{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,4]],"date-time":"2026-11-04T21:05:17Z","timestamp":1793826317393,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,7]],"date-time":"2026-01-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767744000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":6,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psychon Bull Rev"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Repetition increases the perceived truth of information. This illusory truth effect is a well-documented and robust phenomenon. Although research has primarily focused on trivia statements, the effects of repetition on belief have also been identified for consequential statements such as fake news headlines. Moreover, research reveals repetition increases accuracy ratings for conspiracy statements. However, in past work, the illusory truth effect was smaller for conspiracy statements than trivia statements. This result raises the intriguing possibility that there is something unique about conspiracy statements relative to trivia statements that makes them more resistant to the effects of repetition. However, this difference in the illusory truth effect between conspiracy and trivia statements may be due to differences in baseline plausibility rather than anything specific about conspiracy statements. Overall, the conspiracy statements were seen as less plausible than the trivia statements (both true and false trivia statements) in the prior experiment. In this registered report, we examined the illusory truth effect for conspiracy and trivia statements using the same procedure as in previous research, but we matched the statements on baseline plausibility. In line with our hypothesis, the effect of repetition on perceived truth was similar for conspiracy and trivia statements when they were equally implausible (or plausible). Results from this study replicate the generality of the illusory truth effect to statements that can cause harm and suggest that the psychological effect of repetition on truth ratings is equivalent for equally implausible (or plausible) conspiracy and trivia statements.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-025-02836-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,7]],"date-time":"2026-01-07T16:36:20Z","timestamp":1767803780000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Does repetition increase perceived truth equally for conspiracy and trivia statements? A registered replication report"],"prefix":"10.3758","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Shauna M.","family":"Bowes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisa K.","family":"Fazio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"2836_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v067.i01","volume":"67","author":"D Bates","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bates, D., M\u00e4chler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1\u201348.","journal-title":"Journal of Statistical Software"},{"key":"2836_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2397","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-023-02276-4","volume":"30","author":"J B\u00e9na","year":"2023","unstructured":"B\u00e9na, J., Rihet, M., Carreras, O., & Terrier, P. (2023). Repetition could increase the perceived truth of conspiracy theories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30, 2397\u20132406.","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"key":"2836_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 279.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00279"},{"key":"2836_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1037\/pag0000156","volume":"32","author":"NM Brashier","year":"2017","unstructured":"Brashier, N. M., Umanath, S., Cabeza, R., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency. Psychology and Aging, 32, 331\u2013337.","journal-title":"Psychology and Aging"},{"key":"2836_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00225","volume":"4","author":"M Bruder","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1\u201315.","journal-title":"Frontiers in Psychology"},{"key":"2836_CR6","volume-title":"12 million Americans believe lizard people run our country","author":"P Bump","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bump, P. (2013). 12 million Americans believe lizard people run our country. The Atlantic. https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/national\/archive\/2013\/04\/12-million-americans-believe-lizard-people-run-our-country\/316706\/"},{"key":"2836_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clifford, S., & Sullivan, B. W. (2023). Do survey questions spread conspiracy beliefs?. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10(2), 231\u2013241.","DOI":"10.1017\/XPS.2023.1"},{"key":"2836_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167219853844","volume":"46","author":"J De Keersmaecker","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Keersmaecker, J., Dunning, D., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G., Sanchez, C., Unkelbach, C., & Roets, A. (2020). Investigating the robustness of the illusory truth effect across individual differences in cognitive ability, need for cognitive closure, and cognitive style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 204\u2013215.","journal-title":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"},{"key":"2836_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1177\/1088868309352251","volume":"14","author":"A Dech\u00eane","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dech\u00eane, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wanke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238\u2013257.","journal-title":"Personality and Social Psychology Review"},{"key":"2836_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797619887896","volume":"31","author":"DA Effron","year":"2020","unstructured":"Effron, D. A., & Raj, M. (2020). Misinformation and morality: Encountering fake-news headlines makes them seem less unethical to publish and share. Psychological Science, 31, 75\u201387.","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"key":"2836_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1177\/1368430220960805","volume":"24","author":"AM Enders","year":"2021","unstructured":"Enders, A. M., & Uscinski, J. E. (2021). Are misinformation, antiscientific claims, and conspiracy theories for political extremists? