{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]],"date-time":"2026-04-09T13:51:45Z","timestamp":1775742705816,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"AVES YAYINCILIK A.\u015e.","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AOTT"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Abstract\n\nObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of transtibial and transportal TransFix\u00ae methods in ACL reconstruction. \\r\\nMethods: One hundred and sixty-eight patients were randomized into either transtibial TransFix\u00ae (n=88) or transportal TransFix\u00ae (n=80) femoral fixation groups for hamstring ACL reconstruction. Patients were clinically evaluated through history and physical examination as well as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores and a rolimeter over an 18-month time frame. \\r\\nResults: According to the IKDC score, there were more normal knees in the transportal group than the transtibial group (37 vs. 25). Mean Lysholm score was 78.32\u00b110.7 in the transtibial group and 81.41\u00b18.2 in the transportal group (p=0.037). Mean rolimeter value was 2.2\u00b11.13 mm in the transtibial group and 1.73\u00b10.85 mm in the transportal group (p=0.002). At the final follow-up, 20 patients in the transtibial group and 10 in the transportal group had a Lachman test grade of 2 or 3. More intraoperative complications in terms of graft passage difficulties and posterior wall blow-up were seen in the transportal group.\\r\\nConclusion: Transportal TransFix\u00ae technique appears to produce better clinical results than the traditional transtibial technique.\n\n\u00d6zet\n\nAma\u00e7: Bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n amac\u0131 \u00d6\u00c7B rekonstr\u00fcksiyonunda transtibial ve transportal TransFix\u00ae metotlar\u0131n\u0131n klinik sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmakt\u0131.\\r\\n\u00c7al\u0131\u015fma plan\u0131: Hamstring \u00d6\u00c7B rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu i\u00e7in 168 hasta transtibial (n=88) ve transportal (n=80) TransFix\u00ae femoral tespit gruplar\u0131na ayr\u0131ld\u0131. Hastalar klinik ge\u00e7mi\u015f ve fiziksel muayenenin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Uluslararas\u0131 Diz Dok\u00fcmantasyon Komitesi (IKDC) ve Lysholm skorlamas\u0131 ile 18 ayl\u0131k bir zaman dilimi i\u00e7inde rolimetre ile de\u011ferlendirildi.\\r\\nBulgular: IKDC skorlamas\u0131na g\u00f6re transtibial gruba g\u00f6re (25) transportal grupta daha fazla (37) normal diz vard\u0131. Ortalama Lysholm skoru transtibial grupta 78.32\u00b110.7, transportal grupta 81.41\u00b18.2 idi (p=0.037). Ortalama rolimetre de\u011feri transtibial grupta 2.2\u00b11.13 mm, transportal grupta ise 1.73\u00b10.85 mm olarak kaydedildi (p=0.002). Son kontrolde, transtibial gruptan 20 hasta ve transportal gruptan 10 hastan\u0131n Lachman testinden 2 ya da 3 puan ald\u0131lar. Transportal grupta greft ge\u00e7i\u015f zorlu\u011fu ve posterior duvar\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan daha fazla intraoperatif komplikasyon g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. \\r\\n\u00c7\u0131kar\u0131mlar: Transportal TransFix\u00ae tekni\u011fi geleneksel transtibial tekni\u011fine g\u00f6re daha iyi klinik sonu\u00e7lar vermektedir.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3944\/aott.2012.2679","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,26]],"date-time":"2012-12-26T05:22:44Z","timestamp":1356499364000},"page":"361-366","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Comparison of short term clinical outcomes between transtibial and transportal TransFix\u00ae femoral fixation in hamstring ACL reconstruction"],"prefix":"10.5152","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"Fardin","family":"Mirzatolooei","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"3111","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"container-title":["Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/aott.org.tr\/index.php\/pub\/article\/download\/2645\/2600","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,18]],"date-time":"2025-11-18T11:26:10Z","timestamp":1763465170000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aott.org.tr\/index.php\/pub\/article\/view\/2645"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3944\/aott.2012.2679","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-1294","1017-995X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-1294","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1017-995X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]}}}