{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T19:49:32Z","timestamp":1792784972984,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":71,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790121600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790121600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001659","name":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["GRK 2277 \u2013 Projektnummer 310365261"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["GRK 2277 \u2013 Projektnummer 310365261"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001659","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008316","name":"Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg Stiftung","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Postdoctoral fellowship"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Postdoctoral fellowship"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008316","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psychon Bull Rev"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The truth effect, the tendency to judge repeated information as more truthful, is a robust cognitive phenomenon. Yet efforts to study individual differences in this effect have returned inconsistent results. We argue that these inconsistencies largely reflect methodological limitations. Specifically, since correlations are attenuated by low reliability, conflicting findings likely stem from inconsistent measurement reliability across studies. In this structured, large-scale analysis of truth-effect datasets, we assess the psychometric properties of truth-effect paradigms. Rather than focusing solely on reliability \u2013 which depends on the number of replicate trials \u2013 we use signal-to-noise ratios, a recently proposed metric that captures psychometric goodness independent of trial size. Together, signal-to-noise ratios and trial size determine reliability, and both vary considerably across studies. Because increasing trial size alone is not always sufficient to ensure adequate reliability, we identify design characteristics that influence psychometric goodness in truth-effect experiments, such as stimulus material, initial task, sample composition, and study setting. Based on these findings, we offer practical recommendations for designing truth-effect experiments that afford the necessary psychometric goodness to measure individual differences. We show that, when psychometric goodness is high, localizing individual differences and their correlations with other psychological constructs is feasible with a manageable number of trials. These findings provide a basis for future research on individual differences in the truth effect and further underscore the importance of psychometric considerations in cognitive experiments.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-026-02975-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T18:26:32Z","timestamp":1790187992000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A psychometrics of individual differences in the truth effect"],"prefix":"10.3758","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-2193-1692","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Selina","family":"Zajdler","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6531-2265","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Martin","family":"Schnuerch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"2975_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1031(91)90026-3","volume":"27","author":"HR Arkes","year":"1991","unstructured":"Arkes, H. R., Boehm, L. E., & Xu, G. (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(6), 576\u2013605. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-1031(91)90026-3","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2975_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167294203006","volume":"20","author":"LE Boehm","year":"1994","unstructured":"Boehm, L. E. (1994). The validity effect: A search for mediating variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3), 285\u2013293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167294203006","journal-title":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"},{"key":"2975_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Article 104054","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2019.104054","volume":"194","author":"NM Brashier","year":"2020","unstructured":"Brashier, N. M., Eliseev, E. D., & Marsh, E. J. (2020). An initial accuracy focus prevents illusory truth. Cognition, 194, Article 104054. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2019.104054","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"issue":"4","key":"2975_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1037\/pag0000156","volume":"32","author":"NM Brashier","year":"2017","unstructured":"Brashier, N. M., Umanath, S., Cabeza, R., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency. Psychology and Aging, 32(4), 331\u2013337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pag0000156","journal-title":"Psychology and Aging"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v080.i01","volume":"80","author":"P-C B\u00fcrkner","year":"2017","unstructured":"B\u00fcrkner, P.-C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18637\/jss.v080.i01","journal-title":"Journal of Statistical Software"},{"key":"2975_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Article 103923","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2025.103923","volume":"135","author":"F Calio","year":"2025","unstructured":"Calio, F., Nadarevic, L., & Musch, J. (2025). Assessing the truth effect\u2019s reliability and test\u2013retest stability. Consciousness and Cognition, 135, Article 103923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2025.103923","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"key":"2975_CR7","unstructured":"Cubeddu, V., B\u00e9na, J., & Corneille, O. (2024). Are there stable individual qualitative differences in the truth effect? Unpublished raw data. Retrieved from https:\/\/osf.io\/3ax97"},{"issue":"2","key":"2975_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167219853844","volume":"46","author":"J De Keersmaecker","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Keersmaecker, J., Dunning, D., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G., Sanchez, C., Unkelbach, C., & Roets, A. (2020). Investigating the robustness of the illusory truth effect across individual differences in cognitive ability, need for cognitive closure, and cognitive style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 204\u2013215. