{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T02:01:49Z","timestamp":1767837709076,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"ALUNA","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Wiad Lek"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The aim: To obtain the first national estimates of the current prevalence rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) after caesarean section (CSEC) and antimicrobial resistance of causing pathogens in Ukraine. \nMaterials and methods: Prospective multicentre surveillance was conducted from January 2020 to December 2022 in 15 women hospitals of Ukraine. Definitions of CAUTIs were adapted from the CDC\/NHSN. Antibiotic susceptibility was done by the disc diffusion test as recommended by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. \nResults: A total of 15,892 catheterized women undergoing primary CSEC and 13.6% CAUTI were identified. The most common uropathogen was Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterococcus species followed by Providencia stuartii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Many uropathogens isolated from CAUTI cases were found to be multidrug resistant. \nConclusions: This study showed that CAUTIs in catheterized women undergoing primary CSEC in Ukraine is a common occurrence and many cases are caused by pathogens that are resistant to antibiotics. Optimizing the management and empirical antimicrobial therapy may reduce the burden of CAUTIs in catheterized women undergoing primary CSEC, but prevention is the key element.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.36740\/wlek202306101","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,19]],"date-time":"2023-07-19T12:18:27Z","timestamp":1689769107000},"page":"1325-1331","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["CATHETER-ASSOCIATED URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION IN UKRAINE: RESULTS A MULTICENTER STUDY (2020-2022)"],"prefix":"10.36740","volume":"76","author":[{"given":"Aidyn G.","family":"Salmanov","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"SHUPYK NATIONAL HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE; INSTITUTE OF PEDIATRICS, OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Volodymyr","family":"Artyomenko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"ODESA NATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, ODESA, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Olena M.","family":"Susidko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"DOCTOR NIKOLAEV MEDICAL CENTER, DNIPRO, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Svitlana M.","family":"Korniyenko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"ODESA NATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, ODESA, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Orusia A.","family":"Kovalyshyn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"LVIV MEDICAL INSTITUTE, LVIV, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Oleksandr A.","family":"Voloshyn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"SHUPYK NATIONAL HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE; KYIV REGIONAL MATERNITY HOSPITAL, KYIV, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Oleg V.","family":"Golyanovskiy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"SHUPYK NATIONAL HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE; KYIV REGIONAL MATERNITY HOSPITAL, KYIV, UKRAINE"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"22436","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"1. Gastmeier P, Kampf G, Wischnewski N et al. Prevalence of nosocomial infections in representative German hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 1998;38(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016\/s0195-6701(98)90173-6.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0195-6701(98)90173-6"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"2. Wagenlehner FM, Naber KG. Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections. J Hosp Infect. 2000;46(3):171-81. doi: 10.1053\/jhin.2000.0821.","DOI":"10.1053\/jhin.2000.0821"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"3. Salmanov A, Shchehlov D, Svyrydiuk O et al. Epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance of responsible pathogens in Ukraine: a multicentre study. J Hosp Infect. 2023;131:129-138. doi: 10.1016\/j.jhin.2022.10.007.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhin.2022.10.007"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"4. Tissot E, Limat S, Cornette C et al. Risk factors for catheter-associated bacteriuria in a medical intensive care unit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001;20(4):260-2. doi: 10.1007\/s100960100480.","DOI":"10.1007\/s100960100480"},{"key":"ref4","unstructured":"5. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2009. http:\/\/who.int\/whosis\/whostat\/2009\/en\/index.html. [date access 14.02.2023]."},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"6. Pandey D, Mehta S, Grover A et al. Indwelling Catheterization in Caesarean Section: Time To Retire It! J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(9):QC01-4. doi: 10.7860\/JCDR\/2015\/13495.6415.","DOI":"10.7860\/jcdr\/2015\/13495.6415"},{"key":"ref6","unstructured":"7. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. https:\/\/apps.who.int\/iris\/bitstream\/handle\/10665\/161442\/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng. pdf?sequence=1 [date access 14.02.2023]."},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"8. Kawakita T, Landy HJ. Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery: epidemiology, prevention and treatment. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017; 3: 12. doi: 10.1186\/s40748-017-0051-3.","DOI":"10.1186\/s40748-017-0051-3"},{"key":"ref8","unstructured":"9. Eurostat. Caesarean births in the EU Member States. https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/eurostat\/web\/products-eurostat-news\/-\/DDN-20191217-1 [date access 14.02.2023]."