{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T22:12:26Z","timestamp":1785190346164,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"SLACK, Inc.","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Refract Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To evaluate the monocular and binocular visual outcomes of LASIK with a non-linear aspheric micro-monovision protocol for the correction of myopic astigmatism and presbyopia.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A retrospective, noncomparative case series included 310 eyes of 155 consecutive patients with myopic astigmatism and presbyopia who were treated with LASIK-induced micro-monovision. The Carl Zeiss Meditec CRS-Master software and MEL 80 excimer laser were used. The target refraction was plano for distance eyes (dominant eye) and between \u22120.75 and \u22122.00 diopters (D) for near eyes. Patients were followed for 1 year. Mean attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SE) correction was \u22123.59\u00b11.79 D (range: \u22120.20 to \u22128.31 D). Mean attempted cylinder correction was 0.84\u00b10.63 D (range: 0 to 2.50 D). Median patient age was 49 years (range: 43 to 63 years). Median follow-up was 12.5 months.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Outcome measures after all treatments were as follows. Achieved SE correction was within \u00b10.50 D in 92% and within \u00b11.00 D in 99% of eyes. Monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20\/20 in 99% and 20\/32 in 100% of distance eyes. Binocular uncorrected near visual acuity was J2 in 96% and J5 in 100% of patients. Binocular uncorrected visual acuity was 20\/20 and J5 in 99% of patients. No eyes lost 2 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. There was no change in mesopic contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000) at all spatial frequencies. The average change in refraction between 3 months and 1 year was \u22120.06\u00b10.31 D.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This non-linear aspheric myopic micro-monovision protocol was well-tolerated, stable, and effective for treating patients with presbyopia in moderate to high myopic astigmatism.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597x-20100212-04","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,5]],"date-time":"2010-03-05T16:40:56Z","timestamp":1267807256000},"page":"23-37","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":107,"title":["LASIK for Myopic Astigmatism and Presbyopia Using Non-Linear Aspheric Micro-Monovision with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 Platform"],"prefix":"10.3928","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Dan Z.","family":"Reinstein","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Timothy J.","family":"Archer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marine","family":"Gobbe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2308","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)80123-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","volume-title":"Refractive Keratotomy for Myopia and Astigmatism","author":"Waring GO","year":"1991","unstructured":"Waring GO. Refractive Keratotomy for Myopia and Astigmatism. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1991."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1542-8877-19870501-08"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01001-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20040701-04"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","first-page":"186","article-title":"Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) [Hebrew]","volume":"145","author":"Levinger E","year":"2006","unstructured":"Levinger E, Geyer O, Baltinsky Y, Levinger S. Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) [Hebrew]. Harefuah. 2006;145:186\u2013190, 246\u2013287.","journal-title":"Harefuah"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(03)00462-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20090101-07"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-19980701-14"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0042-6989(98)00317-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20050901-23"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(93)31500-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20060301-12"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20060101-16"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","first-page":"459","article-title":"Standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery","volume":"16","author":"Waring GO","year":"2000","unstructured":"Waring GO. Standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:459\u2013466.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20091016-01"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20020901-30"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","unstructured":"FDA. Checklist of Information Usually Submitted in an Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) Application for Refractive Surgery Lasers 1997. Available at: http:\/www.fda.gov\/downloads\/MedicalDevices\/DeviceRegulationandGuidance\/GuidanceDocuments\/ucm080250.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ico.0000178722.19317.7b"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2007.09.018"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","volume-title":"Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application","author":"Adler F","year":"1987","unstructured":"Adler F. Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application. 8th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1987.","edition":"8"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","first-page":"203","article-title":"Potential range of clear vision in monovision","volume":"59","author":"Erickson P","year":"1988","unstructured":"Erickson P. Potential range of clear vision in monovision. J Am Optom Assoc. 1988;59:203\u2013205.","journal-title":"J Am Optom Assoc"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-199210000-00003"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_2","first-page":"366","article-title":"The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis)","volume":"104","author":"Durrie DS","year":"2006","unstructured":"Durrie DS. The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:366\u2013401.","journal-title":"Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2007.00488.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_2","volume-title":"Clinical Visual Optics","author":"Bennett AG","year":"1998","unstructured":"Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB. Clinical Visual Optics. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd; 1998.","edition":"3"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1912.04270090254042"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2005.02.057"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.01.092"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.09.033"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.07.029"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2005.04.037"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.11.020"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.03.052"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-198811000-00001"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.01.054"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20050501-05"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20080901-07"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.07-1616"}],"container-title":["Journal of Refractive Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.slackinc.com\/doi\/resolver.asp?doi=10.3928\/1081597X-20100212-04","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,3]],"date-time":"2023-05-03T07:29:42Z","timestamp":1683098982000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/1081597X-20100212-04"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,1]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3928\/1081597X-20100212-04"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081597x-20100212-04","relation":{},"ISSN":["1081-597X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1081-597X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,1]]}}}