"10.1016\/j.watres.2011.08.053","article-title":"Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants","volume":"45","author":"Hospido","year":"2011","journal-title":"Water Res."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.13044\/j.sdewes.2016.04.0018","article-title":"Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Water Treatment Plants in Ireland","volume":"4","author":"Greg","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Sustain. Dev. Energy Water Environ. Syst."},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"Bachmann, N., la Cour Jansen, J., Bochmann, G., and Montpart, N. (2015). Sustainable Biogas Production in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, IEA Bioenergy."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2011.11.030","article-title":"Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use","volume":"416","author":"Fine","year":"2012","journal-title":"Sci. Total Environ."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3300","DOI":"10.1021\/es802056r","article-title":"LCA as a Decision Support Tool for the Environmental Improvement of the Operation of a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant","volume":"43","author":"Pasqualino","year":"2009","journal-title":"Environ. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1016\/j.proenv.2012.01.372","article-title":"Composition of Waste Sludge from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant","volume":"12","author":"Tao","year":"2012","journal-title":"Procedia Environ. Sci."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pittmann, T., and Steinmetz, H. (2017). Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production on Waste Water Treatment Plants: Process Scheme, Operating Conditions and Potential Analysis for German and European Municipal Waste Water Treatment Plants. Bioengineering, 4.","DOI":"10.3390\/bioengineering4020054"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biortech.2010.06.154","article-title":"Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production","volume":"102","author":"Collet","year":"2011","journal-title":"Bioresour. Technol."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gernaey, K.V., Jeppsson, U., Vanrolleghem, P.A., and Copp, J.B. (2015). Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants, IWA Publishing.","DOI":"10.2166\/9781780401171"},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Rosen, C., and Jeppsson, U. (2008). Aspects on ADM1 Implementation within the BSM2 Framework, Lund University. Technical Reports."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1039\/C8EM00414E","article-title":"Methane emissions: Choosing the right climate metric and time horizon","volume":"20","author":"Balcombe","year":"2018","journal-title":"Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3169","DOI":"10.1021\/es9030003","article-title":"Considering time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments","volume":"44","author":"Levasseur","year":"2010","journal-title":"Environ. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D.W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D.C., and Myhre, G. (2007). Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing Chapter 2, Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2793","DOI":"10.5194\/acp-13-2793-2013","article-title":"Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics: A multi-model analysis","volume":"13","author":"Joos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Atmos. Chem. Phys."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"Edwards, R., Larive, J.-F., Rickeard, D., and Weindorf, W. (2013). Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context WELL-TO-TANK (WTT) Report. Version 4., Publications Office of the European Union."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eja.2015.06.001","article-title":"Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different fertilizer product types","volume":"69","author":"Hasler","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur. J. Agron."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.15255\/CABEQ.2014.2262","article-title":"LCA of PHA Production\u2014Identifying the Ecological Potential of Bio-plastic","volume":"29","author":"Narodoslawsky","year":"2015","journal-title":"Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q."},{"key":"ref_26","unstructured":"Patel, M., Bastioli, C., Marini, L., and W\u00fcrd, D.E. (2005). Biopolymers Online\u2014Environmental Assessment of Bio-Based Polymers and Natural Fibres, Utrecht University."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pacheco, R., and Silva, C. (2019). Global Warming Potential of Biomass-to-Ethanol: Review and Sensitivity Analysis through a Case Study. Energies, 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/en12132535"},{"key":"ref_28","unstructured":"Lindorfer, J., Lettner, M., Hesser, F., Fazeni, K., Rosenfeld, D., Annevelink, B., and Mandl, M. (2021, July 27). Technical, Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biorefinery Concepts. Available online: https:\/\/www.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/TEE_assessment_report_final_20190704-1.pdf."},{"key":"ref_29","unstructured":"JRC (2019). Deployment Scenarios for Low Carbon Energy Technologies, JRC."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"European Comission (2012). Towards Efficient Use of Water Resources in Europe."}],"container-title":["Resources"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2079-9276\/10\/8\/78\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T06:36:23Z","timestamp":1760164583000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2079-9276\/10\/8\/78"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,28]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["resources10080078"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/resources10080078","relation":{},"ISSN":["2079-9276"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2079-9276","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,28]]}}}