{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,15]],"date-time":"2022-11-15T06:12:02Z","timestamp":1668492722025},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"ALUNA","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Wiad Lek"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The aim: To compare the pain in patients with combined pathology of the anal canal and rectum after combined operations using modern high-frequency electrosurgical and radio-surgical devices and a conventional metal scalpel. \nMaterials and methods: The results of treatment of 635 patients with combined pathology of the anal canal and rectum using high-frequency electrosurgery and radio-wave surgery, which were divided into 4 study groups, as well as 112 patients using a metal surgical scalpel were analyzed. \nResults: Assessing the pain syndrome on the first day of the postoperative period, it was found that it was most pronounced in control group patients, where the need for anal\u00acgesia 2 % promedol solution was 4\u00b11 ml and in the first, third and fourth study groups patients needed for analgesia 2\u00b11 ml of 2 % promedol solution when using \u201cSurgitron\u201d radio-wave surgery device, \u201cEFA\u201d and \u201cKLS Martin\u201d high-frequency electrosurgical devices respectively. When using device \u201cERBE ICC 200\u201d, the need for a 2 % promedol solution for analgesia was 3\u00b11 ml. \nConclusions: Using of radio-wave surgery device and high-frequency electrosurgery devices is much better compared to the use of a surgical metal scalpel because they cause much less pain due to the formation of a thin layer of coagulation necrosis, promoting the formation of a delicate elastic scar and preventing formation of scar anal strictures.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.36740\/wlek202209211","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,14]],"date-time":"2022-11-14T20:28:32Z","timestamp":1668457712000},"page":"2238-2243","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["PAIN SYNDROME IN PATIENTS AFTER COMBINED OPERATIONS FOR COMBINED ANORECTAL DISEASES USING MODERN SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES"],"prefix":"10.36740","volume":"75","author":[{"given":"Vitaliy V.","family":"Balytskyy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"VINNYTSIA NATIONAL M.I. PIROGOV MEMORIAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, VINNYTSIA, UKRAINE; PUBLIC NON-PROFIT ENTERPRISE \u201cKHMELNYTSKYI REGIONAL HOSPITAL\u201d, UNDER KHMELNYTSKYI REGIONAL COUNCIL, KHMELNYTSKYI, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"22436","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"1. Wald A., Bharucha A.E., Cosman B.C. et al. ACG clinical guideline: management of benign anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(8):1141\u20131157. doi: 10.1038\/ajg.2014.190.","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2014.190"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2. Borota A.V., Kuhto A.P., Bazijan-Kuhto N.K. et al. Sravniteln\u0456j analiz hirurgicheskogo lechenija sochetannoj neopuholevoj patologii analnogo kanala i prjamoj kishki [Comparative analysis of surgical treatment of the combined non-tumor anorectal pathology]. Novoobrazovanie (Neoplasm). 2018;10(1):18\u201321. doi: 10.26435\/neoplasm.v10i1.242. (In Russian).","DOI":"10.26435\/neoplasm.v10i1.242"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"3. Medina-Gallardo A., Curbelo-Pe\u00f1a Y., De Castro X. et al. Is the severe pain after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy still currently remaining a major postoperative problem despite being one of the oldest surgical techniques described? A case series of 117 consecutive patients. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:73\u201375. doi: 10.1016\/j.ijscr.2016.11.018.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijscr.2016.11.018"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"4. Bhatti M.I., Sajid M.S., Baig M.K. Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus ferguson haemorrhoidectomy (closed): a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized, controlled trials. World J Surg. 2016;40(6):1509-19. doi: 10.1007\/s00268-016-3419-z.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-016-3419-z"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"5. Emile S.H., Youssef M., Elfeki H. et al. Literature review of the role of lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) when combined with excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(7):1261-1272. doi: 10.1007\/s00384-016-2603-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-016-2603-9"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"6. Nystr\u00f6m P.O., Qvist N., Raahave D. et al. Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse. Br J Surg. 2010;97(2):167\u2013176. doi: 10.1002\/bjs.6804.","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6804"},{"key":"ref6","unstructured":"7. Papis D., Parodi M., Herrer\u00edas F. et al. Ligasure vs conventional diathermy in excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a retrospective study of a single center. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2013;43(4):284\u2013287."},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"8. Bakhtiar N., Moosa F.A., Jaleel F. et al. Comparison of hemorrhoidectomy by Liga Sure with conventional Milligan Morgan\u2019s hemorrhoidectomy. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(3):657\u2013661. doi: 10.12669\/pjms.323.9976.","DOI":"10.12669\/pjms.323.9976"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"9. Yang J., Cui P.J., Han H.Z. et al. Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs Liga Sure hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(29):4799-807. doi: 10.3748\/wjg.v19.i29.4799.","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v19.i29.4799"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"10. Chen C.W., Lai C.W., Chang Y.J. et al. Modified Liga Sure hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of hemorrhoidal crisis. Surg Today. 2014;44(6):1056\u2013 1062. doi: 10.1007\/s00595-013-0650-1.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-013-0650-1"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"11. Haksal M.C., \u00c7iftci A., Tiryaki \u00c7. et al. Comparison of the reliability and efficacy of Liga Sure hemorrhoidectomy and a conventional Milligan- Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the surgical treatment of grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids. Turk J Surg. 2017;33(4):233-236. doi: 10.5152\/ turkjsurg.2017.3493.","DOI":"10.5152\/turkjsurg.2017.3493"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"12. Xu L., Chen H., Lin G. et al. Ligasure versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25(2):106-110. doi: 10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000136.","DOI":"10.1097\/sle.0000000000000136"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"13. Mushaya C.D., Caleo P.J., Bartlett L. et al. Harmonic scalpel compared with conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(11):1009-1016. doi: 10.1007\/s10151-014-1169-1.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-014-1169-1"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"14. Tsunoda A., Takahashi T., Kusanagi H. A prospective randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus ultrasonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(8):657\u2013665. doi: 10.1007\/s10151-017-1673-1.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-017-1673-1"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"15. Lim D.R., Cho D.H., Lee J.H. et al. Comparison of a Hemorrhoidectomy With Ultrasonic Scalpel Versus a Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy. Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(3):111-116. doi: 10.3393\/ac.2016.32.3.111.","DOI":"10.3393\/ac.2016.32.3.111"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"16. Esfahani M.N., Madani G., Madhkhan S. A novel method of anal fissure laser surgery: a pilot study. Laser Med Sci. 2015;30:1711\u20131717. doi: 10.1007\/s10103-015-1771-0.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10103-015-1771-0"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"17. De Nardi P., Tamburini A.M., Gazzetta P.G. et al. Hemorrhoid laser procedure for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids: results from a multicenter prospective study. Tech.Coloproctol. 2016;20(7):455-59. doi: 10.1007\/s10151-016-1479-6.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-016-1479-6"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"18. Naderan M., Shoar S., Nazari M. et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing laser intra-hemorrhoidal coagulation and Milligan- Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. J Invest Surg. 2017;30(5):325-331. doi: 10.1080\/08941939.2016.1248304.","DOI":"10.1080\/08941939.2016.1248304"}],"container-title":["Wiadomo\u015bci Lekarskie"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,14]],"date-time":"2022-11-14T20:28:36Z","timestamp":1668457716000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/wiadlek.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/archive\/2022\/09\/WLek202209211.pdf"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.36740\/wlek202209211","archive":["Internet Archive"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0043-5147"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0043-5147","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}}}