{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T05:20:05Z","timestamp":1789536005582,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"SLACK, Inc.","issue":"10","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Orthopedics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,11]]},"abstract":"\n We selected 86 cases for the study: 50 navigated revision total knee replacements (TKRs) and 36 conventional revision TKRs. We hypothesized that the rate of satisfactory implantation would be higher for navigated revision TKR than for conventional revision TKR. The primary criterion was the rate of optimally implanted prostheses on postoperative anteroposterior and lateral long leg radiographs. Thirty-one navigated cases (62%) and 14 conventional cases (39%) had an optimal global implantation (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n <.05). The use of a standard navigation software for revision TKR allows a significant improvement of the accuracy of implantation. However, development of dedicated software will allow addressing more precisely the specific features of a revision TKR, such as stem extension navigation, defects filling, and joint line reconstruction.\n <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20100510-55","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,18]],"date-time":"2010-10-18T20:07:54Z","timestamp":1287432474000},"page":"58-61","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Navigated Revision TKR: A Comparative Study with Conventional Instruments"],"prefix":"10.3928","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Jean-Yves","family":"Jenny","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yann","family":"Diesinger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2308","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200211000-00028"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-0945-0"},{"issue":"367","key":"e_1_3_1_4_2","first-page":"165","article-title":"Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty","author":"Partington PF","year":"1999","unstructured":"Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J. Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (367):165\u2013171.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2005.02.002"},{"issue":"321","key":"e_1_3_1_6_2","first-page":"106","article-title":"Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty","author":"Teter KE","year":"1995","unstructured":"Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (321):106\u2013110.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_1_7_2","first-page":"18","article-title":"Mise en place des proth\u00e8ses totales du genou assist\u00e9e par ordinateur: comparaison avec la technique conventionnelle","volume":"87","author":"Saragaglia D","year":"2001","unstructured":"Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Mise en place des proth\u00e8ses totales du genou assist\u00e9e par ordinateur: comparaison avec la technique conventionnelle. Rev Chir Orthop. 2001; 87(1):18\u201328.","journal-title":"Rev Chir Orthop"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.85B6.13722"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000147710.69612.76"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00132-006-0997-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/10929080109146086"},{"issue":"248","key":"e_1_3_1_12_2","first-page":"13","article-title":"Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system","author":"Insall JN","year":"1989","unstructured":"Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248):13\u201314.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00004424-199101000-00013"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-004-0507-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/10929080802230846"},{"issue":"10","key":"e_1_3_1_16_2","first-page":"132","article-title":"Computer-assisted surgery in revision total knee arthroplasty: early experience with 46 patients","volume":"30","author":"Thielemann FW","year":"2007","unstructured":"Thielemann FW, Clemens U, Hadjicostas PT. Computer-assisted surgery in revision total knee arthroplasty: early experience with 46 patients. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(10 Suppl):132\u2013135.","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0429-7"}],"container-title":["Orthopedics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.slackinc.com\/doi\/resolver.asp?doi=10.3928\/01477447-20100510-55","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,2]],"date-time":"2023-05-02T15:05:07Z","timestamp":1683039907000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/01477447-20100510-55"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,11]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3928\/01477447-20100510-55"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01477447-20100510-55","relation":{},"ISSN":["0147-7447","1938-2367"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0147-7447","type":"print"},{"value":"1938-2367","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,11]]}}}