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167219853844","journal-title":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"},{"key":"2975_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"De Keersmaecker, J., Wiernik, B. M., Roets, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2026). Truth by repetition reliably differs between people over time. PsyArXiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/aeukr_v2","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/aeukr_v2"},{"issue":"2","key":"2975_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1177\/1088868309352251","volume":"14","author":"A Dech\u00eane","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dech\u00eane, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & W\u00e4nke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 238\u2013257. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1088868309352251","journal-title":"Personality and Social Psychology Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1080\/15534510.2015.1137224","volume":"11","author":"N DiFonzo","year":"2016","unstructured":"DiFonzo, N., Beckstead, J. W., Stupak, N., & Walders, K. (2016). Validity judgments of rumors heard multiple times: The shape of the truth effect. Social Influence, 11(1), 22\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15534510.2015.1137224","journal-title":"Social Influence"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1038\/s44159-021-00006-y","volume":"1","author":"UKH Ecker","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s44159-021-00006-y","journal-title":"Nature Reviews Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797619887896","volume":"31","author":"DA Effron","year":"2020","unstructured":"Effron, D. A., & Raj, M. (2020). Misinformation and morality: Encountering fake-news headlines makes them seem less unethical to publish and share. Psychological Science, 31(1), 75\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797619887896","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.4316\/JACSM.202201002","volume":"16","author":"C Fanny","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fanny, C., & Istiono, W. (2022). Analysis timeline user content on Instagram using simple additive weighting algorithm. Journal of Applied Computer Science & Mathematics, 16(1), 14\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4316\/JACSM.202201002","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Computer Science & Mathematics"},{"issue":"5","key":"2975_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000098","volume":"144","author":"LK Fazio","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993\u20131002. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xge0000098","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"issue":"10","key":"2975_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2604","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0001211","volume":"151","author":"LK Fazio","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fazio, L. K., Pillai, R. M., & Patel, D. (2022). The effects of repetition on belief in naturalistic settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(10), 2604\u20132613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xge0001211","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"key":"2975_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fazio, L. K., & Sherry, C. L. (2020). The effect of repetition on truth judgments across development. Psychological Science,\u00a031(9), 1150\u20131160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797620939534","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797620939534"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1521\/soco.2016.34.1.40","volume":"34","author":"T Garcia-Marques","year":"2016","unstructured":"Garcia-Marques, T., Silva, R. R., & Mello, J. (2016). Judging the truth-value of a statement in and out of a deep processing context. Social Cognition, 34(1), 40\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1521\/soco.2016.34.1.40","journal-title":"Social Cognition"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1177\/00131644231164316","volume":"84","author":"MA Garc\u00eda-P\u00e9rez","year":"2023","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda-P\u00e9rez, M. A. (2023). Are the steps on Likert scales equidistant? Responses on visual analog scales allow estimating their distances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 84(1), 91\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00131644231164316","journal-title":"Educational and Psychological Measurement"},{"issue":"3","key":"2975_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-015-0968-3","volume":"23","author":"SB Green","year":"2016","unstructured":"Green, S. B., Yang, Y., Alt, M., Brinkley, S., Gray, S., Hogan, T., & Cowan, N. (2016). Use of internal consistency coefficients for estimating reliability of experimental task scores. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 750\u2013763. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-015-0968-3","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"key":"2975_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Haaf, J. M., Hoffstadt, M., & Lesche, S. (2025). Attentional control data collection: A resource for efficient data reuse. Behavior Research Methods, 57(8), Article 208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-025-02717-z","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-025-02717-z"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5371(77)80012-1","volume":"16","author":"L Hasher","year":"1977","unstructured":"Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(1), 107\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-5371(77)80012-1","journal-title":"Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Article 38","DOI":"10.1186\/s41235-021-00301-5","volume":"6","author":"A Hassan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hassan, A., & Barber, S. J. (2021). The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), Article 38. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41235-021-00301-5","journal-title":"Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications"},{"issue":"3","key":"2975_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-024-02596-z","volume":"32","author":"A Hatzidaki","year":"2025","unstructured":"Hatzidaki, A., Santesteban, M., & Navarrete, E. (2025). Illusory truth effect across languages and scripts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 32(3), 1231\u20131239. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-024-02596-z","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327663JCP1101_1","volume":"11","author":"SA Hawkins","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hawkins, S. A., Hoch, S. J., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2001). Low-Involvement Learning: Repetition and Coherence in Familiarity and Belief. