{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,3]],"date-time":"2026-08-03T19:43:20Z","timestamp":1785786200504,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Annals of Vascular Diseases","Ann Vasc Dis","AVD"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"DOI":"10.3400\/avd.oa.17-00088","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,16]],"date-time":"2017-11-16T22:12:48Z","timestamp":1510870368000},"page":"351-358","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Evaluation and Coil Embolization of the Aortic Side Branches for Prevention of Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm"],"prefix":"10.3400","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Atsushi","family":"Aoki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Showa University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kazuto","family":"Maruta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Showa University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norifumi","family":"Hosaka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Showa University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tadashi","family":"Omoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Showa University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tomoaki","family":"Masuda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Showa University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takehiko","family":"Gokan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Showa University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1983","reference":[{"key":"1","unstructured":"1) Mani K, Lees T, Beiles B, et al. Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in nine countries 2005\u20132009: a Vascunet report. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42<\/b>: 598-607."},{"key":"2","unstructured":"2) Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2013; 100<\/b>: 863-72."},{"key":"3","unstructured":"3) Sternbergh WC III, Greenberg RK, Chuter TA, et al. Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48<\/b>: 278-85."},{"key":"4","unstructured":"4) Houbballah R, Majewski M, Becquemin JP. Significant sac retraction after endovascular aneurysm repair is a robust indicator of durable treatment success. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52<\/b>: 878-83."},{"key":"5","unstructured":"5) Bastos Gon\u00e7alves F, Baderkhan H, Verhagen HJ, et al. Early sac shrinkage predicts a low risk of late complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2014; 101<\/b>: 802-10."},{"key":"6","unstructured":"6) van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJ, et al. Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27<\/b>: 128-37."},{"key":"7","unstructured":"7) Jones JE, Atkins MD, Brewster DC, et al. Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46<\/b>: 1-8."},{"key":"8","unstructured":"8) Sidloff DA, Gokani V, Stather PW, et al. Type II endoleak: conservative management is a safe strategy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48<\/b>: 391-9."},{"key":"9","unstructured":"9) Jouhannet C, Alsac JM, Julia P, et al. Reinterventions for type 2 endoleaks with enlargement of the aneurysm sac after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2014; 28<\/b>: 192-200."},{"key":"10","unstructured":"10) Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, et al. Treatment of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35<\/b>: 23-9."},{"key":"11","unstructured":"11) Aoki A, Suezawa T, Sangawa K, et al. Effect of type II endoleaks and antiplatelet therapy on abdominal aortic aneurysm shrinkage after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54<\/b>: 947-51."},{"key":"12","unstructured":"12) Engellau L, Larsson EM, Albrechtsson U, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and MR angiography of endoluminal treated abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15<\/b>: 212-9."},{"key":"13","unstructured":"13) Cornelissen SA, Verhagen HJM, von Herwaarden JA, et al. Lack of thrombus organization in nonshrinking aneurysms years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56<\/b>: 938-42."},{"key":"14","unstructured":"14) Vallabhaneni SR, Gilling-Smith GL, Brennan JA, et al. Can intrasac pressure monitoring reliably predict failure of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2003; 10<\/b>: 524-30."},{"key":"15","unstructured":"15) Aoki A, Suezawa T, Yamamoto S, et al. Effect of antifibrinolytic therapy with tranexamic acid on abdominal aortic aneurysm shrinkage after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59<\/b>: 1203-8."},{"key":"16","unstructured":"16) Otsu M, Ishizaka T, Watanabe M, et al. Analysis of anatomical risk factors for persistent type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using CT angiography. Surg Today 2016; 46<\/b>: 48-55."},{"key":"17","unstructured":"17) Marchiori A, von Ristow A, Guimaraes M, et al. Predictive factors for the development of type II endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther 2011; 18<\/b>: 299-305."},{"key":"18","unstructured":"18) El Batti S, Cochennec F, Roudot-Thoraval F, et al. Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm are not always a benign condition. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57<\/b>: 1291-7."},{"key":"19","unstructured":"19) Ward TJ, Cohen S, Patel RS, et al. Anatomic risk factors for type-2 endoleak following EVAR: a retrospective review of preoperative CT angiography in 326 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014; 37<\/b>: 324-8."},{"key":"20","unstructured":"20) Couchet G, Pereira B, Carrieres C, et al. Predictive factors for type II endoleaks after treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm by conventional endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2015; 29<\/b>: 1673-9."},{"key":"21","unstructured":"21) M\u00fcller-Wille R, Schotz S, Zeman F, et al. CT features of early type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms help predict aneurysm sac enlargement. Radiology 2015; 274<\/b>: 906-16."},{"key":"22","unstructured":"22) Demehri S, Signorelli J, Kumamaru KK, et al. Volumetric quantification of type II endoleaks: an indicator for aneurysm sac growth following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology 2014; 271<\/b>: 282-90."},{"key":"23","unstructured":"23) Parry DJ, Kessel DO, Robertson I, et al. Type II endoleaks: predictable, preventable, and sometimes treatable? J Vasc Surg 2002; 36<\/b>: 105-10."},{"key":"24","unstructured":"24) Burbelko M, Kalinowski M, Heverhagen JT, et al. Prevention of type II endoleak using the Amplatzer vascular plug before endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47<\/b>: 28-36."},{"key":"25","unstructured":"25) Ward TJ, Cohen S, Fischman AM, et al. Preoperative inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair: decreased incidence of type II endoleak and aneurysm sac enlargement with 24-month follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24<\/b>: 49-55."},{"key":"26","unstructured":"26) M\u00fcller-Wille R, Uller W, G\u00f6ssmann H, et al. Inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using Amplatzer vascular plug type 4. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014; 37<\/b>: 928-34."},{"key":"27","unstructured":"27) Quinones-Baldrich W, Levin ES, Lew W, et al. Intraprocedural and postprocedural perigraft arterial sac embolization (PASE) for endoleak treatment. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59<\/b>: 538-41."},{"key":"28","unstructured":"28) Fabre D, Fadel E, Brenot P, et al. Type II endoleak prevention with coil embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62<\/b>: 1-7."},{"key":"29","unstructured":"29) Piazza M, Squizzato F, Zavatta M, et al. Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair with contemporary volume-dependent sac embolization in patients at risk for type II endoleak. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63<\/b>: 32-8."},{"key":"30","unstructured":"30) Bastos Gon\u00e7alves F, van de Luijtgaarden KM, Hoeks SE, et al. Adequate seal and no endoleak on the first postoperative computed tomography angiography as criteria for no additional imaging up to 5 years after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57<\/b>: 1503-11."}],"container-title":["Annals of Vascular Diseases"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/avd\/10\/4\/10_oa.17-00088\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,7]],"date-time":"2018-04-07T04:51:56Z","timestamp":1523076716000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/avd\/10\/4\/10_oa.17-00088\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3400\/avd.oa.17-00088","relation":{},"ISSN":["1881-641X","1881-6428"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1881-641X","type":"print"},{"value":"1881-6428","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}}}