},{"key":"ref9","unstructured":"10. Li Z, Zeki R, Hilder L, Sullivan EA. Australia\u2019s mothers and babies 2011. Perinatal statistics series no. 28. Cat. no. PER 59. Canberra: AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. 2013. https:\/\/www.aihw.gov.au\/getmedia\/265f3a72-1ea2-4bff-8a44- b16ca55d00f4\/15639.pdf.aspx?inline=true. [date access 14.02.2023]."},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"11. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, G\u00fclmezoglu AM et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490-9. doi: 10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61870-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(09)61870-5"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"12. Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol .2007;21:98\u2013113. doi:10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"13. Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335(7628):1025. doi: 10.1136\/bmj.39363.706956.55.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39363.706956.55"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"14. Salmanov AG, Vitiuk AD, Ishchak OM et al. Surgical site infection after cesarean section in Ukraine: results a multicenter study. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(4):934-939. doi: 10.36740\/WLek202104123.","DOI":"10.36740\/wlek202104123"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"15. Raka L, Mulliqi-Osmani G, Berisha L et al. Etiology and susceptibility of urinary tract isolates in Kosova. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;23(1):S2-5. doi: 10.1016\/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.009.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.009"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"16. Sabir S, Ahmad Anjum A, Ijaz T et al. Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli from urinary tract infections in a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(2):389-92.","DOI":"10.12669\/pjms.302.4289"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"17. El-Mazny A, El-Sharkawy M, Hassan A. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter following elective cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:111-4. doi: 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.07.034.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.07.034"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"18. Cantone D, Pelullo CP, Cancellieri M et al. Can antenatal classes reduce the rate of cesarean section in southern Italy? Women Birth. 2017;30(2):e83-e88. doi: 10.1016\/j.wombi.2016.09.004.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2016.09.004"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"19. Menshawy A, Ghanem E, Menshawy E et al. Early versus delayed removal of indwelling urinary catheter after elective cesarean delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(16):2818-2825. doi: 10.1080\/14767058.2018.1557142.","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1557142"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"20. Nakawuki AW, Nekaka R, Ssenyonga LVN et al. Bacterial colonization, species diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of indwelling urinary catheters from postpartum mothers attending a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern Uganda. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0262414. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0262414.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0262414"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"21. Basbug A, Yuksel A, Ellibe\u015f et al. Early versus delayed removal of indwelling catheters in patients after elective cesarean section: a prospective randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(1):68-72. doi: 10.1080\/14767058.2018.1487394.","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1487394"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"22. Onile TG, Kuti O, Orji EO et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial of urethral catheter removal following elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102(3):267-70. doi: 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.04.020.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.04.020"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"23. Pandey D, Mehta S, Grover A et al. Indwelling Catheterization in Caesarean Section: Time To Retire It! J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(9):QC01-4. doi: 10.7860\/JCDR\/2015\/13495.6415.","DOI":"10.7860\/jcdr\/2015\/13495.6415"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"24. Hou D, Jia Y, Han A et al. Effect of urinary catheter removal at different times after caesarean section: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;280:160-167. doi: 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.002.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.002"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"25. Salmanov A, Shchehlov D, Artyomenko V et al. Nosocomial transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms in Ukrainian hospitals: results of a multi-centre study (2019-2021). J Hosp Infect. 2022;132:104-115. doi: 10.1016\/j.jhin.2022.12.008.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhin.2022.12.008"}],"container-title":["Wiadomo\u015bci Lekarskie"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,19]],"date-time":"2023-07-19T12:24:52Z","timestamp":1689769492000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/wiadlek.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/archive\/2023\/WiadLek2023i6.pdf"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.36740\/wlek202306101","archive":["Internet Archive"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0043-5147"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0043-5147","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}}}