{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T19:03:35Z","timestamp":1773601415609,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"AVES YAYINCILIK A.\u015e.","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AOTT"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Abstract\n\nObjective: The aim of this study is to report our institution\u2019s experience regarding the use of open tibial inlay technique in patients undergoing single-stage combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.\nMethods: Records of 17 patients who underwent PCL reconstruction with tibial inlay technique were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with ipsilateral femoral or tibial osteochondral avulsion fractures or ipsilateral concomitant tibia and femur shaft fractures were excluded. Out of these 17 patients, six cases underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) + PCL reconstruction, nine cases underwent ACL+ PCL + posterolateral corner reconstruction, one case underwent ACL + PCL + MCL reconstruction and one case underwent ACL+ PCL + posterolateral corner + MCL reconstruction. Mean follow-up was 14.27\u00b16.77 (range: 6\u201330) months.\nResults: In preoperative assessments, all patients had 3+ posterior laxity in posterior drawer test; at final follow-up, 6 patients had 0 laxity, 7 patients had 1+ laxity, and 4 patients had 2+ laxity (p&lt;0.001). International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective evaluation showed severe disability in all patients preoperatively, whereas 5 knees were grade A, 8 knees were grade B, 3 knees were grade C, and 1 knee was grade D at final follow-up. Mean IKDC subjective score was 75.22\u00b17.53 at final follow-up. Postoperatively, mean side-to-side difference in KT-1000 arthrometer measurement was 2.45\u00b11.80 mm. At final follow-up, mean range of motion (ROM) was 0\u00ba on extension and 123.56\u00b16.31\u00ba on flexion.\nConclusion: Open tibial inlay approach is beneficial during PCL reconstruction. Further study is warranted to establish its effectiveness on functional outcomes and prevention of complications.\n \n\nDOI: 10.3944\/AOTT.2015.14.0443\n \n\n \n\n\u00d6zet\n\nAma\u00e7: A\u00e7\u0131k tibiyal inley tekni\u011fi ile izole ya da tek a\u015famal\u0131 kombine arka \u00e7apraz ba\u011f rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu uygulanan hastalarda klinik deneyimlerimizi sunmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lad\u0131k.\u00c7al\u0131\u015fma plan\u0131: Tibiyal inley tekni\u011fi ile A\u00c7B rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu uygulanan 17 hastan\u0131n kay\u0131tlar\u0131 retrospektif olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Tek tarafl\u0131 femoral ya da tibial osteokondral kopma k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da tek tarafl\u0131 e\u015fzamanl\u0131 tibia ve femur \u015faft k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan hastalar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ki hastada izole arka \u00e7apraz ba\u011f rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilirken, 10\/17 hastada posterolateral k\u00f6\u015fe rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu, 14\/17 hastada \u00f6n \u00e7apraz ba\u011f rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu ve 2\/17 hastada mediyal kollateral ba\u011f rekonstr\u00fcksiyonu ile birlikte yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcm hastalar ortalama 14.27\u00b16.77 (6\u201330) ay s\u00fcreyle izlenmi\u015ftir.Bulgular: Cerrahi \u00f6ncesi de\u011ferlendirmelerde t\u00fcm hastalarda arka \u00e7ekmece testinde arkaya gev\u015feklik 3 + iken son takipler s\u0131ras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmelerde arka \u00e7ekmece testi skoru 6 hastada 0 gev\u015feklik, 7 hastada + 1 gev\u015feklik ve 4 hastada + 2 gev\u015feklik olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir (p&lt;0.001). IKDC objektif de\u011ferlendirmesi, preoperatif d\u00f6nemde t\u00fcm hastalarda ciddi i\u015flev kayb\u0131 g\u00f6stermekle beraber, son takip de\u011ferlendirmelerde 5 dizin A d\u00fczeyde, 8 dizin B d\u00fczeyde, 3 dizin C d\u00fczeyde ve 1 dizin ise D d\u00fczeyde oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Ortalama IKDC subjektif skoru izlemlerde 75.22\u00b17.53 olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Postoperatif d\u00f6nemde, KT-1000 artrometresindeki ortalama iki taraf fark\u0131 2.45\u00b11.80 mm olarak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Son izlemde ortalama ROM ekstansiyonda 0 derece ve fleksiyonda 123.56\u00b16.31 olarak saptanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u00c7\u0131kar\u0131mlar: A\u00e7\u0131k tibiyal inley yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 arka \u00e7apraz ba\u011f rekonkstr\u00fcksiyonunda yararl\u0131d\u0131r. Fonksiyonel sonu\u00e7lar \u00fczerindeki etkinli\u011fini ve komplikasyonlara kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fini belirlemek i\u00e7in yeni \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ihtiya\u00e7 vard\u0131r<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3944\/aott.2015.14.0443","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,25]],"date-time":"2015-06-25T09:33:48Z","timestamp":1435224828000},"page":"579-585","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via  tibial inlay technique in multiligament  knee injuries"],"prefix":"10.5152","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Sinan","family":"Zehir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nurzat","family":"Elmal\u0131","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ercan","family":"\u015eahin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Murat","family":"\u00c7alb\u0131y\u0131k","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mustafa","family":"Karakaplan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zeki","family":"Ta\u015fdemir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"3111","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"container-title":["Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/aott.org.tr\/index.php\/pub\/article\/download\/3053\/3005","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,18]],"date-time":"2025-11-18T11:08:03Z","timestamp":1763464083000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aott.org.tr\/index.php\/pub\/article\/view\/3053"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3944\/aott.2015.14.0443","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-1294","1017-995X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-1294","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1017-995X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]}}}