{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T06:15:05Z","timestamp":1790748905801,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,4]],"date-time":"2020-06-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1591228800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sustainability"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Electronic shopping is getting more and more popular, and it is not only clothes and electronics that people buy online, but groceries and household products too. Based on real-life data from a major cosmetics and household products retailer in the Czech Republic, this study set to assess the life cycle environmental impact of parcel delivery. Two archetype parcels containing common household and hygiene products were designed and packed in two distinct ways, and the environmental impact was quantified using the Life Cycle Assessment method. It showed that it is environmentally beneficial to use plastic cushions to insulate the goods instead of paper. However, the most important process contributing to the environmental burden was found to be electricity consumption in the logistics center. Hence, the importance of energy efficiency and efficient space utilization was demonstrated on alternative scenarios. Since the cardboard box the goods are packed in turned out to be another important contributor, an alternative scenario was designed where a reusable plastic crate was used instead. Even though the scenario was based on several simplistic assumptions, it showed a clear potential to be environmentally beneficial. In the study, contribution of other processes was scrutinized, as well as sensitivity to variation of parameters, e.g. transportation distances. The main scientific contribution of this work is to show the importance of logistics and distribution of products to end customers in the rapidly developing field of electronic retail of household products.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/su12114604","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,5]],"date-time":"2020-06-05T03:32:21Z","timestamp":1591327941000},"page":"4604","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Electronic Retail of Household Products"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"12","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9161-4160","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jan","family":"Matu\u0161t\u00edk","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Environmental Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technick\u00e1 5, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9428-8655","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vladim\u00edr","family":"Ko\u010d\u00ed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Environmental Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technick\u00e1 5, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic"},{"name":"Faculty of Architecture, Czech Technical University, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"(2020, February 10). Eurostat E-Commerce Statistics for Individuals. Available online: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/eurostat\/statistics-explained\/index.php\/E-commerce_statistics_for_individuals#General_overview."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"(2020, February 10). Ecommerce News Europe: 9.3 Billion Parcels in 2018. Available online: https:\/\/ecommercenews.eu\/europe-9-3-billion-parcels-in-2018\/."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weber, C.L., Hendrickson, C.T., Matthews, H.S., Nagengast, A., Nealer, R., and Jaramillo, P. (2009, January 18\u201320). Life cycle comparison of traditional retail and e-commerce logistics for electronic products: A case study of buy.com. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology, ISSST, Phoenix, AZ, USA.","DOI":"10.1109\/ISSST.2009.5156681"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1108\/09600031011018055","article-title":"Comparative analysis of the carbon footprints of conventional and online retailing: A \u201clast mile\u201d perspective","volume":"40","author":"Edwards","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hischier, R. (2018). Car vs. packaging-a first, simple (environmental) sustainability assessment of our changing shopping behaviour. Sustainability, 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/su10093061"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1016\/j.trd.2012.05.007","article-title":"Transport-related CO2 effects of online and brick-and-mortar shopping: A comparison and sensitivity analysis of clothing retailing","volume":"17","author":"Wiese","year":"2012","journal-title":"Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2016.05.054","article-title":"Online shopping habits and the potential for reductions in carbon dioxide emissions from passenger transport","volume":"131","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.trd.2016.09.015","article-title":"Urban form and last-mile goods movement: Factors affecting vehicle miles travelled and emissions","volume":"61","author":"Wygonik","year":"2018","journal-title":"Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1080\/17583004.2014.982395","article-title":"The growth of online retailing: A review of its carbon impacts","volume":"5","author":"McKinnon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Carbon Manag."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2014.06.060","article-title":"A comparative analysis of carbon emissions from online retailing of fast moving consumer goods","volume":"106","author":"Deketele","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2017.06.242","article-title":"Energy consumption in e-commerce versus conventional trade channels\u2014Insights into packaging, the last mile, unsold products and product returns","volume":"164","author":"Pettersson","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2014.01.045","article-title":"Reusable plastic crate or recyclable cardboard box? A comparison of two delivery systems","volume":"69","author":"Koskela","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/pts.946","article-title":"A comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable packaging for the distribution of Italian fruit and vegetables","volume":"24","author":"Levi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Packag. Technol. Sci."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tua, C., Biganzoli, L., Grosso, M., and Rigamonti, L. (2019). Life cycle assessment of reusable plastic crates (RPCs). Resources, 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/resources8020110"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1065\/lca2006.02.002","article-title":"The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044","volume":"11","author":"Finkbeiner","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int. J. Life Cycle Assess."},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"thinkstep (2020, February 28). GaBi ts-Software for Life Cycle Assessment. Available online: https:\/\/www.thinkstep.com\/software\/gabi-software\/gabi-professional."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"thinkstep (2020, February 28). GaBi LCA Databases. Available online: http:\/\/www.gabi-software.com\/international\/databases\/gabi-databases\/."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1007\/s11367-016-1087-8","article-title":"The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology","volume":"21","author":"Wernet","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. J. Life Cycle Assess."},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"CZSO (2020, February 28). Generation, Recovery and Disposal of Waste, Environment, Available online: www.czso.cz."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1007\/s11367-016-1246-y","article-title":"ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level","volume":"22","author":"Huijbregts","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Life Cycle Assess."},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"Ruimte en Milieu, M.V.V., and Ordening en Milieubeheer, R. (2009). ReCiPe 2008 A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level, RIVM. Available online: www.leidenuniv.nl."},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"(2020, February 28). IEA Czech Republic. Available online: https:\/\/www.iea.org\/countries\/czech-republic."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2588","DOI":"10.1016\/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025","article-title":"Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review","volume":"62","author":"Cole","year":"2011","journal-title":"Mar. Pollut. Bull."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190","article-title":"Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities","volume":"586","author":"Horton","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sci. Total Environ."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2019.05.372","article-title":"Life cycle assessment of carrier bags and development of a littering indicator","volume":"685","author":"Puig","year":"2019","journal-title":"Sci. Total Environ."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1177\/0013916511412179","article-title":"Littering in Context: Personal and Environmental Predictors of Littering Behavior","volume":"45","author":"Schultz","year":"2013","journal-title":"Environ. Behav."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.4018\/ijsesd.2014070104","article-title":"Some things are just made to be littered","volume":"5","author":"Crabb","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int. J. Soc. Ecol. Sustain. Dev."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apgeog.2017.04.010","article-title":"Plastic litter in streams: The behavioral archaeology of a pervasive environmental problem","volume":"84","author":"Carpenter","year":"2017","journal-title":"Appl. Geogr."}],"container-title":["Sustainability"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2071-1050\/12\/11\/4604\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T09:35:47Z","timestamp":1760175347000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2071-1050\/12\/11\/4604"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,4]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6]]}},"alternative-id":["su12114604"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su12114604","relation":{},"ISSN":["2071-1050"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2071-1050","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,4]]}}}