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24, 583\u2013605.","journal-title":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations"},{"key":"2836_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.5964\/jspp.5649","volume":"9","author":"AM Enders","year":"2021","unstructured":"Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C. A., Seelig, M. I., Wuchty, S., Murthi, M. N., Premaratne, Kamal, & Funchion, J. R. (2021). Do conspiracy beliefs form a belief system? Examining the structure and organization of conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9, 255\u2013271.","journal-title":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology"},{"key":"2836_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.3758\/BRM.41.4.1149","volume":"41","author":"F Faul","year":"2009","unstructured":"Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149\u20131160.","journal-title":"Behavior Research Methods"},{"key":"2836_CR14","first-page":"1","volume":"6","author":"LK Fazio","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fazio, L. K. (2020). Repetition increases perceived truth even for known falsehoods. Collabra: Psychology, 6, 1\u20137.","journal-title":"Collabra: Psychology"},{"key":"2836_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1150","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797620939534","volume":"31","author":"LK Fazio","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fazio, L. K., & Sherry, C. L. (2020). The effect of repetition on truth judgments across development. Psychological Science, 31, 1150\u20131160.","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"key":"2836_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000098","volume":"144","author":"LK Fazio","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 993\u20131002.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"key":"2836_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1705","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-019-01651-4","volume":"26","author":"LK Fazio","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fazio, L. K., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1705\u20131710.","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"key":"2836_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.2495","volume":"48","author":"CM Federico","year":"2018","unstructured":"Federico, C. M., Williams, A. L., & Vitriol, J. A. (2018). The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 927\u2013938.","journal-title":"European Journal of Social Psychology"},{"key":"2836_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1257\/089533005775196732","volume":"19","author":"S Frederick","year":"2005","unstructured":"Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25\u201342.","journal-title":"Journal of Economic Perspectives"},{"key":"2836_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.5334\/joc.161","volume":"4","author":"EL Henderson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Henderson, E. L., Simons, D. J., & Barr, D. J. (2021). The trajectory of truth: A longitudinal study of the illusory truth effect. Journal of Cognition, 4, 1\u201323.","journal-title":"Journal of Cognition"},{"key":"2836_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-021-01995-w","author":"EL Henderson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Henderson, E. L., Westwood, S. J., & Simons, D. J. (2022). A reproducible systematic map of research on the illusory truth effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-021-01995-w","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"key":"2836_CR22","unstructured":"JASP Team. (2023). JASP (Version 0.18.2) [Computer software].\u00a0https:\/\/jasp-stats.org"},{"key":"2836_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1038\/s41593-020-0660-4","volume":"23","author":"C Keysers","year":"2020","unstructured":"Keysers, C., Gazzola, V., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nature Neuroscience, 23, 788\u2013799.","journal-title":"Nature Neuroscience"},{"key":"2836_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105052","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2022.105052","volume":"223","author":"D Lacassagne","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lacassagne, D., B\u00e9na, J., & Corneille, O. (2022). Is Earth a perfect square? Repetition increases the perceived truth of highly implausible statements. Cognition, 223, 105052. Advanced online publication.","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"2836_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2515245920951503","volume":"4","author":"D Lakens","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2021). Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4, 1\u201314.","journal-title":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science"},{"key":"2836_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meyer, A., Attali, Y., Bar-Hillel, M., Frederick, S., & Kahneman, D. (2024). Cognitive reflection is a distinct and measurable trait. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(49), e2409191121.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2409191121"},{"key":"2836_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1111\/ajps.12234","volume":"60","author":"JM Miller","year":"2016","unstructured":"Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60, 824\u2013844.","journal-title":"American Journal of Political Science"},{"key":"2836_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"952","DOI":"10.1111\/ajps.12084","volume":"58","author":"JE Oliver","year":"2014","unstructured":"Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 952\u2013966.","journal-title":"American Journal of Political Science"},{"key":"2836_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1865","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000465","volume":"147","author":"G Pennycook","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1865\u20131880.