{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,8]],"date-time":"2024-08-08T20:30:56Z","timestamp":1723149056103},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Annals of Vascular Diseases","Ann Vasc Dis","AVD"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,25]]},"DOI":"10.3400\/avd.ra.19-00070","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,17]],"date-time":"2019-07-17T18:03:02Z","timestamp":1563386582000},"page":"319-322","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Updates on Ultrasonography Imaging in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm"],"prefix":"10.3400","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Shinichi","family":"Iwakoshi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Toshiko","family":"Hirai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kimihiko","family":"Kichikawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1983","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1) Takagi H, Ando T, Umemoto T. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening reduces all-cause mortality: make screening great again. Angiology 2018; <b>69<\/b>: 205-11.","DOI":"10.1177\/0003319717693107"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2) Thompson SG, Ashton HA, Gao L, et al. Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. Br J Surg 2012; <b>99<\/b>: 1649-56.","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8897"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3) Darwood R, Earnshaw JJ, Turton G, et al. Twenty-year review of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men in the county of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom. J Vasc Surg 2012; <b>56<\/b>: 8-13.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2011.12.069"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4) Hafez H, Druce PS, Ashton HA. Abdominal aortic aneurysm development in men following a \u201cnormal\u201d aortic ultrasound scan. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; <b>36<\/b>: 553-8.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2008.06.032"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5) Bihari P, Shelke A, Nwe TH, et al. Strain measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysm with real-time 3D ultrasound speckle tracking. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; <b>45<\/b>: 315-23.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2013.01.004"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6) Derwich W, Wittek A, Pfister K, et al. High resolution strain analysis comparing aorta and abdominal aortic aneurysm with real time three dimensional speckle tracking ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; <b>51<\/b>: 187-93.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2015.07.042"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7) Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years\u2019 follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; <b>388<\/b>: 2366-74.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31135-7"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8) Guo Q, Du X, Zhao J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2017; <b>12<\/b>: e0170600.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0170600"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9) Brazzelli M, Hern\u00e1ndez R, Sharma P, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and\/or colour duplex ultrasound for surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2018; <b>22<\/b>: 1-220.","DOI":"10.3310\/hta22720"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10) Chisci E, Setacci F, Iacoponi F, et al. Surveillance imaging modality does not affect detection rate of asymptomatic secondary interventions following EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; <b>43<\/b>: 276-81.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2011.11.020"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11) Chung J, Kordzadeh A, Prionidis I, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) versus computed tomography angiography (CTA) in detection of endoleaks in post-EVAR patients. Are delayed type II endoleaks being missed? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound 2015; <b>18<\/b>: 91-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s40477-014-0154-x"}],"container-title":["Annals of Vascular Diseases"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/avd\/12\/3\/12_ra.19-00070\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,27]],"date-time":"2019-09-27T23:49:53Z","timestamp":1569628193000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/avd\/12\/3\/12_ra.19-00070\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,25]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3400\/avd.ra.19-00070","relation":{},"ISSN":["1881-641X","1881-6428"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1881-641X","type":"print"},{"value":"1881-6428","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,25]]}}}