{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,18]],"date-time":"2025-10-18T10:55:55Z","timestamp":1760784955656},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["NHM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.3934\/nhm.2021006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,23]],"date-time":"2021-02-23T01:12:15Z","timestamp":1614042735000},"page":"257","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Opinion fitness and convergence to consensus in homogeneous and heterogeneous populations"],"prefix":"10.3934","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Mayte","family":"P\u00e9rez-Llanos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Juan Pablo","family":"Pinasco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Nicolas","family":"Saintier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"2321","reference":[{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"G. Aletti, A. K. Naimzada and G. Naldi., Mathematics and physics applications in sociodynamics simulation: The case of opinion formation and diffusion, <i>Mathematical Modeling of Collective Behavior in Socio-Economic and Life Sciences<\/i>, Birkh\u00e4user Boston, (2010), 203\u2013221.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-8176-4946-3_8"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"G. Aletti, G. Naldi, G. Toscani.First-order continuous models of opinion formation, <i>SIAM J. Appl. Math.<\/i>, <b>67<\/b> (2007), 837-853.","DOI":"10.1137\/060658679"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"S. E. Asch.Opinions and social pressure, <i>Scientific American<\/i>, <b>193<\/b> (1955), 31-35.","DOI":"10.1038\/scientificamerican1155-31"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-4","unstructured":"R. B. Ash, <i>Real Analysis and Probability<\/i>, Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Academic Press, New York-London, 1972."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-5","unstructured":"P. Balenzuela, J. P. Pinasco and V. Semeshenko, The undecided have the key: Interaction driven opinion dynamics in a three state model, <i>PLoS ONE<\/i>, <b>10<\/b> (2016), e0139572, 1\u201321."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"B. O. Baumgaertner, R. C. Tyson, S. M. Krone.Opinion strength influences the spatial dynamics of opinion formation, <i>The Journal of Mathematical Sociology<\/i>, <b>40<\/b> (2016), 207-218.","DOI":"10.1080\/0022250X.2016.1205049"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. O. Baumgaertner, P. A. Fetros, R. C. Tyson and S. M. Krone, Spatial Opinion Dynamics and the Efects of Two Types of Mixing, <i>Phys Rev E.<\/i>, <b>98<\/b> (2018), 022310.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.98.022310"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-8","unstructured":"N. Bellomo, <i>Modeling Complex Living Systems A Kinetic Theory and Stochastic Game Approach<\/i>, Birkhauser, 2008."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"N. Bellomo, G. Ajmone Marsan and A. Tosin, <i>Complex Systems and Society. Modeling and Simulation<\/i>, SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, 2013.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-7242-1"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-10","unstructured":"K. C. Border and C. D. Aliprantis, <i>Infinite Dimensional Analysis - A Hitchhiker's Guide<\/i>, 3rd Edition, Springer, 2006."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"E. Burnstein, A. Vinokur.What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanation of choice shifts, <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology<\/i>, <b>11<\/b> (1975), 412-426.","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1031(75)90045-1"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J. A. Ca\u00f1izo, J. A. Carrillo, J. Rosado.A well-posedness theory in measures for some kinetic models of collective motion, <i>Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences<\/i>, <b>21<\/b> (2011), 515-539.","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218202511005131"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-13","unstructured":"R. B. Cialdini and M. R. Trost, Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance, <i>The Handbook of Social Psychology<\/i>, McGraw-Hill, (1998), 151\u2013192."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"F. Cucker, S. Smale.Emergent behavior in flocks, <i>IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control<\/i>, <b>52<\/b> (2007), 852-862.","DOI":"10.1109\/TAC.2007.895842"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch.Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, <i>Advances in Complex Systems<\/i>, <b>3<\/b> (2000), 87-98.","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219525900000078"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"P. Embrechts, M. Hofert.A note on generalized inverse, <i>Mathematical Methods of Operations Research<\/i>, <b>77<\/b> (2013), 423-432.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00186-013-0436-7"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"N. E. Friedkin, E. C. Johnsen.Social influence and opinions, <i>Journal of Mathematical Sociology<\/i>, <b>15<\/b> (1990), 193-206.","DOI":"10.1080\/0022250X.1990.9990069"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-18","unstructured":"T. Fujimoto.A simple model of consensus formation, <i>Okayama Economic Review<\/i>, <b>31<\/b> (1999), 95-100."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"S. Galam, <i>Sociophysics: A Physicist's Modeling of Psycho-Political Phenomena, <\/i>, Springer Science &amp; Business Media, 2012.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-2032-3"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-20","unstructured":"R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: Models, analysis and simulation, <i>Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation<\/i>, <b>5<\/b> (2002)."