{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T12:21:08Z","timestamp":1790684468671,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","issue":"11","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Infect Dev Ctries"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Introduction: Neonatal mortality in developing countries is usually due to an infectious cause.\u00a0 The gold standard of investigation in developing countries is a positive blood culture.\u00a0 It is important to know the aetiology of neonatal bloodstream infections so that empiric treatment can be effective.\u00a0 Methodology: We conducted a retrospective clinical audit over ten years between January 2000 until December 2009, looking at the aetiology of both early and late onset neonatal sepsis.\u00a0 We analysed data from 152 (23%) patient isolates out of 662 suspected cases of neonatal sepsis.\u00a0 Results: Our study revealed that Gram-positive organisms were the predominant cause of both early and late onset sepsis; the common isolates were Staphylococcus epidermidis (34%) and Staphylococcus aureus (27%).\u00a0 There were no isolates of group B Streptococcus.\u00a0 Candida species was isolated only in patients with late onset sepsis (6.9%).\u00a0 Bacterial isolates were relatively sensitive to the commonly used first- and second-line empiric antibiotics. Conclusion: Gram-positive organisms remain the major cause of neonatal bloodstream infections in our setup.\u00a0 The findings of this study will guide clinicians in prescribing the right empiric therapy in cases of suspected neonatal sepsis before the definitive culture results are obtained.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3855\/jidc.1674","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,17]],"date-time":"2011-11-17T20:21:19Z","timestamp":1321561279000},"page":"799-803","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["A ten-year review of neonatal bloodstream infections in a tertiary private hospital in Kenya"],"prefix":"10.3855","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Ruchika","family":"Kohli-Kochhar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Geoffrey","family":"Omuse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gunturu","family":"Revathi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2222","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,18]]},"container-title":["The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jidc.org\/index.php\/journal\/article\/download\/22112734\/630","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/jidc.org\/index.php\/journal\/article\/download\/22112734\/630","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,16]],"date-time":"2019-07-16T00:32:33Z","timestamp":1563237153000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jidc.org\/index.php\/journal\/article\/view\/22112734"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,18]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,15]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3855\/jidc.1674","relation":{},"ISSN":["1972-2680"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1972-2680","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,18]]}}}