{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T03:11:42Z","timestamp":1774926702398,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"AVES YAYINCILIK A.\u015e.","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AOTT"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Abstract\n\nObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Endobutton post-fixation and femoral (TransFix) transfixation in ACL reconstruction on lower extremity muscle strength, joint position sense, and knee stability. \\r\\nMethods: Subjects who had undergone ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon using Endobutton post-fixation (n=20, mean age: 26.5 years) or femoral transfixation (n=20, mean age: 29.9 years) were recruited to an ACL rehabilitation program. Twelve months after surgery, quadriceps and hamstring torque values were recorded using an isokinetic dynamometer. Computerized coordination and proprioception tests (Functional Squat System; Monitored Rehab System) were performed to determine the deficits in joint position sense. The anterior translation test was performed using a Kneelax 3 arthrometer to determine knee laxity. \\r\\nResults: Side-to-side differences between groups for hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength, concentric and eccentric motor coordination and anterior tibial laxity were not significantly different (p&gt;0.05). \\r\\nConclusion: No statistically significant differences in functional outcome were found 1 year after the ACL reconstruction using Endobutton post-fixation and femoral transfixation with hamstring tendon graft. Deficits in hamstring-quadriceps muscle strength, motor coordination and proprioception were still found in both groups. We therefore recommend that long-term follow-up and rehabilitation including neuromuscular exercises should be continued for longer than one year after ACL reconstruction.\n\n\u00d6zet\n\nAma\u00e7: \u00c7al\u0131\u015fmam\u0131zda Endobutton postfiksasyon ve femoral transfiksasyon y\u00f6ntemleri kullan\u0131larak \u00f6n \u00e7apraz ba\u011f (\u00d6\u00c7B) rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu yap\u0131lan ki\u015filerin, alt ekstremite kas kuvveti, eklem pozisyon hissi ve diz stabilitesi sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lad\u0131k. \\r\\n\u00c7al\u0131\u015fma plan\u0131: Hamstring tendon grefti kullan\u0131larak Endobutton postfiksasyon (n=20; ortalama ya\u015f: 26.5) ve femoral transfiksasyon (n=20; ortalama ya\u015f: 29.9) y\u00f6ntemleri ile ameliyat edilmi\u015f bireyler klinik \u00d6\u00c7B rehabilitasyon program\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131. Ameliyat sonras\u0131 12. ayda izokinetik dinamometre ile kas testi yap\u0131larak, kuadriseps ve hamstring kas kuvvetleri de\u011ferlendirildi. Diz eklemi pozisyon hissi kay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131 belirlemek i\u00e7in bilgisayarl\u0131 koordinasyon ve propriosepsiyon testleri (Functional Squat System; Monitored Rehab System) yap\u0131ld\u0131. Diz laksitesini belirlemek i\u00e7in \u00f6n \u00e7ekmece testi, Kneelax 3 artrometre kullan\u0131larak yap\u0131ld\u0131. \\r\\nBulgular: \u0130ki grup aras\u0131nda hamstring ve kuadriseps kas kuvvetleri, konsantrik ve egzantrik motor koordinasyon ve \u00f6n tibial laksite parametrelerinde istatistiksel a\u00e7\u0131dan anlaml\u0131 bir fark bulunmad\u0131 (p&gt;0.05). \\r\\n\u00c7\u0131kar\u0131mlar: \u00c7al\u0131\u015fmam\u0131z femoral transfiksasyon ve Endobutton postfiksasyon cerrahi tekni\u011fi ile \u00d6\u00c7B rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu yap\u0131lan bireylerin ameliyat sonras\u0131 1. y\u0131l itibar\u0131yla fonksiyonel sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 aras\u0131nda istatistiksel a\u00e7\u0131dan anlaml\u0131 bir fark olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Ancak her iki grupta da hamstring-kuadriseps kas kuvveti, motor koordinasyon ve propriosepsiyon yetersizli\u011fi devam etmektedir. Bu y\u00fczden n\u00f6romusk\u00fcler egzersizler i\u00e7eren rehabilitasyon program\u0131 ve takibin, cerrahi sonras\u0131 1 y\u0131ldan az s\u00fcrmeyecek \u015fekilde devam etmesini tavsiye etmekteyiz.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3944\/aott.2011.2402","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,4]],"date-time":"2011-10-04T20:43:49Z","timestamp":1317761029000},"page":"240-247","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Comparison of functional outcomes of two anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction methods with hamstring tendon graft"],"prefix":"10.5152","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Hayri","family":"Baran Yosmaoglu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gul","family":"Baltaci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Defne","family":"Kaya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hamza","family":"Ozer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ahmet","family":"Atay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"3111","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"container-title":["Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/aott.org.tr\/index.php\/pub\/article\/download\/2497\/2453","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,18]],"date-time":"2025-11-18T11:29:30Z","timestamp":1763465370000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aott.org.tr\/index.php\/pub\/article\/view\/2497"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,4]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3944\/aott.2011.2402","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-1294","1017-995X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-1294","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1017-995X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]}}}