{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T11:46:50Z","timestamp":1747223210614,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Pensoft Publishers","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,30]],"date-time":"2020-09-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601424000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["FM"],"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Introduction:<\/jats:bold> Methacrylate-based materials are used daily in dental practice. Specialized publications report these materials as allergens with a high sensitizing potential.<\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p><jats:bold>Aim:<\/jats:bold> To draw the attention of dental doctors and personnel to risk factors of developing occupational allergies.<\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p><jats:bold>Materials and methods:<\/jats:bold> History and dermatological status of the patient were taken and he was given an epicutaneous test.<\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> The allergy testing revealed a strong positive allergic reaction to methacrylates which persisted and was observed at 72 hours as well as on day 7. A diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis was made on the basis of the patient&amp;rsquo;s history, the clinical examination and the results of the epicutaneous test.<\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:<\/jats:bold> The presented clinical case shows that early identification of the specific causative agents allows clinicians to take adequate measures and achieve results without having to use a medicine, and stop the progression of the occupational disease and the development of complications.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3897\/folmed.62.e47846","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,30]],"date-time":"2020-09-30T15:01:14Z","timestamp":1601478074000},"page":"626-630","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Allergic Contact Dermatitis due to Methacrylates in a Dental Technician &amp;ndash; a Clinical Case"],"prefix":"10.3897","volume":"62","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7926-6909","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Atanas","family":"Chonin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Iliyana","family":"Stoeva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"2258","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,30]]},"container-title":["Folia Medica"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/foliamedica.bg\/article\/47846\/download\/pdf\/","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/foliamedica.bg\/article\/47846\/download\/xml\/","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/foliamedica.bg\/article_preview.php?id=47846&skip_redirect=1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,30]],"date-time":"2020-09-30T15:01:14Z","timestamp":1601478074000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/foliamedica.bg\/article\/47846\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,30]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,30]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3897\/folmed.62.e47846","relation":{},"ISSN":["1314-2143","0204-8043"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1314-2143"},{"type":"print","value":"0204-8043"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,30]]}}}