{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T10:50:24Z","timestamp":1782730224550,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"SLACK, Inc.","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Refract Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>PURPOSE:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To compare femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery without the use of ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) with standard phacoemulsification using OVD.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This was a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of 37 patients (74 eyes) diagnosed as having significant cataract in both eyes. Randomly, one eye underwent standard phacoemulsification with OVD (the OVD group); this group acted as controls. The other eye was treated with the femtosecond laser; the subsequent manual part of the procedure was performed without OVD (non-OVD group). Time of surgery, amount of fluid used during phacoemulsification, central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, endothelial cell count, and visual acuity were documented over the 6-month follow-up.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>\n              There were no major complications and no significant difference in overall surgery time (non-OVD: 375 \u00b1 81 seconds; OVD: 362 \u00b1 43 seconds;\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              = .713) and in the quantity of fluid passing through the eye (non-OVD: 187 \u00b1 35 mL; OVD: 186 \u00b1 27 mL;\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              = .952) between groups. Endothelial cell loss after 6 months was not significantly different between groups (non-OVD: \u22122.4%; OVD: \u22122.7%;\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              = .880). Central corneal thickness was not different at 1 week postoperatively between groups (non-OVD: 575 \u00b1 45\n              <jats:italic>\u00b5<\/jats:italic>\n              m; OVD: 573 \u00b1 46\n              <jats:italic>\u00b5<\/jats:italic>\n              m;\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              = .820). Three patients in the OVD group and one patient in the non-OVD group experienced intraocular pressure greater than 25 mm Hg at 1 day postoperatively. There were no significant differences in corrected distance visual acuity between groups (logMAR non-OVD: 0.024; OVD: 0.038;\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              = .461).\n            <\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Femtosecond laser-assisted treatment allows the cataract surgeon to perform phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation without the use of OVD at no additional risk to the corneal endothelium. Furthermore, there was a tendency toward fewer increases in intraocular pressure in patients treated with the femtosecond laser.<\/jats:p>\n            <jats:p>\n              <jats:bold>\n                [\n                <jats:italic>J Refract Surg<\/jats:italic>\n                . 2015;31(3):146\u2013152.]\n              <\/jats:bold>\n            <\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597x-20150220-01","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,9]],"date-time":"2015-03-09T18:47:59Z","timestamp":1425926879000},"page":"146-152","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Without OVD: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison"],"prefix":"10.3928","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Marc","family":"Schargus","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nathanael","family":"Suckert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tim","family":"Schultz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vinodh","family":"Kakkassery","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H. Burkhard","family":"Dick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2308","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0b013e3282f14db0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(85)90363-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.015"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)00361-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(02)01271-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.04.018"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/112067210701700106"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.06.053"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","first-page":"315","article-title":"The effect of prophylactic acetazolamide on the intraocular pressure rise associated with Healon-aided intraocular lens surgery","volume":"17","author":"Lewen R","year":"1985","unstructured":"Lewen R, Insler MS. The effect of prophylactic acetazolamide on the intraocular pressure rise associated with Healon-aided intraocular lens surgery. Ann Ophthalmol. 1985;17:315\u2013318.","journal-title":"Ann Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(14)74269-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1542-8877-19810701-07"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20091117-04"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20121116-02"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.07.023"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20130816-02"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1993.01090060119035"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.05.033"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.02.070"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.11.045"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.12406"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20120508-02"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0301-4738.45500"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.85.2.139"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.09.012"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s004170000192"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80979-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.1975.tb00402.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_2","unstructured":"Leaming D. Comparison of 2013 ESCRS member practice survey with past surveys. Available at: www.analeyz.com\/20042013ESCRSSurveys.pdf. Accessed January 1 2015."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-012-2242-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-5173(02)00438-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/112067210301300209"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00055735-200402000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(03)00577-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)00410-1"}],"container-title":["Journal of Refractive Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/doiresolver?doi=10.3928\/1081597X-20150220-01","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,2]],"date-time":"2023-05-02T21:54:19Z","timestamp":1683064459000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/1081597X-20150220-01"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3928\/1081597X-20150220-01"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081597x-20150220-01","relation":{},"ISSN":["1081-597X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1081-597X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]}}}