{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,11]],"date-time":"2024-12-11T00:08:21Z","timestamp":1733875701100,"version":"3.30.1"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"CAIRN","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Objectif\u2008: L\u2019objectif \u00e9tait de d\u00e9crire le taux de recours aux soins pour infertilit\u00e9 et son \u00e9volution entre 2013 et 2016. M\u00e9thodes\u2008: Nous avons effectu\u00e9 des coupes transversales sur les bases de remboursement de l\u2019Assurance maladie. R\u00e9sultats\u2008: Ce sont 1,69\u2008%\u00a0[IC\u00a095\u2008%\u2008: 1,65\u2008; 1,72] des femmes de 25 \u00e0 43\u00a0ans qui ont b\u00e9n\u00e9fici\u00e9 d\u2019une prestation d\u2019assurance maladie pour un traitement de l\u2019infertilit\u00e9 au cours de l\u2019ann\u00e9e\u00a02016\u2008: 1,5\u2008% ont eu recours \u00e0 l\u2019induction de l\u2019ovulation, 0,7\u2008% au monitorage \u00e9chographique des follicules, 0,3\u2008% au transfert d\u2019embryon et\u00a00,3\u2008% \u00e0 la f\u00e9condation in vitro . Ce recours a augment\u00e9 pour le monitorage \u00e9chographique des\u00a0follicules (+\u200810\u2008%), la FIV-ICSI (+\u200812\u2008%), la cong\u00e9lation d\u2019embryons (+\u200832\u2008%), la d\u00e9cong\u00e9lation d\u2019embryons (+\u200829\u2008%), la cryoconservation d\u2019embryons (+\u200888\u2008%). Il \u00e9tait plus \u00e9lev\u00e9 dans la tranche d\u2019\u00e2ge 30-39\u00a0ans, chez les professions lib\u00e9rales, dans le nord-est et le sud-est de la France, en Corse et en outre-mer, et chez les femmes ayant eu recours \u00e0 des soins \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger. Par ailleurs, 0,19\u2008%\u00a0[IC 95\u2008%\u2008: 0,18\u2008;\u00a00,20] des hommes de 25 \u00e0 49\u00a0ans ont eu recours \u00e0 des soins pour infertilit\u00e9 au cours de l\u2019ann\u00e9e 2016. Ce recours a augment\u00e9 pour la cong\u00e9lation de sperme (+\u200819,18\u2008%) et la cryoconservation de sperme associ\u00e9e \u00e0 un traitement st\u00e9rilisant \u00e0 vis\u00e9e th\u00e9rapeutique (+\u200884,92\u2008%). Conclusion\u2008: Certaines augmentations semblent d\u00e9couler d\u2019un \u00e9largissement des indications. Un suivi sera n\u00e9cessaire en cas d\u2019\u00e9largissement l\u00e9gislatif pour l\u2019acc\u00e8s \u00e0 certaines techniques. Les diff\u00e9rences g\u00e9ographiques rel\u00e8vent-elles de diff\u00e9rence de pr\u00e9valence de l\u2019infertilit\u00e9\u2008?<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3917\/spub.191.0137","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,22]],"date-time":"2019-05-22T00:31:58Z","timestamp":1558485118000},"page":"137-152","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Recours aux soins pour infertilit\u00e9 en secteur priv\u00e9 en France"],"prefix":"10.3917","volume":"Vol. 31","author":[{"given":"Philippe","family":"Ha-Vinh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pierre","family":"R\u00e9gnard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sylvie","family":"Sebahoun-Gil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"2273","reference":[{"key":"rb1","unstructured":"1Fathalla\u00a0MF. Current challenges in assisted reproduction. In\u2008: Vayena\u00a0E, Rowe\u00a0PJ, Griffin\u00a0PD. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction: report of a WHO meeting. Gen\u00e8ve (Suisse): OMS; 2002."},{"key":"rb2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2Polis\u00a0CB, Cox\u00a0CM, Tun\u00e7alp\u00a0\u00d6, McLain\u00a0AC, Thoma\u00a0ME. Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to Demographic and Health Survey data. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1064-74.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex025"},{"key":"rb3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3Cabrera-Le\u00f3n\u00a0A, Lopez-Villaverde\u00a0V, Rueda\u00a0M, Moya-Garrido\u00a0MN. Calibrated prevalence of infertility in 30- to 49-year-old women according to different approaches: a cross-sectional population- based study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(11):2677-85.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev226"},{"key":"rb4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4Bhattacharya\u00a0S, Porter\u00a0M, Amalraj\u00a0E, Templeton\u00a0A, Hamilton\u00a0M, Lee\u00a0AJ, et al. The epidemiology of intertility in the North East of Scotland. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3096-107.