{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T11:07:00Z","timestamp":1791198420699,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"CAIRN","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,20]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>R\u00e9sum\u00e9 L\u2019ouverture du d\u00e9bat et du processus de d\u00e9cision en sant\u00e9 publique \u00e0 de nouveaux acteurs, repose sur des dispositifs permettant de donner la parole \u00e0 des groupes \u00e9clair\u00e9s, tels les praticiens ou des associations de citoyens. Prenant l\u2019exemple de l\u2019audition publique sur la vaccination par le BCG organis\u00e9e en novembre 2006 par la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise de sant\u00e9 publique, cette \u00e9tude questionne le r\u00f4le de ces nouveaux acteurs dans la prise de d\u00e9cision, leur poids face aux avis d\u2019experts et leur influence aupr\u00e8s des d\u00e9cideurs politiques. L\u2019analyse th\u00e9matique qualitative des d\u00e9bats tenus au cours de l\u2019audition publique et au cours du comit\u00e9 d\u2019audition, met en \u00e9vidence que malgr\u00e9 la diversit\u00e9 des acteurs en pr\u00e9sence et leurparticipation aux \u00e9changes, la pluralit\u00e9 des th\u00e8mes abord\u00e9s et la diversit\u00e9 des positionnements, le processus de concertation se tient selon un format relativement contraint. Seul un public averti, compos\u00e9 de m\u00e9decins avec une pratique clinique ou de sant\u00e9 publique, est apte \u00e0 contribuer au d\u00e9bat en r\u00e9agissant \u00e0 des interventions techniques tout en faisant part de leurs exp\u00e9riences de terrain s\u2019imposant comme une forme d\u2019expertise sur le sujet de la vaccination. Cette \u00e9tude discute la notion d\u2019expertise au sein du d\u00e9bat public, qui, pour \u00eatre l\u00e9gitime, doit s\u2019accompagner d\u2019une reconnaissance d\u2019appartenance afin d\u2019installer l\u2019acteur en tant qu\u2019expert.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3917\/spub.084.0371","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,4,10]],"date-time":"2009-04-10T15:48:01Z","timestamp":1239378481000},"page":"371-385","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Du d\u00e9bat \u00e0 la d\u00e9cision\u00a0: discours crois\u00e9s d'experts, de praticiens, de citoyens"],"prefix":"10.3917","volume":"Vol. 20","author":[{"given":"Jo\u00eblle","family":"Kivits","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fran\u00e7oise","family":"Jabot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2273","reference":[{"key":"rb1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1Andersen IE, Jaeger B. Scenario workshops and consensus conferences\u00a0: towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Public Policy, 1999;26(5):331-40.","DOI":"10.3152\/147154399781782301"},{"key":"rb2","unstructured":"2Blanchet A, Gotman A. L\u2019enqu\u00eate et ses m\u00e9thodes. L\u2019entretien. Collection 128, Armand Colin, 2006."},{"key":"rb3","unstructured":"3Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y. Agir dans un monde incertain \u2013 Essai sur la d\u00e9mocratie technique. Le Seuil\u00a0; 2001."},{"key":"rb4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4Chevassus-au-Louis B. L\u2019analyse des risques\u00a0: L\u2019expert, le d\u00e9cideur et le citoyen. Quae \u00c9ditions\u00a0; 2007.","DOI":"10.3917\/quae.cheva.2007.01"},{"key":"rb5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5Dab W. Sant\u00e9 et environnement. Collection Que Sais-je\u00a0? n\u00b0\u00a03771, Presses Universitaires de France\u00a0; 2007.","DOI":"10.3917\/puf.dab.2008.01"},{"key":"rb6","unstructured":"6De Coninck P. L\u2019implication des citoyens ordinaires dans le processus d\u2019aide \u00e0 la d\u00e9cision en sant\u00e9 publique. Ruptures, revue transdisciplinaire en sant\u00e9, 1997;4(2):152-62."},{"key":"rb7","unstructured":"7Ghadi V, Polton D. Le march\u00e9 ou le d\u00e9bat comme instruments de la d\u00e9mocratie. Revue Fran\u00e7aise des Affaires Sociales avril-juin 2000;2."},{"key":"rb8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8Horning G. Citizens\u2019 panels as a form of deliberative technology assessment. Science and Public Policy 1999;26(5):351-9.","DOI":"10.3152\/147154399781782284"},{"key":"rb9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9Joly PB, Marris C. La participation contre mobilisation\u00a0? Une analyse compar\u00e9e du d\u00e9bat sur les OGM en France et au Royaume-Uni. Revue Internationale de Politique Compar\u00e9e 2003;10(2):195-205.","DOI":"10.3917\/ripc.102.0195"},{"key":"rb10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10Joss S. Public participation in science and technology policy \u2013 and decision-making \u2013 ephemeral phenomenon or lasting change\u00a0? Science and public policy 1999;26(5):90-293.","DOI":"10.3152\/147154399781782338"},{"key":"rb11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11Kivits J. \u201cResearching the \u2018Informed Patient\u2019: The Case of Online Health Information Seekers\u201d. Information, Communication & Society 2004;7(4):510-30.","DOI":"10.1080\/1369118042000305629"},{"key":"rb12","unstructured":"12Kvale S. InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage publications; 1996."},{"key":"rb13","unstructured":"13Lascoumes P. Expertise et action publique. Probl\u00e8mes politiques et sociaux, n\u00b0\u00a0912, La Documentation Fran\u00e7aise\u00a0; 2005."},{"key":"rb14","unstructured":"14Lascoumes P, Le Gal\u00e8s P. Sociologie de l\u2019action publique. Collection 128, Armand Colin\u00a0; 2006."},{"key":"rb15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15Martin G. \u201cOrdinary people only\u201d\u00a0: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of health and illness 2008;30(1):35-54.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x"},{"key":"rb16","unstructured":"16Muller P. Les Politiques Publiques. Collection Que sais-je\u00a0? n\u00b0\u00a02534, Presses Universitaires de France\u00a0; 2006."},{"key":"rb17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17Prior L. Belief, knowledge and expertise\u00a0: the emergence of lay expert in medical sociology, Sociology of Health and Illness 2003;25 Silver Anniversary Issue, 41-57.","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9566.00339"},{"key":"rb18","unstructured":"18Rui S. La D\u00e9mocratie en d\u00e9bat\u00a0: Les Citoyens face \u00e0 l\u2019action publique. Armand Colin\u00a0; 2004."},{"key":"rb19","unstructured":"19Salomon D. La dynamique sociale des mobilisations\u00a0: l\u2019exemple des antennes-relais de t\u00e9l\u00e9phonie mobile. Bulletin \u00e9pid\u00e9miologique hebdomadaire 2005;49-50:254-5."},{"key":"rb20","unstructured":"20Tr\u00e9poz JY. La sociologie de l\u2019expertise. Que Sais-je\u00a0? n\u00b0\u00a03119, PUF\u00a0; 1996."},{"key":"rb21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21Zmirou D. De la d\u00e9mocratie en expertise. Le cas des risques sanitaires environnementaux. Sant\u00e9 publique 2006;3:483-500.","DOI":"10.3917\/spub.063.0483"}],"container-title":["Sant\u00e9 Publique"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,15]],"date-time":"2023-12-15T08:40:27Z","timestamp":1702629627000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cairn.info\/revue-sante-publique-2008-4-page-371.htm?ref=doi"}},"subtitle":[""],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,20]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,20]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/spub.084.0371","relation":{},"ISSN":["0995-3914"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0995-3914","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,20]]}}}