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/S15327663JCP1101_1","journal-title":"Journal of Consumer Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Article 29","DOI":"10.5334\/joc.161","volume":"4","author":"EL Henderson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Henderson, E. L., Simons, D. J., & Barr, D. J. (2021). The trajectory of truth: A longitudinal study of the illusory truth effect. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), Article 29. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/joc.161","journal-title":"Journal of Cognition"},{"issue":"3","key":"2975_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-021-01995-w","volume":"29","author":"EL Henderson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Henderson, E. L., Westwood, S. J., & Simons, D. J. (2022). A reproducible systematic map of research on the illusory truth effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 1065\u20131088. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-021-01995-w","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"2975_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jarmac.2020.08.010","volume":"9","author":"M Jalbert","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jalbert, M., Schwarz, N., & Newman, E. (2020). Only half of what i\u2019ll tell you is true: Expecting to encounter falsehoods reduces illusory truth. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 602\u2013613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jarmac.2020.08.010","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition"},{"key":"2975_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2173","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-016-0850-x","volume":"49","author":"T Kuhlmann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kuhlmann, T., Dantlgraber, M., & Reips, U. D. (2017). Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert-type scales in internet-based personality questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 2173\u20132181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-016-0850-x","journal-title":"Behavior Research Methods"},{"key":"2975_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2022.105052","volume":"223","author":"D Lacassagne","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lacassagne, D., B\u00e9na, J., & Corneille, O. (2022). Is Earth a perfect square? Repetition increases the perceived truth of highly implausible statements. Cognition, 223, Article 105052. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2022.105052","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"2975_CR31","unstructured":"Le Bon, G. (1895). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. [Released 2003]. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing. Retrieved from https:\/\/coronacircus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Gustave-Le-Bon-TheCrowd_-A-Study-of-the-Popular-Mind-1982.pdf"},{"key":"2975_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lin, H., Savio, M. T., Huang, X., Steiger, M., Guevara, R. L., Szostak, D.,... Rand, D. G. (2024). Accuracy prompts protect professional content moderators from the illusory truth effect. PNAS Nexus, 3(11), Article 481. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/pnasnexus\/pgae481","DOI":"10.1093\/pnasnexus\/pgae481"},{"key":"2975_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lorenzoni, A., Faccio, R., & Navarrete, E. (2024). Does foreign-accented speech affect credibility? Evidence from the illusory-truth paradigm. Journal of Cognition,7(1), Article 26. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/joc.353","DOI":"10.5334\/joc.353"},{"key":"2975_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Murray, S., Stanley, M., McPhetres, J., Pennycook, G., & Seli, P. (2020). \"I\u2019ve said it before and I will say it again\": Repeating statements made by Donald Trump increases perceived truthfulness for individuals across the political spectrum. PsyArXiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/9evzc","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/9evzc"},{"key":"2975_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nadarevic, L. (2007). A failed replication of the truth effect. Unpublished raw data. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/FW2QE","DOI":"10.17605\/OSF.IO\/FW2QE"},{"issue":"4","key":"2975_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-016-0777-y","volume":"81","author":"L Nadarevic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nadarevic, L., & A\u00dffalg, A. (2017). Unveiling the truth: Warnings reduce the repetition-based truth effect. Psychological Research, 81(4), 814\u2013826. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-016-0777-y","journal-title":"Psychological Research"},{"key":"2975_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2013.12.002","volume":"23","author":"L Nadarevic","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2014). Initial judgment task and delay of the final validity-rating task moderate the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 23, 74\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2013.12.002","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"11","key":"2975_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1778","DOI":"10.1037\/xlm0001460","volume":"51","author":"L Nadarevic","year":"2025","unstructured":"Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2025). On the relationship between recognition judgments and truth judgments: Memory states moderate the recognition-based truth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 51(11), 1778\u20131795. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xlm0001460","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition"},{"key":"2975_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nadarevic, L., Meckler, D., & Schmidt, A. (2012). An investigation of the truth effect and different personality traits. Unpublished raw data. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/6wv4z","DOI":"10.17605\/OSF.IO\/6wv4z"},{"key":"2975_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2018.08.019","volume":"191","author":"L Nadarevic","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nadarevic, L., Plier, S., Thielmann, I., & Daranc\u00f3, S. (2018). Foreign language reduces the longevity of the repetition-based truth effect. Acta Psychologica, 191, 149\u2013159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.actpsy.2018.08.019","journal-title":"Acta Psychologica"},{"key":"2975_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nadarevic, L., & Rinnewitz, L. (2011). Judgment mode instructions do not moderate the truth effect. Unpublished raw data. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/3uaj7","DOI":"10.17605\/OSF.IO\/3uaj7"},{"key":"2975_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2019.102866","volume":"78","author":"EJ Newman","year":"2020","unstructured":"Newman, E. J., Jalbert, M. C., Schwarz, N., & Ly, D. P. (2020). Truthiness, the illusory truth effect, and the role of need for cognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 78, Article 102866. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2019.102866","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"key":"2975_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Orchinik, R., Rand, D. G., & Bhui, R. (2025). The not so illusory truth effect: A rational foundation for repetition effects. PsyArXiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/qvwdy_v3","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/qvwdy_v3"},{"issue":"2","key":"2975_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1080\/138255890968691","volume":"13","author":"CM Parks","year":"2006","unstructured":"Parks, C. M., & Toth, J. P. (2006). Fluency, familiarity, aging, and the illusion of truth. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13(2), 225\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/138255890968691","journal-title":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition"},{"issue":"12","key":"2975_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1865","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000465","volume":"147","author":"G Pennycook","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865\u20131880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xge0000465","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"issue":"5","key":"2975_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2013.08.010","volume":"67","author":"RA Peterson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1035\u20131041. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbusres.2013.08.010","journal-title":"Journal of Business Research"},{"issue":"6","key":"2975_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Article e1573","DOI":"10.1002\/wcs.1573","volume":"12","author":"RM Pillai","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pillai, R. M., & Fazio, L. K. (2021). The effects of repeating false and misleading information on belief. WIREs Cognitive Science, 12(6), Article e1573. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/wcs.1573","journal-title":"WIREs Cognitive Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"2975_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1037\/mac0000166","volume":"14","author":"RM Pillai","year":"2025","unstructured":"Pillai, R. M., & Fazio, L. K. (2025). Repeated by many versus repeated by one: Examining the role of social consensus in the relationship between repetition and belief. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14(2), 154\u2013166. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/mac0000166","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition"},{"key":"2975_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pillai, R. M., Fazio, L. K., & Effron, D. A. (2023). Repeatedly encountered descriptions of wrongdoing seem more true but less unethical: Evidence in a naturalistic setting. Psychological Science,34(8), 863\u2013874. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09567976231180578","DOI":"10.1177\/09567976231180578"},{"key":"2975_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.32614\/R.manuals","author":"R Core Team","year":"2025","unstructured":"R Core Team. (2025). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32614\/R.manuals","journal-title":"R Foundation for Statistical Computing"},{"key":"2975_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Riesthuis, P., & Woods, J. (2024). \u201cThat\u2019s just like, your opinion, man\u201d: The illusory truth effect on opinions. Psychological Research,88(1), 284\u2013306. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-023-01845-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-023-01845-5"},{"issue":"2","key":"2975_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-018-1558-y","volume":"26","author":"JN Rouder","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 452\u2013467. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-018-1558-y","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"issue":"6","key":"2975_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-023-02293-3","volume":"30","author":"JN Rouder","year":"2023","unstructured":"Rouder, J. N., Kumar, A., & Haaf, J. M. (2023). Why many studies of individual differences with inhibition tasks may not localize correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(6), 2049\u20132066. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-023-02293-3","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"issue":"2","key":"2975_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1177\/09637214231220923","volume":"33","author":"JN Rouder","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rouder, J. N., & Mehrvarz, M. (2024). Hierarchical-model insights for planning and interpreting individual-difference studies of cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33(2), 128\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09637214231220923","journal-title":"Current Directions in Psychological Science"},{"key":"2975_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rouder, J. N., Mehrvarz, M., & Schnuerch, M. (2026). The role of reliability in experiments. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, Article bmsp.70042. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bmsp.70042","DOI":"10.1111\/bmsp.70042"},{"issue":"3","key":"2975_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-020-01814-8","volume":"28","author":"M Schnuerch","year":"2021","unstructured":"Schnuerch, M., Nadarevic, L., & Rouder, J. N. (2021). The truth revisited: Bayesian analysis of individual differences in the truth effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 750\u2013765. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-020-01814-8","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"key":"2975_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schnuerch, M., & Rouder, J. N. (2026). Assessing qualitative individual differences with Bayesian hierarchical latent-mixture models. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/met0000840","DOI":"10.1037\/met0000840"},{"key":"2975_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2017.02.016","volume":"51","author":"RR Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Silva, R. R., Garcia-Marques, T., & Reber, R. (2017). The informative value of type of repetition: Perceptual and conceptual fluency influences on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 53\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2017.02.016","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"4","key":"2975_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1037\/pas0000648","volume":"31","author":"LJ Simms","year":"2019","unstructured":"Simms, L. J., Zelazny, K., Williams, T. F., & Bernstein, L. (2019). Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 557\u2013566. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pas0000648","journal-title":"Psychological Assessment"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.2307\/1412159","volume":"15","author":"C Spearman","year":"1904","unstructured":"Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1412159","journal-title":"The American Journal of Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2975_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-020-01459-1","volume":"86","author":"A Stump","year":"2022","unstructured":"Stump, A., Rummel, J., & Voss, A. (2022). Is it all about the feeling? Affective and (meta-)cognitive mechanisms underlying the truth effect. Psychological Research, 86(1), 12\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-020-01459-1","journal-title":"Psychological Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"2975_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-024-01956-7","volume":"88","author":"A Stump","year":"2024","unstructured":"Stump, A., Voss, A., & Rummel, J. (2024). The illusory certainty: Information repetition and impressions of truth enhance subjective confidence in validity judgments independently of the factual truth. Psychological Research, 88(4), 1288\u20131297. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-024-01956-7","journal-title":"Psychological Research"},{"key":"2975_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105607","volume":"241","author":"J Udry","year":"2023","unstructured":"Udry, J., & Barber, S. J. (2023). The illusory truth effect requires semantic coherence across repetitions. Cognition, 241, Article 105607. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105607","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"2975_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2022.105157","volume":"225","author":"J Udry","year":"2022","unstructured":"Udry, J., White, S. K., & Barber, S. J. (2022). The effects of repetition spacing on the illusory truth effect. Cognition, 225, Article 105157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2022.105157","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"issue":"2","key":"2975_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1037\/h0076759","volume":"30","author":"BJ Underwood","year":"1975","unstructured":"Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30(2), 128\u2013134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0076759","journal-title":"American Psychologist"},{"key":"2975_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2016.12.016","volume":"160","author":"C Unkelbach","year":"2017","unstructured":"Unkelbach, C., & Rom, S. C. (2017). A referential theory of the repetition-induced truth effect. Cognition, 160, 110\u2013126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2016.12.016","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"issue":"2","key":"2975_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jarmac.2021.02.001","volume":"10","author":"C Unkelbach","year":"2021","unstructured":"Unkelbach, C., & Speckmann, F. (2021). Mere repetition increases belief in factually true COVID-19-related information. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 241\u2013247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jarmac.2021.02.001","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition"},{"key":"2975_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105421","volume":"236","author":"V Vellani","year":"2023","unstructured":"Vellani, V., Zheng, S., Ercelik, D., & Sharot, T. (2023). The illusory truth effect leads to the spread of misinformation. Cognition, 236, Article 105421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105421","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"issue":"8","key":"2975_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000731","volume":"149","author":"T Vogel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Vogel, T., Silva, R. R., Thomas, A., & W\u00e4nke, M. (2020). Truth is in the mind, but beauty is in the eye: Fluency effects are moderated by a match between fluency source and judgment dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(8), 1587\u20131596. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xge0000731","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"issue":"5","key":"2975_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1177\/08944393211006847","volume":"40","author":"A Weigold","year":"2022","unstructured":"Weigold, A., & Weigold, I. K. (2022). Traditional and modern convenience samples: An investigation of college student, mechanical turk, and mechanical turk college student samples. Social Science Computer Review, 40(5), 1302\u20131322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08944393211006847","journal-title":"Social Science Computer Review"},{"key":"2975_CR71","unstructured":"Zajdler, S. (2021). Explaining individual differences in the truth effect. [Bachelor thesis]. University of Mannheim"}],"container-title":["Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.3758\/s13423-026-02975-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.3758\/s13423-026-02975-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.3758\/s13423-026-02975-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T19:32:36Z","timestamp":1792783956000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.3758\/s13423-026-02975-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"references-count":71,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["2975"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-026-02975-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1069-9384","1531-5320"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1069-9384","type":"print"},{"value":"1531-5320","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 July 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflicts of Interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent to Participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for Publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"244"}}