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"issue":"2","key":"2836_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1037\/mac0000166","volume":"14","author":"RM Pillai","year":"2024","unstructured":"Pillai, R. M., & Fazio, L. K. (2024). Repeated by many versus repeated by one: Examining the role of social consensus in the relationship between repetition and belief. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14(2), 154\u2013166.","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition"},{"key":"2836_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1177\/09567976231180578","volume":"34","author":"RM Pillai","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pillai, R. M., Fazio, L. K., & Effron, D. A. (2023). Repeatedly encountered descriptions of wrongdoing seem more true but less unethical: Evidence in a naturalistic setting. Psychological Science, 34, 863\u2013874.","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"key":"2836_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pvr.2016.09.001","volume":"2","author":"GK Shapiro","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shapiro, G. K., Holding, A., Perez, S., Amsel, R., & Rosberger, Z. (2016). Validation of the vaccine conspiracy beliefs scale. Papillomavirus Research, 2, 167\u2013172.","journal-title":"Papillomavirus Research"},{"key":"2836_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x","volume":"102","author":"V Swami","year":"2011","unstructured":"Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443\u2013463.","journal-title":"British Journal of Psychology"},{"key":"2836_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2023.101736","volume":"56","author":"J Udry","year":"2023","unstructured":"Udry, J., & Barber, S. J. (2023). The illusory truth effect: A review of how repetition increases belief in misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 56, Article 101736.","journal-title":"Current Opinion in Psychology"},{"key":"2836_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721419827854","volume":"28","author":"C Unkelbach","year":"2019","unstructured":"Unkelbach, C., Koch, A., Silva, R. R., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2019). Truth by repetition: Explanations and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 247\u2013253.","journal-title":"Current Directions in Psychological Science"},{"key":"2836_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Uscinski, J. E. (2019). What is a conspiracy theory? In J. E. Uscinski (Ed.), Conspiracy theories & the people who believe them (pp. 47\u201352). Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780190844073.001.0001"},{"key":"2836_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Uscinski, J., Enders, A., Diekman, A., Funchion, J., Klofstad, C., Kuebler, S., ...., & Wuchty, S. (2022). The psychological and political correlates of conspiracy theory beliefs.\u00a0Scientific Reports,\u00a012, 1\u201312.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-25617-0"},{"key":"2836_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.2530","volume":"48","author":"JW van Prooijen","year":"2018","unstructured":"van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 897\u2013908.","journal-title":"European Journal of Social Psychology"},{"key":"2836_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1177\/09567976231158570","volume":"34","author":"JW van Prooijen","year":"2023","unstructured":"van Prooijen, J. W., Wahring, I., Mausolf, L., Mulas, N., & Shwan, S. (2023). Just dead, not alive: Reconsidering belief in contradictory conspiracy theories. Psychological Science, 34, 670\u2013682.","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"key":"2836_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105421","volume":"236","author":"V Vellani","year":"2023","unstructured":"Vellani, V., Zheng, S., Ercelik, D., & Sharot, T. (2023). The illusory truth effect leads to the spread of misinformation. Cognition, 236, 1\u20137.","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"2836_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1111\/bjso.12518","volume":"61","author":"MN Williams","year":"2022","unstructured":"Williams, M. N., Marques, M. D., Hill, S. R., Kerr, J. R., & Ling, M. (2022). Why are beliefs in different conspiracy theories positively correlated across individuals? Testing monological network versus unidimensional factor model explanations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61, 1011\u20131031.","journal-title":"British Journal of Social Psychology"}],"container-title":["Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.3758\/s13423-025-02836-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.3758\/s13423-025-02836-w","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.3758\/s13423-025-02836-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,18]],"date-time":"2026-02-18T18:30:51Z","timestamp":1771439451000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.3758\/s13423-025-02836-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["2836"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-025-02836-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1069-9384","1531-5320"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1069-9384","type":"print"},{"value":"1531-5320","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 August 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 December 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest\/competing interests"}},{"value":"This study has been approved by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board. The full ethics approval information will be provided after peer review to ensure the submission is blind.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"All participants provided consent to participate in the pretest and also provided consent to participate in the main study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"All authors consent to the submission of this manuscript to\n                      Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}],"article-number":"39"}}