{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T23:07:08Z","timestamp":1781564828134,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"SLACK, Inc.","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Refract Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>PURPOSE:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To calculate the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) following LASIK and identify any association between SIA and the target induced astigmatism (TIA) at 1 year postoperatively.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The SIA was calculated using the TIA and residual astigmatism values for [A] myopic astigmatism and [B] mixed astigmatism treated with either the [I] WaveLight Allegretto EyeQ 400-Hz (Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Fort Worth, TX) or [II] Schwind Amaris 750S (Schwind eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) platforms. The TIA and corresponding SIA results were analyzed using various techniques.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>\n              Key findings were the negative SIA power (y\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              ) was significantly correlated with negative TIA power (x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              ) and sine of the TIA axis (x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              ) as follows: [A] I, y\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              = 0.829x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              \u20130.403x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              \u20130.325 (\n              <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>\n              = 87.76,\n              <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n              = 0.804,\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              &lt; .001, n = 127); II, y\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              = 0.891x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              \u20130.037x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              \u20130.192 (\n              <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>\n              = 240.06,\n              <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n              = 0.901,\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              &lt; .001, n = 119) and [B] I, y\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              = 1.063x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.233x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.411 (\n              <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>\n              = 990.99,\n              <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n              = 0.881,\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              &lt; .001, n = 61); II, y\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              = 1.029x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              \u20130.115x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.322 (\n              <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>\n              = 270.12,\n              <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n              = 0.908,\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              &lt; 0.001, n = 111). The sine of negative SIA axis (y\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              ) was significantly correlated with negative TIA power (x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              ) and TIA axis (x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              ) as follows: [A] I, y\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              = 0.951x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              \u20130.007x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.008 (\n              <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>\n              = 446.58,\n              <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n              = 0.950,\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              &lt; .001, n = 127); II, y\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              = 0.856x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.007x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.105 (\n              <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>\n              = 277.18,\n              <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n              = 0.912,\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              &lt; .001, n = 119) and [B] I, y\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              = 0.953x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.009x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.075 (\n              <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>\n              = 362.6,\n              <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n              = 0.963,\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              &lt; .001, n = 61); II, y\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              = 0.977x\n              <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n              \u20130.004x\n              <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n              +0.002 (\n              <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>\n              = 2910.9,\n              <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n              = 0.990,\n              <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n              &lt; .001, n = 111).\n            <\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The predicted SIA power was up to 12% less than expected in cases of \u22126.00 diopters cylinder treated for myopic astigmatism using the Allegretto platform. The mean predicted angle of error (the angle between the SIA and TIA axes) was less than 4\u00b0, increasing to 12\u00b0 for against-the-rule astigmatism. The Allegretto platform tended toward a clockwise axis rotational error, whereas the Amaris platform tended toward the opposite.<\/jats:p>\n            <jats:p>\n              <jats:bold>\n                [\n                <jats:italic>J Refract Surg.<\/jats:italic>\n                2017;33(2):104\u2013109.]\n              <\/jats:bold>\n            <\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597x-20161102-01","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,13]],"date-time":"2017-02-13T18:11:49Z","timestamp":1487009509000},"page":"104-109","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A Critical Evaluation of Refractive Outcomes Following LASIK for Moderate to High Astigmatism Using Two Excimer Laser Platforms"],"prefix":"10.3928","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Sudi","family":"Patel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maja","family":"Bohac","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alma","family":"Biscevic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mateja","family":"Koncarevic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marija","family":"Anticic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nikica","family":"Gabric","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2308","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.85.9.1127"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1475-1313.2001.00596.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80617-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-014-2776-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","first-page":"112","article-title":"A new and remarkably sensitive test for astigmatism","volume":"7","author":"Duncombe KO","year":"1933","unstructured":"Duncombe KO. A new and remarkably sensitive test for astigmatism. Br J Physiol Optics. 1933;7:112\u20131128.","journal-title":"Br J Physiol Optics"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1942.00880100066005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","first-page":"355","article-title":"The effect of axis errors on prescription comfort","volume":"115","author":"Fearn WWL","year":"1948","unstructured":"Fearn WWL. The effect of axis errors on prescription comfort. Optician. 1948;115:355\u2013357.","journal-title":"Optician"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","first-page":"55","article-title":"To tilt or not to tilt: a controversy rehashed","volume":"14","author":"Anderson FR","year":"1969","unstructured":"Anderson FR. To tilt or not to tilt: a controversy rehashed. Surv Ophthalmol. 1969;14:55\u201360.","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0039-6257(77)90054-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80312-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","first-page":"11","article-title":"A comparison of errors in some methods of subjective refraction","volume":"13","author":"Jennings JAM","year":"1973","unstructured":"Jennings JAM, Charman WN. A comparison of errors in some methods of subjective refraction. The Ophthalmic Optician. 1973;13:11\u201318.","journal-title":"The Ophthalmic Optician"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","first-page":"577","article-title":"Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction","volume":"8","author":"Rosenfield M","year":"1995","unstructured":"Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;8:577\u2013579.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2006.00695.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2012.11.027"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.07.037"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2008.04.010"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.08.054"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20131029-03"}],"container-title":["Journal of Refractive Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/ophthalmology\/journals\/jrs\/2017-2-33-2\/%7B06884b5f-ab66-430e-8a95-01353ac1bbbb%7D\/a-critical-evaluation-of-refractive-outcomes-following-lasik-for-moderate-to-high-astigmatism-using-two-excimer-laser-platforms","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,3]],"date-time":"2023-05-03T07:23:25Z","timestamp":1683098605000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/1081597X-20161102-01"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3928\/1081597X-20161102-01"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081597x-20161102-01","relation":{},"ISSN":["1081-597X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1081-597X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]}}}