{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,27]],"date-time":"2026-10-27T14:45:58Z","timestamp":1793112358258,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,24]],"date-time":"2024-10-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1729728000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,24]],"date-time":"2024-10-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1729728000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psychon Bull Rev"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to changes in healthcare. Government and regulatory bodies have advocated the need for transparency in AI systems with recommendations to provide users with more details about AI accuracy and how AI systems work. However, increased transparency could lead to negative outcomes if humans become overreliant on the technology. This study investigated how changes in AI transparency affected human decision-making in a medical-screening visual search task. Transparency was manipulated by either giving or withholding knowledge about the accuracy of an \u2018AI system\u2019. We tested performance in seven simulated lab mammography tasks, in which observers searched for a cancer which could be correctly or incorrectly flagged by computer-aided detection (CAD) \u2018AI prompts\u2019. Across tasks, the CAD systems varied in accuracy. In the \u2018transparent\u2019 condition, participants were told the accuracy of the CAD system, in the \u2018not transparent\u2019 condition, they were not. The results showed that increasing CAD transparency impaired task performance, producing an increase in false alarms, decreased sensitivity, an increase in recall rate, and a decrease in positive predictive value. Along with increasing investment in AI, this research shows that it is important to investigate how transparency of AI systems affect human decision-making. Increased transparency may lead to overtrust in AI systems, which can impact clinical outcomes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-024-02601-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,24]],"date-time":"2024-10-24T16:04:33Z","timestamp":1729785873000},"page":"951-960","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Increasing transparency of computer-aided detection impairs decision-making in visual search"],"prefix":"10.3758","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Melina A.","family":"Kunar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Montana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Derrick G.","family":"Watson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"2601_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.07.019","volume":"17","author":"A Alexander","year":"2020","unstructured":"Alexander, A., Jiang, A., Ferreira, C., & Zurkiya, D. (2020). An intelligent future for medical imaging: A market outlook on artificial intelligence for medical imaging. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 17(1), 165\u2013170.","journal-title":"Journal of the American College of Radiology"},{"issue":"8","key":"2601_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2021.04.002","volume":"18","author":"B Allen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Allen, B., Agarwal, S., Coombs, L., Wald, C., & Dreyer, K. (2021). 2020 ACR Data Science Institute artificial intelligence survey. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 18(8), 1153\u20131159.","journal-title":"Journal of the American College of Radiology"},{"key":"2601_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0959-8049(00)00065-4","volume":"36","author":"AR Aro","year":"2000","unstructured":"Aro, A. R. (2000). False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress\u2014Breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. European Journal of Cancer, 36, 1089\u20131097.","journal-title":"European Journal of Cancer"},{"key":"2601_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/s12553-023-00738-2","volume":"13","author":"S Askin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Askin, S., Burkhalter, D., Calado, G., & El Dakrouni, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence applied to clinical trials: Opportunities and challenges. Health and Technology, 13, 203\u2013213.","journal-title":"Health and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2601_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-020-00324-0","volume":"3","author":"S Benjamens","year":"2020","unstructured":"Benjamens, S., Dhunnoo, P., & Mesk\u00f3, B. (2020). The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: An online database. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 118.","journal-title":"NPJ Digital Medicine"},{"key":"2601_CR6","unstructured":"Biran, O., & Cotton, C. (2017, August). Explanation and justification in machine learning: A survey. IJCAI-17 Workshop on Explainable AI (XAI), 8(1), 8\u201313."},{"issue":"CSCW1","key":"2601_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3449287","volume":"5","author":"Z Bu\u00e7inca","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bu\u00e7inca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). To trust or to think: Cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1\u201321.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction"},{"key":"2601_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bussone, A., Stumpf, S., & O\u2019Sullivan, D. (2015, October). The role of explanations on trust and reliance in clinical decision support systems. In\u00a02015 international conference on healthcare informatics\u00a0(pp. 160\u2013169). IEEE.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICHI.2015.26"},{"issue":"4","key":"2601_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1037\/xap0000277","volume":"26","author":"T Drew","year":"2020","unstructured":"Drew, T., Guthrie, J., & Reback, I. (2020). Worse in real life: An eye-tracking examination of the cost of CAD at low prevalence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26(4), 659\u2013670. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xap0000277","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied"},{"key":"2601_CR10","volume-title":"Signal detection theory and psychophysics","author":"DM Green","year":"1967","unstructured":"Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1967). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. John Wiley and Sons."},{"issue":"6","key":"2601_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3333","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00276-4","volume":"26","author":"H Felzmann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Felzmann, H., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., & Tam\u00f2-Larrieux, A. (2020). Towards transparency by design for artificial intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3333\u20133361.