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"R. A. Holley, T. M. Liggett.Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model, <i>The Annals of Probability<\/i>, <b>3<\/b> (1975), 643-663.","DOI":"10.1214\/aop\/1176996306"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"C. La Rocca, L. A. Braunstein and F. V\u00e1zquez, The influence of persuasion in opinion formation and polarization, <i>Europhys. Letters<\/i>, <b>106<\/b> (2014), 40004.","DOI":"10.1209\/0295-5075\/106\/40004"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. Latan\u00e9.The psychology of social impact, <i>American Psychologist<\/i>, <b>36<\/b> (1981), 343-356.","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.36.4.343"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J. Lorenz.Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, <i>International Journal of Modern Physics C<\/i>, <b>18<\/b> (2007), 1819-1838.","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183107011789"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. M\u00e4s and A. Flache, Differentiation without distancing. Explaining bi-polarization of opinions without negative influence, <i>PloS one<\/i>, <b>8<\/b> (2013), e74516.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0074516"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"P. Milgrom, I. Segal.Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets, <i>Econometrica<\/i>, <b>70<\/b> (2002), 583-601.","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00296"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"R. Ochrombel.Simulation of Sznajd sociophysics model with convincing single opinions, <i>International Journal of Modern Physics C<\/i>, <b>12<\/b> (2001), 1091-1092.","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183101002346"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-28","unstructured":"L. Pareschi, G. Toscani., <i>Interacting Multiagent Systems: Kinetic Equations and Monte Carlo Methods<\/i>, <b>${ref.volume}<\/b> (2014)."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"L. Pedraza, J. P. Pinasco, N. Saintier.Measure-valued opinion dynamics, <i>M3AS: Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences<\/i>, <b>30<\/b> (2020), 225-260.","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218202520500062"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"M. P\u00e9rez-Llanos, J. P. Pinasco and N. Saintier, Opinion attractiveness and its effect in opinion formation models, <i>Phys. A<\/i>, <b>559<\/b> (2020), 125017, 9 pp.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2020.125017"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"M. P\u0155ez-Llanos, J. P. Pinasco, N. Saintier, A. Silva.Opinion formation models with heterogeneous persuasion and zealotry, <i>SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis<\/i>, <b>50<\/b> (2018), 4812-4837.","DOI":"10.1137\/17M1152784"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F. Vazquez, N. Saintier and J. P. Pinasco, The role of voting intention in public opinion polarization, <i>Phys. Rev. E<\/i>, <b>101<\/b> (2020), 012101, 13pp.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.101.012101"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"N. Saintier, J. P. Pinasco and F. Vazquez, A model for a phase transition between political mono-polarization and bi-polarization, <i>Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science<\/i>, <b>30<\/b> (2020), 063146, 17 pp.","DOI":"10.1063\/5.0004996"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J. P. Pinasco, V. Semeshenko, P. Balenzuela.Modeling opinion dynamics: Theoretical analysis and continuous approximation, <i>Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals<\/i>, <b>98<\/b> (2017), 210-215.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chaos.2017.03.033"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"F. Slanina and H. Lavicka, Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion formation, <i>The European Physical Journal B<\/i>, <b>35<\/b> (2003) 279\u2013288.","DOI":"10.1140\/epjb\/e2003-00278-0"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-36","unstructured":"D. W. Stroock., <i>Probability Theory, An Analytic View<\/i>, <b>${ref.volume}<\/b> (1993)."},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd.Opinion evolution in closed community, <i>International Journal of Modern Physics - C<\/i>, <b>11<\/b> (2000), 1157-1165.","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183100000936"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"G. Toscani.Kinetic models of opinion formation, <i>Communications in Mathematical Sciences<\/i>, <b>4<\/b> (2006), 481-496.","DOI":"10.4310\/CMS.2006.v4.n3.a1"},{"key":"key-10.3934\/nhm.2021006-39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"C. Villani, Topics in optimal transportation, <i>Grad.Studies in Math.<\/i>, American Mathematical Soc., (2003).","DOI":"10.1090\/gsm\/058"}],"container-title":["Networks &amp; Heterogeneous Media"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/aimsciences.org\/\/article\/doi\/10.3934\/nhm.2021006?viewType=html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,6]],"date-time":"2022-04-06T11:51:03Z","timestamp":1649245863000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.aimsciences.org\/article\/doi\/10.3934\/nhm.2021006"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"alternative-id":["1556-1801_2021_2_257"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3934\/nhm.2021006","relation":{},"ISSN":["1556-181X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1556-181X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}}}