{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T01:39:40Z","timestamp":1785116380781,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"ALUNA","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Wiad Lek"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The aim: To assess and compare the risk of maternal\/perinatal complications and adverse outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth conceived by ART with those conceived naturally in Ukraine.\nMaterials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study from January 1st, 2019 to December 31st, 2021. This study included pregnant women who delivered at 14 Women\u2019s Hospitals from 8 regions of Ukraine.\nResults: A total of 21,162 pregnancies were included. Of these, there were 19,801 natural pregnancies and 1,361 pregnancies after ART. The proportion of ART. pregnancies has increased every year in during study period, peaking in 2021 (6.7%). Data analysis showed that the risks of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, moderate or severe anemia, liver-related diseases, thyroid-related diseases, preterm birth, placenta previa, postpartum hemorrhage, and cesarean section were significantly increased in ART pregnancy. For neonatal outcomes, women conceived by ART were more likely to have twins. The effects of ART on the risk of premature rupture of membrane, cord entanglement, intrapartum fever, and cesarean section were more pronounced in singletons pregnancies. \nConclusions: Women conceived by ART were at increased risks of several adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with women conceived naturally. Therefore, prenatal and intrapartum monitoring should be strengthened, and neonatal outcomes should be closely observed for ART pregnancy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.36740\/wlek202304101","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,25]],"date-time":"2023-05-25T18:07:43Z","timestamp":1685038063000},"page":"695-702","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["PREGNANCY AND BIRTH OUTCOMES IN FEMALE WITH AND WITHOUT ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN UKRAINE"],"prefix":"10.36740","volume":"76","author":[{"given":"Aidyn G.","family":"Salmanov","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"SHUPYK NATIONAL HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE; INSTITUTE OF PEDIATRICS, OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Svitlana M.","family":"Korniyenko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"ODESA NATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, ODESA, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Uliana V.","family":"Pavlyk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"PRECARPATHIAN CENTRE OF HUMAN REPRODUCTION, IVANO-FRANKIVSK, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ihor","family":"Paliga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"ANDREI KRUPYNSKYI LVIV MEDICAL ACADEMY, LVIV, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anastasia S.","family":"Padchenko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"KYIV PERINATAL CENTER, KYIV, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oleg A.","family":"Berestooy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"MOTHERS MEDICAL CENTER, KYIV, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Olena M.","family":"Susidko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"MEDICAL CENTER DR. NIKOLAEV, DNIPRO, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"22436","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"1. Sun H., Gong T-T., Jiang Y-T. et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years for infertility in 195 countries and territories, 1990\u20132017: results from a global burden of disease study, 2017. Aging. 2019;11(3):10952\u201391. doi: 10.18632\/aging.102497.","DOI":"10.18632\/aging.102497"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"2. Mascarenhas M.N., Flaxman S.R., Boerma T. et al. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med 2012;9(12):e1001356. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001356.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001356"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"3. Salmanov A.G., Vitiuk A.D., Kovalyshyn O.A. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of infertility in Ukraine: results a multicenter study (2019-2021). Wiad Lek. 2022;75(5):1058-1065. doi: 10.36740\/WLek202205202.","DOI":"10.36740\/wlek202205202"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"4. De Geyter C., Calhaz-Jorge C., Kupka M.S. et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1586-1601. doi: 10.1093\/humrep\/dey242.","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa038"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"5. Luke B. Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):270-281. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.03.012.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.03.012"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"6. Malchau S.S., Loft A., Larsen E.C. Perinatal outcomes in 375 children born after oocyte donation: a Danish national cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1637-43. doi: 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.128.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.128"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"7. Fujii M., Matsuoka R., Bergel E. et al. Perinatal risk in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2113-7. doi: 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.12.031.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.12.031"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"8. Tai W., Hu L., Wen J. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes After Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:837762. doi: 10.3389\/fmed.2022.837762.","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2022.837762"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"9. Pinborg A., Wennerholm U.B., Romundstad L.B. et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(2):87-104. doi: 10.1093\/humupd\/dms044.","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dms044"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"10. Hansen M., Kurinczuk J.J., de Klerk N. et al. Assisted reproductive technology and major birth defects in Western Australia. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):852-63. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318269c282.","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0b013e318269c282"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"11. Marino J.L., Moore V.M., Willson K.J. et al. Perinatal outcomes by mode of assisted conception and sub-fertility in an Australian data linkage cohort. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e80398. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0080398.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0080398"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"12. Jackson S., Hong C., Wang E.T. et al. Pregnancy outcomes in very advanced maternal age pregnancies: the impact of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.09.037.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.09.037"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"13. Seggers J., Pontesilli M., Ravelli A.C.J. et al. Effects of in vitro fertilization and maternal characteristics on perinatal outcomes: a populationbased study using siblings. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(3):590-598.e2. doi: 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.11.015.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.11.015"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"14. Nagata C., Yang L., Yamamoto-Hanada K. et al. Complications and adverse outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among women who conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: a nationwide birth cohort study of Japan environment and children\u2019s study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186\/s12884-019-2213-y.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2213-y"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"15. Vermey B.G., Buchanan A., Chambers G.M. et al. Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019;126(2):209-218. doi: 10.1111\/1471-0528.15227.","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15227"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"16. Qin J., Liu X., Sheng X. et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73-85.e1-6. doi: 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"17. Geisler M.E., O\u2019Mahony A., Meaney S. et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived following IVF\/ICSI treatment compared with spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:78-83. doi: 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.07.033.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.07.033"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18. Okun N., Sierra S., Genetics C. et al. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30685-X.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30685-X"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"19. De Neubourg D., Gerris J., Mangelschots K. et al. The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(4):1041-6. doi: 10.1093\/humrep\/dei424.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei424"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"20. Chambers G.M., Dyer S., Zegers-Hochschild F. et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(11):2921-2934. doi: 10.1093\/humrep\/deab198.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab198"},{"key":"ref20","unstructured":"21. Leridon H. Biological Effects of First Birth Postponement and Assisted Reproductive Technology on Completed Fertility. Population. 2017;72(3):445\u2013472. doi: 10.3917\/pope.1703.0445."},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"22. McCarter K., Setton R., Chung A. et al. Is increasing paternal age negatively associated with donor oocyte recipient success? A paired analysis using sibling oocytes. Fertility and Sterility. 2021;116(2):373\u2013379. doi: 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.03.037.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.03.037"}],"container-title":["Wiadomo\u015bci Lekarskie"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,30]],"date-time":"2023-06-30T10:00:50Z","timestamp":1688119250000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/wiadlek.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/archive\/2023\/WLek202304.pdf"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.36740\/wlek202304101","archive":["Internet Archive"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0043-5147"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0043-5147","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}}}