{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T21:35:41Z","timestamp":1760132141174,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"SLACK, Inc.","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Orthopedics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Despite improvements in implant technology and surgical technique, failure of total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a persistent problem. This article reports clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 42 months using the Restoration cone\/conical modular femoral revision stem (Stryker, Newbury, United Kingdom).<\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p>\n            A prospective cohort study was performed of 46 consecutive patients who underwent revision THA between January 2004 and June 2007. Patients were reviewed pre- and postoperatively at regular intervals for clinical and radiological assessment. Forty-six patients (17 men, 29 women) with a mean age of 72 years (range, 44\u201393 years) were observed for a mean of 42 months (range, 28\u201366 months). Indications for surgery included aseptic loosening\/osteolysis (38\/46 [83%]), periprosthetic fracture (4\/46 [9%]), and infection (4\/46 [8%]). Median time from index procedure was 16 years (range, 1\u201326 years). No patient was lost to follow-up. Two patients (4%) with well-fixed asymptomatic stems died during follow-up. Three patients (7%) sustained an early postoperative dislocation. One patient sustained a periprosthetic fracture after a fall. This was treated by osteosynthesis, and stem revision was not required. Mean Oxford Hip Score improved from 42 points (range, 24\u201357 points) to 28 points (range, 18\u201351 points) at 3-month follow-up (\n            <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n            =.003). Median stem subsidence was 1.0 mm (standard error of the mean, \u00b11.7 mm; range, 0\u20137mm) at last follow-up. No patient developed loosening or osteolysis around the stem. The Restoration femoral revision system has favorable clinical and radiological outcomes at a mean follow-up of 42 months.\n          <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20101123-02","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,6]],"date-time":"2011-01-06T14:17:24Z","timestamp":1294323444000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Outcome After Femoral Revision Using the Restoration Cone\/conical Femoral Revision Stem"],"prefix":"10.3928","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Graeme","family":"Holt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Janet","family":"McCaul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bryn","family":"Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roland","family":"Ingram","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andrew","family":"Stark","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"2308","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200202000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199307000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0883-5403(94)90076-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.91B4.21319"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B8.20390"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.82B1.9802"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00064-007-1195-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s002640000135"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-0937-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200412000-00020"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00013611-199906000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.00952"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.H.00155"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200210000-00008"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199508000-00012"}],"container-title":["Orthopedics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.slackinc.com\/doi\/resolver.asp?doi=10.3928\/01477447-20101123-02","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,3]],"date-time":"2023-05-03T05:53:07Z","timestamp":1683093187000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/01477447-20101123-02"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,3]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3928\/01477447-20101123-02"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01477447-20101123-02","relation":{},"ISSN":["0147-7447","1938-2367"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0147-7447"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1938-2367"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,3]]},"article-number":"01477447-20101123-02"}}