{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,18]],"date-time":"2026-07-18T15:27:46Z","timestamp":1784388466330,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Dent. Mater. J.","Dental Materials Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,25]]},"DOI":"10.4012\/dmj.2024-252","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,20]],"date-time":"2024-12-20T22:12:01Z","timestamp":1734732721000},"page":"112-120","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Evaluation with finite element analysis of a ball attachment overdenture prosthesis of a patient"],"prefix":"10.4012","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Hatice","family":"\u00d6ZDEM\u0130R","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Atat\u00fcrk University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Burak","family":"H\u00dcLAG\u00dc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Atat\u00fcrk University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2427","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1) Arat Bilhan S, Baykasoglu C, Bilhan H, Kutay O, Mugan A. Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: A computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis. J Biomech 2015; 48: 130-137.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2014.10.022"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2) Cicci\u00f9 M, Cervino G, Bramanti E, Lauritano F, Lo Gudice G, Scappaticci L, <i>et al.<\/i> FEM Analysis of mandibular prosthetic overdenture supported by dental implants: Evaluation of different retention methods. Comput Math Methods Med 2015; 2015: 943839.","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/943839"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3) Liu J, Pan S, Dong J, Mo Z, Fan Y, Feng H. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained supported overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent 2013; 41: 241-249.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2012.11.008"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4) Unsal GS, Erbasar GNH, Aykent F, Ozyilmaz OY, Ozdogan MS. Evaluation of stress distribution on mandibular \u0131mplant-supported overdentures with different bone heights and attachment types: A 3D finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2019; 45: 363-370.","DOI":"10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-19-00076"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5) Zhang L, Lyu C, Shang Z, Niu A, Liang X. Quality of life of implant-supported overdenture and conventional complete denture in restoring the edentulous mandible: A systematic review. Implant Dent 2017; 26: 945-950.","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0000000000000668"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6) Cardoso RG, Melo LA, Barbosa GA, Calderon PD, Germano AR, Mestriner W Jr, <i>et al.<\/i> Impact of mandibular conventional denture and overdenture on quality of life and masticatory efficiency. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30: e102.","DOI":"10.1590\/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0102"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7) Nogueira TE, Dias DR, Leles CR. Mandibular complete denture versus single-implant overdenture: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes. J Oral Rehabil 2017; 44: 1004-1016.","DOI":"10.1111\/joor.12550"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8) Sivaramakrishnan G, Sridharan K. Comparison of implant supported mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Aust Dent J 2016; 61: 482-488.","DOI":"10.1111\/adj.12416"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9) Fanuscu MI, Caputo AA. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture. J Prosthodont 2004; 13: 214-220.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-849X.2004.04041.x"},{"key":"10","unstructured":"10) Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. <i>In vitro<\/i> study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: Comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 128-134."},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11) El-Zawahry MM, Ibraheem EM, Nassani MZ, Ghorab SA, El-Anwar MI. Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdentures retained with one, two, or four ball attachments: A finite element study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2018; 15: 437-443.","DOI":"10.4103\/1735-3327.245234"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12) Ozan O, Ramoglu S. Effect of implant height differences on different attachment types and peri-implant bone in mandibular two-implant overdentures: 3D finite element study. J Oral Implantol 2015; 41: e50-e59.","DOI":"10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-13-00239"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"13) Kim HY, Lee JY, Shin SW, Bryant SR. Attachment systems for mandibular implant overdentures: A systematic review. J Adv Prosthodont 2012; 4: 197-203.","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2012.4.4.197"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14) Goncalves F, Campestrini VLL, Rigo-Rodrigues MA, Zanardi MR. Effect of the attachment system on the biomechanical and clinical performance of overdentures: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123: 589-594.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.03.024"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15) Boven GC, Meijer HJ, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Maxillary implant overdentures retained by use of bars or locator attachments: 1-year findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 64: 26-33.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.04.013"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16) Chaware SH, Thakkar ST. