{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,26]],"date-time":"2025-05-26T21:27:12Z","timestamp":1748294832595,"version":"3.37.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Academy of Audiology","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["j am acad audiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Currently published hearing aid fitting protocols recommend speech-in-noise testing and loudness measures, but it remains unclear how these measures affect hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction. This study compared two protocols in their effects on benefit and satisfaction. Protocol\n A included an electroacoustic analysis, real-ear measures, and hearing aid adjustments based on users' comments. Protocol B included all of Protocol A and a speech-in-noise test, loudness discomfort levels, and aided loudness. Thirty-two participants completed the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing\n Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) at 45 days and three months post\u2013initial fitting. Fewer hearing aid adjustments were made to the hearing aids for participants fitted with Protocol B than participants fitted with Protocol A, but final gains\n were similar for both groups. Although similar APHAB scores were obtained for both protocols, SADL scores decreased between 45 days and three months for Protocol A. Los protocoles de amplificaci\u00f3n de auxiliares auditivo actualmente publicados recomiendan pruebas de lenguaje en ruido\n y mediciones de apreciaci\u00f3n subjetiva de la intensidad (sonoridad), pero no est\u00e1 claro c\u00f3mo estas mediciones afectan el beneficio de un auxiliar auditivo y la satisfacci\u00f3n del usuario. El estudio compar\u00f3 dos protocolos en cuanto a sus efectos sobre beneficio\n y satisfacci\u00f3n. El Protocolo A incluy\u00f3 un an\u00e1lisis electroac\u00fastico, mediciones de o\u00eddo real y ajuste en el auxiliar auditivo basados en los comentarios del usuario. El Protocolo B incluy\u00f3 todas las pruebas del Protocolo A, adem\u00e1s de una prueba\n de audici\u00f3n en ruido, de niveles de molestia en la apreciaci\u00f3n subjetiva de la intensidad y de sonoridad amplificada. Treinta y dos participantes completaron el Perfil Abreviado de Beneficio del Auxiliar Auditivo (APHAB) y la prueba de Satisfacci\u00f3n con la Amplificaci\u00f3n\n en la Vida Diaria (SADL) a los 45 d\u00edas y a los tres meses de la adaptaci\u00f3n inicial. Tuvieron que hacerse menos ajustes en el aud\u00edfono en los auxiliares auditivos de participantes adaptados con el Protocolo B, que en los participantes adaptados con el Protocolo A, pero\n las ganancias finales fueron similares en ambos grupos. Aunque se obtuvieron puntajes APHAB similares en ambos protocolos, los puntajes SADL disminuyeron entre los 45 d\u00edas y los tres meses para el Protocolo A.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.18.6.3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,1]],"date-time":"2017-12-01T15:17:46Z","timestamp":1512141466000},"page":"482-495","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Short-Term and Long-Term Hearing Aid Benefit and User Satisfaction: A Comparison between Two Fitting Protocols"],"prefix":"10.3766","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Lu-Feng","family":"Shi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Karen A.","family":"Doherty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tammy M.","family":"Kordas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joseph T.","family":"Pellegrino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"2087","container-title":["Journal of the American Academy of Audiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ingentaconnect.com\/content\/aaa\/jaaa\/2007\/00000018\/00000006\/art00003","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,5]],"date-time":"2025-02-05T23:16:18Z","timestamp":1738797378000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ingentaconnect.com\/content\/10.3766\/jaaa.18.6.3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,1]]}},"alternative-id":["1050-0545(20070601)18:6L.482;1-"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3766\/jaaa.18.6.3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1050-0545"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1050-0545"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,1]]}}}