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep287"},{"key":"rb5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5Schmidt\u00a0L, M\u00fcnster\u00a0K, Helm\u00a0P. Infertility and the seeking of infertility treatment in a representative study population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102: 978-84.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10905.x"},{"key":"rb6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6Gunnel\u00a0DJ, Ewings\u00a0P. Infertility prevalence, needs assessment and purchasing. J Public Health Med. 1994;16(1):29-35.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042931"},{"key":"rb7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7Boivin\u00a0J, Bunting\u00a0L, Collins\u00a0JA, Nygren\u00a0KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and\u00a0demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6): 1506.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem046"},{"key":"rb8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8Oakley\u00a0L. Lifetime prevalence of infertility and infertility treatment in the UK: results from a population-based survey of reproduction. HumReprod. 2008;23:447-50.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem369"},{"key":"rb9","unstructured":"9Chandra\u00a0A, Copen\u00a0CE, Stephen\u00a0EH. Infertility service use in the United States: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982-2010. Natl Health Stat Report. 2014;(73):1-21."},{"key":"rb10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10Inhorn\u00a0MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli\u00a0D. Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2008;37:177-96.","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085230"},{"key":"rb11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11Devolder\u00a0K, Harris\u00a0J. The ambiguity of the embryo: ethical inconsistency in the human embryonic stem cell debate. Metaphilosophy. 2007;38(2-3):153-69.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9973.2007.00480.x"},{"key":"rb12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12Harris\u00a0J. No sex selection please, we\u2019re British. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2005;31(5):286-8.","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2004.008870"},{"key":"rb13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"13Merchant, J. Une gestation pour autrui \u00ab\u2008\u00e9thique\u2008\u00bb est possible. Travail, genre et soci\u00e9t\u00e9s. 2012;28(2):183-9.","DOI":"10.3917\/tgs.028.0183"},{"key":"rb14","unstructured":"14Robertson\u00a0JA. Children of Choice, Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton (\u00c9tats-Unis): Princeton University Press; 1994. ISBN9780691036656,\u00a0291 p."},{"key":"rb15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15Dumitru\u00a0S. Libert\u00e9 de procr\u00e9ation et manipulation g\u00e9n\u00e9tique. Pour une critique d\u2019Habermas. Raisons politiques. 2003;12(4):31-54.","DOI":"10.3917\/rai.012.0031"},{"key":"rb16","unstructured":"16Kuhse\u00a0H. Patient-centred ethical issues raised by the procurement and use of gametes and embryos in assisted reproduction. In\u2008: Vayena\u00a0E, Rowe\u00a0PJ, Griffin\u00a0PD (dir.). Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction\u2008: report of a WHO meeting. Gen\u00e8ve (Suisse): OMS; 2002. p.\u00a0315-9."},{"key":"rb17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17Ferraretti\u00a0AP, Goossens\u00a0V, Kupka\u00a0M, Bhattacharya\u00a0S, de Mouzon\u00a0J, Castilla\u00a0JA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2318-31.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det278"},{"key":"rb18","unstructured":"18Harris\u00a0K, Fitzgerald\u00a0O, Paul\u00a0RC, Macaldowie\u00a0A, Lee\u00a0E, Chambers\u00a0GM. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2014. Sydney (Australie): National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, the University of New South Wales; 2016. 85\u00a0p."},{"key":"rb19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19Kessler\u00a0LM, Craig\u00a0BM, Plosker\u00a0SM, Reed\u00a0DR, Quinn\u00a0GP. Infertility evaluation and treatment among women in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):1025-32.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.05.040"},{"key":"rb20","unstructured":"20Agence de la biom\u00e9decine. Le rapport m\u00e9dical et scientifique de l\u2019assistance m\u00e9dicale \u00e0 la procr\u00e9ation et de la g\u00e9n\u00e9tique humaines en France\u2008: Activit\u00e9 d\u2019assistance m\u00e9dicale \u00e0 la procr\u00e9ation 2014. Saint-Denis La Plaine\u2008: Agence de la biom\u00e9decine\u2008; 2016. [Visit\u00e9 le 25\/03\/2018]. En ligne\u2008: https:\/\/www.agence-biomedecine.fr\/annexes\/bilan2015\/donnees\/procreation\/01-amp\/pdf\/amp.pdf."