{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T14:33:13Z","timestamp":1792420393544,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.","issue":"11","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["WJG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,21]]},"DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v21.i11.3351","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,17]],"date-time":"2017-09-17T23:09:13Z","timestamp":1505689753000},"page":"3351-3360","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":51,"title":["Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis"],"prefix":"10.3748","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Wen","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jing-Jia","family":"Mo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Li","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chao-Qun","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jian-Feng","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2060","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mitchell SA, Jacyna MR, Chadwick S. Common bile duct stones: a controversy revisited. Br J Surg 1993;80:759-760.","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800800635"},{"key":"ref2","unstructured":"Del Santo P, Kazarian KK, Rogers JF, Bevins PA, Hall JR. Prediction of operative cholangiography in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy with routine liver function chemistries. Surgery 1985;98:7-11."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne H, Lee MJ. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 1999;54:604-614.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0009-9260(99)90023-5"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Montariol T, Msika S, Charlier A, Rey C, Bataille N, Hay JM, Lacaine F, Fingerhut A. Diagnosis of asymptomatic common bile duct stones: preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography--a multicenter, prospective controlled study. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 1998;124:6-13.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6060(98)70068-6"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, Fried R, Zuber M, Harder F. Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg 2000;135:148-152.","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.135.2.148"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, De Bernardin M, Ederle A, Fina P, Fratton A. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(98)70121-X"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609263351301"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2001.03594.x"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1068-1075.","DOI":"10.1016\/0016-5085(91)90735-4"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amouyal P, Amouyal G, Lévy P, Tuzet S, Palazzo L, Vilgrain V, Gayet B, Belghiti J, Fékété F, Bernades P. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 1994;106:1062-1067.","DOI":"10.1016\/0016-5085(94)90768-4"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, Silvain C, Roseau G, Canard JM, Chaussade S, Couturier D, Paolaggi JA. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:225-231.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(95)70096-X"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1005735"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:143-146.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(97)70237-2"},{"key":"ref14","unstructured":"Brisbois D, Plomteux O, Nchimi A, Hock D, Dupont P, Delforge M, Bastens B, Weerts J, Magotteaux P. [Value of MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis in symptomatic patients: one-year experience with a standardized high resolution breath-hold technique]. JBR-BTR 2001;84:258-261."},{"key":"ref15","unstructured":"Sperlongano P, Pisaniello D, Del Viscovo L, De Falco M, Parmeggiani D, Piatto A, Parmeggiani U. Efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in detecting common bile duct lithiasis: our experience. Chir Ital 2005;57:635-640."},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.200.1.8657949"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, Pelletier G, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Buffet C, Etienne JP. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis. Lancet 1996;347:75-79.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(96)90208-1"},{"key":"ref18","unstructured":"Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J 2003;44:635-638."},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-3-25"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, Bezemer PD. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002;2:9.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-2-9"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mem.2001.114903"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993;12:1293-1316.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780121403"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis C, Lau J, Colditz G, Chalmers TC, Mosteller F. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:667-676.","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-120-8-199404150-00008"},{"key":"ref24","unstructured":"Vamvakas EC. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:675-686."},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2003.09.017"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-20"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-004-2167-6"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2472070473"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-007-9304-3"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00365521.2011.638394"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-013-2179-4"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2012.07.033"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1746.2006.04503.x"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00534-011-0456-8"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/apt.12481"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2342-6-9"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2005.12.038"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11569\/wcjd.v21.i19.1811"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/crad.1999.0426"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2001.04245.x"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hochwald SN, Dobryansky M BA, Rofsky NM, Naik KS, Shamamian P, Coppa G, Marcus SG. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately predicts the presence or absence of choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:573-579.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1091-255X(98)80059-0"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boraschi P, Neri E, Braccini G, Gigoni R, Caramella D, Perri G, Bartolozzi C. Choledocolithiasis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Three-year experience. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1245-1253.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0730-725X(99)00075-2"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de Lédinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J, Couzigou P, Silvain C. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:26-31.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(99)70441-4"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lomas DJ, Bearcroft PW, Gimson AE. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1411-1417.","DOI":"10.1007\/s003300050859"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, Osborne H, Murray FE, Lee MJ. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease. Clin Radiol 1999;54:513-520.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0009-9260(99)90848-6"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stiris MG, Tennøe B, Aadland E, Lunde OC. MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiol 2000;41:269-272.","DOI":"10.1080\/028418500127345226"},{"key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mge.2002.120324"},{"key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4025"},{"key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-1433.2004.03114.x"},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simone M, Mutter D, Rubino F, Dutson E, Roy C, Soler L, Marescaux J. Three-dimensional virtual cholangioscopy: a reliable tool for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 2004;240:82-88.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000129493.22157.b7"},{"key":"ref52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1308\/003588405x51137"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.028"},{"key":"ref54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2004.07.007"},{"key":"ref55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2005.41057.x"},{"key":"ref56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-005-2820-z"},{"key":"ref57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/51075444"},{"key":"ref58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000107269"},{"key":"ref59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-006-0380-5"},{"key":"ref60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-2980.2008.00339.x"},{"key":"ref61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2493080389"},{"key":"ref62","unstructured":"Norero E, Norero B, Huete A, Pimentel F, Cruz F, Ibá\u00f1ez L, Martínez J, Jarufe N. [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones]. Rev Med Chil 2008;136:600-605."},{"key":"ref63","unstructured":"Srinivasa S, Sammour T, McEntee B, Davis N, Hill AG. Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis. Can J Surg 2010;53:403-407."},{"key":"ref64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1100\/2012\/731089"},{"key":"ref65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2011.02.036"},{"key":"ref66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7860\/jcdr\/2013\/6158.3365"},{"key":"ref67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.1998.00957.x"},{"key":"ref68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, Ernst RD, Black CT, Greger PH, Fischer RP, Mercer DW. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999;178:480-484.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(99)00224-X"},{"key":"ref69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Pelletier G. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999;44:118-122.","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.44.1.118"},{"key":"ref70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1129-1135.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(03)00177-X"},{"key":"ref71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001;323:157-162.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.323.7305.157"},{"key":"ref72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petitti DB. Approaches to heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2001;20:3625-3633.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1091"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Gastroenterology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.wjgnet.com\/1007-9327\/full\/v21\/i11\/3351.htm","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,3]],"date-time":"2019-10-03T11:39:36Z","timestamp":1570102776000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.wjgnet.com\/1007-9327\/full\/v21\/i11\/3351.htm"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,21]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,21]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v21.i11.3351","relation":{},"ISSN":["1007-9327"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1007-9327","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,21]]}}}