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the attachments used in implant-supported overdentures. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020; 20: 255-268.","DOI":"10.4103\/jips.jips_368_19"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17) Sadowsky SJ. Occlusal overload with dental implants: A review. Int J Implant Dent 2019; 5: 29.","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-019-0180-8"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18) Mohamed AMA, Askar MG, El Homossany MEB. Stresses induced by one piece and two piece dental implants in All-on-4<sup>\u00ae<\/sup> implant supported prosthesis under simulated lateral occlusal loading: Non linear finite element analysis study. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22: 196.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-022-02228-9"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19) Onone Gialain I, Folmer Rodrigues da Silva L, Kasumi Gantier Takano M, Yag\u00fce Ballester R, Guimar\u00e3es Roscoe M, Barbosa Cruz Meira J. Peri-implant bone resorption risk of anterior maxilla narrow single implants: A finite-element analysis. Biomater Investig Dent 2022; 9: 92-100.","DOI":"10.1080\/26415275.2022.2135516"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"20) Lee JS, Lim YJ. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stress induced by different lengths of osseointegrated implants in the anterior maxilla. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2013; 16: 1143-1149.","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2012.654780"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21) Bhattacharjee B, Saneja R, Singh A, Dubey PK, Bhatnagar A.Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis \u2014A systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2022; 12: 802-808.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jobcr.2022.09.002"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22) Dong J, Zhang FY, Wu GH, Zhang W, Yin J. Measurement of mucosal thickness in denture-bearing area of edentulous mandible. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015; 128: 342-347.","DOI":"10.4103\/0366-6999.150100"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"23) Hu F, Gong Y, Bian Z, Zhang X, Xu B, Zhang J, <i>et al.<\/i> Comparison of three different types of two-implant-supported magnetic attachments on the stress distribution in edentulous mandible. Comput Math Methods Med 2019; 2019: 1-10.","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/6839517"},{"key":"24","unstructured":"24) Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: A finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: e69-76."},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"25) Frost HM. Bone\u2019s mechanostat: A 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003; 275: 1081-1101.","DOI":"10.1002\/ar.a.10119"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"26) Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585-598.","DOI":"10.1067\/mpr.2001.115251"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"27) Willie BM, Zimmermann EA, Vitienes I, Main RP, Komarova SV. Bone adaptation: Safety factors and load predictability in shaping skeletal form. Bone 2020; 131: 115114.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bone.2019.115114"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"28) Frost HM. Bone \u201cmass\u201d and the \u201cmechanostat\u201d: A proposal. Anat Rec 1987; 219: 1-9.","DOI":"10.1002\/ar.1092190104"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"29) Lin D, Li Q, Li W, Swain M. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009; 2: 410-432.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2008.11.007"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30) Zupancic Cepic L, Frank M, Reisinger A, Pahr D, Zechner W, Schedle A. Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD\/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible. Int J Implant Dent 2022; 8: 8.","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-022-00404-8"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"31) Kasani R, Rama Sai Attili BK, Dommeti VK, Merdji A, Biswas JK, Roy S. Stress distribution of overdenture using odd number implants \u2014A finite element study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 98: 369-382.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2019.06.030"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"32) Khurana N, Rodrigues S, Shenoy S, Saldanha S, Pai U, Shetty T, <i>et al.<\/i> A comparative evaluation of stress distribution with two attachment systems of varying heights in a mandibular \u0131mplant-supported overdenture: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: e795-e805.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12966"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"33) Haruta A, Matsushita Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sawae Y, Sakai N, Koyano K. Effects of mucosal thickness on the stress distribution and denture stability of mandibular implant-supported overdentures with unsplinted attachments <i>in vitro<\/i>. J Dent Biomech 2011; 2011: 894395.","DOI":"10.4061\/2011\/894395"}],"container-title":["Dental Materials Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/dmj\/44\/1\/44_2024-252\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T04:41:04Z","timestamp":1738384864000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/dmj\/44\/1\/44_2024-252\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,25]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4012\/dmj.2024-252","relation":{},"ISSN":["0287-4547","1881-1361"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0287-4547","type":"print"},{"value":"1881-1361","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,25]]},"article-number":"2024-252"}}