{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,22]],"date-time":"2025-10-22T18:28:52Z","timestamp":1761157732047},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"SLACK, Inc.","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Orthopedics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n            This study examined function, pain, satisfaction, and radiologic outcomes among patients treated with first metatarsophalangeal hemiarthroplasty. Patients were invited to participate in an outcome study conducted with questionnaires on subjective and objective outcomes and clinical and radiographic follow-up. A total of 12 patients (12 feet; mean patient age, 58.8\u00b112.3 years) agreed to participate. Mean follow-up was 22.3\u00b119.8 months. Of these patients, 7 were satisfied with the postoperative result. The mean visual analog scale pain score decreased significantly from 7.0\u00b12.3 preoperatively to 3.5\u00b13.3 postoperatively (\n            <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n            =.024). Mean passive range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint was 32\u00b0\u00b110\u00b0 preoperatively, 93\u00b0\u00b118\u00b0 intraoperatively after implantation of the prosthesis and closure of the joint capsule, and 38\u00b0\u00b119\u00b0 at final follow-up (\n            <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n            =.26). Mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society forefoot score increased significantly from 47.3\u00b114.7 preoperatively to 71.8\u00b115.2 at last follow-up (\n            <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n            =.033). During the follow-up period, 6 patients underwent additional procedures: 5 therapeutic joint infiltrations and 1 arthrodesis. No patients had radiologic loosening of the implant at final follow-up. Osseous dysplastic changes at the base of the proximal phalanx were noted among 6 of 11 patients (12 total cases) at final follow-up. Although first metatarsophalangeal hemiarthroplasty provided significant pain reduction at mean follow-up of 22.3 months, range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint was not restored to anticipated levels and there were high rates of patient dissatisfaction and secondary interventions. [\n            <jats:italic>Orthopedics.<\/jats:italic>\n            2018; 41(1):e64\u2013e69.]\n          <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20171114-03","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,20]],"date-time":"2017-11-20T20:00:29Z","timestamp":1511208029000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Metatarsophalangeal Hemiarthroplasty: A Review of 12 Consecutive Cases"],"prefix":"10.3928","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Florian","family":"Wanivenhaus","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jacqueline","family":"Fust","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthias","family":"Erschbamer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Schirm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"2308","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173100-00002"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","first-page":"171","article-title":"The increasing recognition of medullary lysis, cortical osteophytic proliferation, and fragmentation of implanted silicone polymer implants","volume":"32","author":"Freed JB","year":"1993","unstructured":"Freed JB. The increasing recognition of medullary lysis, cortical osteophytic proliferation, and fragmentation of implanted silicone polymer implants. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1993; 32(2):171\u2013179.","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2009.11.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2012.0560"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100716637901"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2010.04.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100713478930"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BTF.0b013e318165c356"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198801000-00025"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12306-016-0410-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3944\/AOTT.2012.2610"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199903000-00009"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fcl.2015.04.007"}],"container-title":["Orthopedics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.healio.com\/doiresolver?doi=10.3928\/01477447-20171114-03","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,3]],"date-time":"2023-05-03T07:35:17Z","timestamp":1683099317000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/01477447-20171114-03"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3928\/01477447-20171114-03"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01477447-20171114-03","relation":{},"ISSN":["0147-7447","1938-2367"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0147-7447","type":"print"},{"value":"1938-2367","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]}}}