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"2601_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fenton, J. J., Taplin, S. H., Carney, P. A., Abraham, L., Sickles, E. A., D\u2019Orsi, C., . . . Elmore, J. G. (2007) Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 1399\u20131409.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa066099"},{"issue":"11","key":"2601_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2007.02006.x","volume":"18","author":"MS Fleck","year":"2007","unstructured":"Fleck, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2007). Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Psychological Science, 18(11), 943\u2013947.","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"key":"2601_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2203001282","volume":"220","author":"TW Freer","year":"2001","unstructured":"Freer, T. W., & Ulissey, M. J. (2001). Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology, 220, 781\u2013786.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2601_CR15","unstructured":"Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., & Kegelmeyer, P. (2001). The digital database for screening mammography, IWDM-2000. Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography\u00a0(pp. 212\u2013218). Medical Physics Publishing."},{"key":"2601_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacobs, M., Pradier, M. F., McCoy, T. H., Jr, Perlis, R. H., Doshi-Velez, F., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). How machine-learning recommendations influence clinician treatment selections: The example of antidepressant selection.\u00a0Translational Psychiatry,\u00a011(1), Article 108.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41398-021-01224-x"},{"key":"2601_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.7771\/1932-6246.1167","volume":"7","author":"AF Jarosz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2\u20139.","journal-title":"The Journal of Problem Solving"},{"key":"2601_CR18","unstructured":"JASP Team. (2021). JASP (Version 0.16) [Computer software]."},{"key":"2601_CR19","unstructured":"Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.) Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"11","key":"2601_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2020-107095","volume":"48","author":"CX Kerasidou","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kerasidou, C. X., Kerasidou, A., Buscher, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2022). Before and beyond trust: Reliance in medical AI. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(11), 852\u2013856.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"2601_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kingsman, N., Kazim, E., Chaudhry, A., Hilliard, A., Koshiyama, A., Polle, R., . . . Mohammed, U. (2022). Public sector AI transparency standard: UK Government seeks to lead by example.\u00a0Discover Artificial Intelligence,\u00a02(1), Article 2.","DOI":"10.1007\/s44163-022-00018-4"},{"key":"2601_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Konstantinidis, K. (2023). The shortage of radiographers: A global crisis in healthcare.\u00a0Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 55(4), Article 101333.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmir.2023.10.001"},{"issue":"1","key":"2601_CR23","first-page":"1","volume":"7","author":"MA Kunar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kunar, M. A. (2022). The optimal use of computer aided detection to find low prevalence cancers. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 1\u201318.","journal-title":"Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications"},{"key":"2601_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kunar, M. A., & Watson, D. G. (2023). Framing the fallibility of computer-aided detection aids cancer detection.\u00a0Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications,\u00a08(1), Article 30.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41235-023-00485-y"},{"key":"2601_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kunar, M. A., Watson, D. G., & Taylor-Phillips, S. (2021). Double reading reduces miss errors in low prevalence search.\u00a0Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,\u00a027(1), Article 84.","DOI":"10.1037\/xap0000335"},{"key":"2601_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kunar, M. A., Watson, D. G., Taylor-Phillips, S., & Wolska, J. (2017). Low prevalence search for cancers in mammograms: Evidence using laboratory experiments and computer aided detection.\u00a0Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,\u00a023(4), Article 369.","DOI":"10.1037\/xap0000132"},{"key":"2601_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lehman, C. D., Wellman, R. D., Buist, D. S., Kerlikowske, K., Tosteson, A. N., Miglioretti, D. L., & Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection.\u00a0JAMA Internal Medicine,\u00a0175(11), 1828\u20131837","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2015.5231"},{"key":"2601_CR28","unstructured":"Lekadir, K., Osuala, R., Gallin, C., Lazrak, N., Kushibar, K., Tsakou, G., . . . Mart\u00ed-Bonmat\u00ed, L. (2021). FUTURE-AI: Guiding principles and consensus recommendations for trustworthy artificial intelligence in medical imaging.\u00a0ArXiv Preprint. arXiv:2109.09658"},{"key":"2601_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.98.1.185","volume":"98","author":"NA Macmillan","year":"1985","unstructured":"Macmillan, N. A., & Kaplan, H. L. (1985). Detection theory analysis of group data: Estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 185\u2013199.","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"key":"2601_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McKinney, S. M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V., Godwin, J., Antropova, N., Ashrafian, H., . . . Shetty, S. (2020). International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature,577(7788).","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-019-1799-6"},{"key":"2601_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mello-Thoms, C., & Mello, C. A. (2023). Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in radiology.\u00a0The British Journal of Radiology,\u00a096(1150), Article 20221031.","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20221031"},{"key":"2601_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ng, A. Y., Glocker, B., Oberije, C., Fox, G., Sharma, N., James, J. J., . . . Kecskemethy, P. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence as supporting reader in breast screening: A novel workflow to preserve quality and reduce workload.\u00a0Journal of Breast Imaging,\u00a05(3), 267\u2013276.","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbad010"},{"issue":"4","key":"2601_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2015.06.003","volume":"21","author":"NM Norsuddin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Norsuddin, N. M., Reed, W., Mello-Thoms, C., & Lewis, S. J. (2015). Understanding recall rates in screening mammography: A conceptual framework review of the literature. Radiography, 21(4), 334\u2013341.","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"key":"2601_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patterson, F., & Kunar, M.A. (2024). The message matters: Changes to binary computer aided detection recommendations affect cancer detection in low prevalence search. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9, Article 59.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41235-024-00576-4"},{"key":"2601_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., H\u00f6chenberger, R., Sogo, H., . . . Lindel\u00f8v, J. (2019).\u00a0PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.\u00a0Behavior Research Methods. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-018-01193-y","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-018-01193-y"},{"issue":"4","key":"2601_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.19.22429","volume":"216","author":"GH Rauscher","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rauscher, G. H., Murphy, A. M., Qiu, Q., Dolecek, T. A., Tossas, K., Liu, Y., & Alsheik, N. H. (2021). The \u201csweet spot\u201d revisited: Optimal recall rates for cancer detection with 2D and 3D digital screening mammography in the Metro Chicago Breast Cancer Registry. American Journal of Roentgenology, 216(4), 894\u2013902.","journal-title":"American Journal of Roentgenology"},{"key":"2601_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1151150","DOI":"10.3389\/fcomp.2023.1151150","volume":"5","author":"N Scharowski","year":"2023","unstructured":"Scharowski, N., Perrig, S. A., Svab, M., Opwis, K., & Br\u00fchlmann, F. (2023). Exploring the effects of human-centered AI explanations on trust and reliance. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, 1151150.","journal-title":"Frontiers in Computer Science"},{"issue":"6","key":"2601_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1475","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.05.0940","volume":"187","author":"SH Taplin","year":"2006","unstructured":"Taplin, S. H., Rutter, C. M., & Lehman, C. D. (2006). Testing the effect of computer assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology, 187(6), 1475\u20131482.","journal-title":"American Journal of Roentgenology"},{"key":"2601_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taylor-Phillips, S., Jenkinson, D., Stinton, C., Kunar, M. A., Watson, D. G., Freeman, K., . . . Clarke, A. (2024). Fatigue and vigilance in medical experts detecting breast cancer.\u00a0Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,\u00a0121(11), Article e2309576121.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2309576121"},{"key":"2601_CR40","unstructured":"UK Department for Science, Innovation & Technology. (2023). A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation.\u00a0GOV.UK. Retrieved from\u00a0https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/ai-regulation-a-pro-innovation-approach\/white-paper"},{"key":"2601_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, A. J., Love, J., . . . Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 35\u201357.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-017-1343-3"},{"key":"2601_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., . . . Morey, R. D. (2018b). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 58\u201376.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-017-1323-7"},{"key":"2601_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Van Wert, M. J., Kenner, N. M., Place, S. S., & Kibbi, N. (2007). Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 623\u2013638. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0096-3445.136.4.623","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-3445.136.4.623"},{"key":"2601_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cub.2009.11.066","volume":"20","author":"JM Wolfe","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wolfe, J. M., & Van Wert, M. J. (2010). Varying target prevalence reveals two, dissociable decision criteria in visual search. Current Biology, 20, 121\u2013124.","journal-title":"Current Biology"},{"key":"2601_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/S1076-6332(03)00677-9","volume":"11","author":"B Zheng","year":"2004","unstructured":"Zheng, B., Richard, G. S., Sara, G., Christiane, M. H., Ratan, S., Luisa, W., & David, G. (2004). Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments1. Academic Radiology, 11, 398\u2013406.","journal-title":"Academic Radiology"}],"container-title":["Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.3758\/s13423-024-02601-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.3758\/s13423-024-02601-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.3758\/s13423-024-02601-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,15]],"date-time":"2025-04-15T16:03:52Z","timestamp":1744733032000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.3758\/s13423-024-02601-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,24]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]}},"alternative-id":["2601"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-024-02601-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1069-9384","1531-5320"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1069-9384","type":"print"},{"value":"1531-5320","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 October 2024","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 October 2024","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest\/competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest\/Competing interests"}},{"value":"Ethical approval for all studies was granted by the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee at the University of Warwick.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"All participants provided informed consent prior to completing the experiment.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The data and materials for all experiments are available online\u00a0(). None of the experiments were preregistered.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Open practices statement"}}]}}