},{"key":"rb21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21Sunderam\u00a0S, Kissin\u00a0DM, Crawford\u00a0SB, Folger\u00a0SG, Jamieson\u00a0DJ, Warner\u00a0L, Barfield\u00a0WD. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance\u00a0\u2013\u00a0United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015;64(11): 1-25.","DOI":"10.15585\/mmwr.ss6411a1"},{"key":"rb22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22Bensdorp\u00a0AJ, Tjon-Kon-Fat\u00a0RI, Bossuyt\u00a0PM\u00a0Koks\u00a0CA, Oosterhuis\u00a0GJ, Hoek\u00a0A, et al. Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7771.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7771"},{"key":"rb23","unstructured":"23Rongieres\u00a0C. Assistance m\u00e9dicale \u00e0 la procr\u00e9ation Quelle option th\u00e9rapeutique en cas d\u2019infertilit\u00e9 inexpliqu\u00e9e\u2008: ins\u00e9mination intra-ut\u00e9rine ou f\u00e9condation in vitro\u2008? M\u00e9decine th\u00e9rapeutique\/ M\u00e9decine de la reproduction, gyn\u00e9cologie et endocrinologie. 2015;17(2):100-6."},{"key":"rb24","unstructured":"24Fichtali\u00a0K, Houmaid\u00a0H, Fakher\u00a0B, Ait\u00a0Benkaddour\u00a0Y, Aboulfalah\u00a0A, Asmouki\u00a0H, et al. Ins\u00e9mination intra-ut\u00e9rine\u2008: quelle place en 2011\u2008? M\u00e9decine de la Reproduction, Gyn\u00e9cologie Endocrinologie. 2011;13(2):85-90."},{"key":"rb25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"25ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(3):265-77.","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmp003"},{"key":"rb26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"26Roz\u00e9e\u00a0V, Mazuy\u00a0M. L\u2019infertilit\u00e9 dans les couples h\u00e9t\u00e9rosexuels\u2008: genre\u00a0et \u00ab\u2008gestion\u2008\u00bb de l\u2019\u00e9chec. Sciences sociales et sant\u00e9. 2012;30(4): 5-30.","DOI":"10.1684\/sss.2012.0401"},{"key":"rb27","unstructured":"27R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise. Article L.\u00a02141-1 du Code de la sant\u00e9 publique. [Visit\u00e9 le 25\/03\/2018]. En ligne\u2008: https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&idArticle=LEGIARTI000006687417."},{"key":"rb28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"28Maheshwari\u00a0A, Pandey\u00a0S, Shetty\u00a0A, Hamilton\u00a0M, Bhattacharya\u00a0S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2): 368-77.e1-9.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019"},{"key":"rb29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"29Blennborn\u00a0M, Hellberg\u00a0D, Nilsson\u00a0S. Differences in female and male perception of information and decision-making in single-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization in Sweden. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(8):337-42.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-007-9132-y"},{"key":"rb30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30Kushnir\u00a0VA, Barad\u00a0DH, Albertini\u00a0DF, Darmon\u00a0SK, Gleicher\u00a0N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):6.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-016-0225-2"},{"key":"rb31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"31Takahashi\u00a0S, Fujita\u00a0M, Fujimoto\u00a0A, et al. The decision-making process for the fate of frozen embryos by Japanese infertile women: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2012;13:9.","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6939-13-9"},{"key":"rb32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"32Hoffman\u00a0DI, Zellman\u00a0GL, Fair\u00a0CC, Mayer\u00a0JF, Zeitz\u00a0JG, Gibbons\u00a0WE, Turner\u00a0TG\u00a0Jr. Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(5):1063-9.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00172-9"},{"key":"rb33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"33Baylis\u00a0F, Beagan\u00a0B, Johnston\u00a0J, Ram\u00a0N. Cryopreserved human embryos in Canada and their availability for research. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25(12):1026-31.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30344-9"},{"key":"rb34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"34Deonandan\u00a0R. Recent trends in reproductive tourism and international surrogacy: ethical considerations and challenges for policy. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 2015;8:111-9.","DOI":"10.2147\/RMHP.S63862"},{"key":"rb35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"35Pennings\u00a0G. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(12):2689-94.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh486"},{"key":"rb36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"36Inhorn\u00a0MC, Patrizio\u00a0P. Rethinking reproductive \u2018\u2018tourism\u2019\u2019 as reproductive \u2018\u2018exile\u2019\u2019. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(3):904-6.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.01.055"},{"key":"rb37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"37Shenfield\u00a0F, de\u00a0Mouzon\u00a0J, Pennings\u00a0G, Ferraretti\u00a0AP, Nyboe\u00a0Andersen\u00a0A, de\u00a0Wert\u00a0G, et al. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Human Reproduction. 2010;25(6):1361-8.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq057"},{"key":"rb38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"38Blyth\u00a0E, Farrand\u00a0A. Reproductive tourism \u2013 a price worth paying for\u00a0reproductive autonomy? Critical Social Policy. 2005;25(1): 91-114.","DOI":"10.1177\/0261018305048969"},{"key":"rb39","unstructured":"39Agence de la biom\u00e9decine. Encadrement international de la bio\u00e9thique\u2008: Actualisation 2010. Saint-Denis La\u00a0Plaine\u2008: Agence de la biom\u00e9decine\u2008; 2010. [Visit\u00e9 le 25\/03\/2018]. En ligne\u2008: https:\/\/www.agence-biomedecine.fr\/IMG\/pdf\/document_encadrement_juridik2010.pdf."},{"key":"rb40","unstructured":"40R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise. Article L.\u00a02141-11 du Code de la sant\u00e9 publique. [Visit\u00e9 le 25\/03\/2018]. En ligne\u2008: https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&idArticle=LEGIARTI000006687438&dateTexte=&categorieLien=cid."},{"key":"rb41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"41Tuppin\u00a0P, Rudant\u00a0J, Constantinou\u00a0P, Gastaldi-M\u00e9nager\u00a0C, Rachas\u00a0A, et al. Value of a national administrative database to guide public decisions: From the syst\u00e8me national d\u2019information interr\u00e9gimes de l\u2019Assurance Maladie (SNIIRAM) to the syst\u00e8me national des donn\u00e9es de sant\u00e9 (SNDS) in France. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017;65(Suppl.\u00a04):S149-S167.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respe.2017.05.004"},{"key":"rb42","unstructured":"42Bouyer\u00a0J, de\u00a0La\u00a0Rochebrochard\u00a0E, Sarlon\u00a0E, Br\u00e9art\u00a0G. Surveillance dans le domaine de la reproduction et de la p\u00e9rinatalit\u00e9. Saint-Maurice (France)\u2008: Institut de veille sanitaire\u2008; 2004. 83\u00a0p."},{"key":"rb43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"43Wysowski\u00a0DK. Use of fertility drugs in the United States, 1973 through 1991. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(6):1096-8.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56417-6"},{"key":"rb44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"44Mosgaard\u00a0B, Lidegaard\u00a0O, Andersen\u00a0AN. Use of fertility drugs in Denmark 1973-1993: An analysis based on sale statistics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74(8):614-8.","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349509013473"},{"key":"rb45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"45Auger\u00a0J, Jouannet\u00a0P. Evidence for regional differences of semen quality among fertile French men. F\u00e9d\u00e9ration fran\u00e7aise des Centres d\u2019\u00e9tude et de conservation des \u0153ufs et du sperme humains. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(4):740-5.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.4.740"},{"key":"rb46","unstructured":"46Bujan\u00a0L, Auger J. \u00c9volution temporelle et g\u00e9ographique des caract\u00e9ristiques du sperme en France et dans le monde. Quo vadis\u2008? BEH. 2012;(7-8-9):91-7."}],"container-title":["Sant\u00e9 Publique"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,7]],"date-time":"2023-12-07T22:58:59Z","timestamp":1701989939000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cairn.info\/revue-sante-publique-2019-1-page-137.htm?ref=doi"}},"subtitle":[""],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/spub.191.0137","relation":{},"ISSN":["0995-3914"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0995-3914"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,14]]}}}