{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,9]],"date-time":"2026-05-09T09:47:38Z","timestamp":1778320058040,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Dent. Mater. J.","Dental Materials Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,25]]},"DOI":"10.4012\/dmj.2025-150","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,3]],"date-time":"2025-12-03T22:06:46Z","timestamp":1764799606000},"page":"38-46","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane ether and other impression materials in full-arch implant rehabilitation with varying angulations: A comparative &lt;i&gt;in vitro&lt;\/i&gt; study"],"prefix":"10.4012","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Akanay","family":"COPUROGLU","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul Galata University School of Dentistry"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zeynep","family":"OZKURT-KAYAHAN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University School of Dentistry"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ender","family":"KAZAZOGLU","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University School of Dentistry"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"2427","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1) Sailer I, Karasan D, Todorovic A, Ligoutsikou M, Pjetursson BE. Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy. Periodontol 2000 2022; 88: 130-144.","DOI":"10.1111\/prd.12416"},{"key":"2","unstructured":"2) Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, Lyons K, Swain M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prosthesis: A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 506-515."},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3) Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen Y-W, Kotina E, Natto Z, Kang K, <i>et al<\/i>. Digital vs conventional implant impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont 2020; 29: 660-678.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13211"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4) Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 343-352.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.10.029"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5) Rubel BS. Impression materials: A comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 629-642.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cden.2007.03.006"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6) Enkling N, Bayer S, J\u00f6hren P, Mericske-Stern R. Vinylsiloxanether: A new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 14: 144-151.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2009.00240.x"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7) Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsky E, Mangano C. Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0163107.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0163107"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8) Gim\u00e9nez B, \u00d6zcan M, Mart\u00ednez-Rus F, Prad\u00edes G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(Suppl 1): e54-64.","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12124"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9) G\u00fcth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1201-1208.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-012-0795-0"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10) Park JS, Alshehri YFA, Kruger E, Villata L. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions in partially dentate patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2025; 160: 105918.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2025.105918"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11) Chen Y, Zhai Z, Watanabe S, Nakano T, Ishigaki S. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners. J Dent 2022; 124: 104220.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104220"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12) Siqueira R, Galli M, Chen Z, Mendon\u00e7a G, Meirelles L, Wang HL, <i>et al<\/i>. Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25: 6517-6531.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-021-04157-3"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"13) Takaba M, Tanaka S, Ishiura Y, Baba K. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD\/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework. J Prosthodont 2013; 22: 402-407.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12001"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14) Marghalani A, Weber HP, Finkelman M, Kudara Y, El Rafie K, Papaspyridakos P. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 574-579.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.07.002"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15) Cao R, Zhang S, Li L, Qiu P, Xu H, Cao Y. Accuracy of intraoral scanning versus conventional impressions for partial edentulous patients with maxillary defects. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 16773.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-44033-6"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16) Waldecker M, Rues S, Awounvo Awounvo JS, Rammelsberg P, B\u00f6micke W. In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26: 6491-6502.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-022-04598-4"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17) Revilla-Le\u00f3n M, Lanis A, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Gallucci GO. Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy. J Prosthodont 2023; 32(S2): 150-164.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13749"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18) Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Gallucci GO, Doukoudakis A, Weber HP, Chronopoulos V. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 836-845.","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3625"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19) Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O, Ozcelik TB, Yagiz A. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants. J Dent 2014; 42: 1551-1559.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2014.10.008"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"20) Albayrak B, Sukotjo C, Wee AG, Korkmaz \u0130H, Bay\u0131nd\u0131r F. Three-dimensional accuracy of conventional versus digital complete arch implant impressions. J Prosthodont 2021; 30: 163-170.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13264"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21) Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 648-653.","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12853"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22) Revised American Dental Association Specification No. 19 for Non-Aqueous, Elastomeric Dental Impression Materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 94: 733-741.","DOI":"10.14219\/jada.archive.1977.0334"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"23) Pesce P, Nicolini P, Caponio VCA, Zecca PA, Canullo L, Isola G, <i>et al<\/i>. Accuracy of full-arch intraoral scans versus conventional impression: A systematic review with a meta-analysis and a proposal to standardise the analysis of the accuracy. J Clin Med 2024; 14: 71.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14010071"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"24) Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Finkelman M, Sicilia E, Gotsis S, Chen YW, <i>et al<\/i>. Digital vs conventional full-arch implant impressions: A retrospective analysis of 36 edentulous jaws. J Prosthodont 2023; 32: 325-330.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13536"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"25) Siadat H, Saeidi Z, Alikhasi M, Zeighami S. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impression materials and trays on the accuracy of angulated implants impressions. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10: e1096-e1102.","DOI":"10.4317\/jced.55227"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"26) Baig MR, Buzayan MM, Yunus N. Accuracy of a new elastomeric impression material for complete-arch dental implant impressions. J Investig Clin Dent 2018; 9: e12320.","DOI":"10.1111\/jicd.12320"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"27) Vojdani M, Torabi K, Ansarifard E. Accuracy of different impression materials in parallel and nonparallel implants. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015; 12: 315.","DOI":"10.4103\/1735-3327.161429"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"28) Aidasani AN, Jain S, Hassan S, Sharma A, Shanthi C, Fere S. Comparative evaluation of the rigidity and accuracy of different elastomeric impression materials with open tray implant level impression technique\u2014An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2023; 15(Suppl 2): S1262-1265.","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_131_23"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"29) K\u0131ra\u00e7 FS. Is ethics approval necessary for all trials? A clear but not certain process. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2013; 22: 73-75.","DOI":"10.4274\/Mirt.80664"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30) Bano NZ, Shaukat A. Comparison of epoxy resin and rigid polyurethane foam as a bone substitute to study implant biomechanics. Cureus 2025; 17: e79124.","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.79124"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"31) Klinger S, Greinwald M, Augat P, Hollensteiner M. Mechanical and morphometric characterization of custom-made trabecular bone surrogates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2022; 129: 105146.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2022.105146"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"32) Comuzzi L, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Tumedei M. An in vitro evaluation, on polyurethane foam sheets, of the insertion torque (IT) values, pull-out torque values, and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) of nanoshort dental implants. Polymers (Basel) 2019; 11: 1020.","DOI":"10.3390\/polym11061020"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"33) Kang BH, Son K, Lee KB. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners and two laboratory scanners for a complete arch: A comparative in vitro study. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 2020; 10: 74.","DOI":"10.3390\/app10010074"},{"key":"34","unstructured":"34) 3Shape A\/S. TRIOS Module User Manual [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 18]. Available from: https:\/\/3shape.widen.net\/view\/pdf\/nnfgtwezbz\/TRIOS-Module-User-Manuals---R1.0-B-EN-US.pdf"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"35) Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Nasirpour A, Hasanzade M. Three-dimensional accuracy of digital impression versus conventional method: Effect of implant angulation and connection type. Int J Dent 2018; 2018: 3761750.","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/3761750"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"36) G\u00f3mez-Polo M, Sallorenzo A, Ortega R, G\u00f3mez-Polo C, Barmak AB, Att W, <i>et al<\/i>. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans. J Prosthet Dent 2024; 131: 119-127.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2021.11.018"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"37) G\u00f3mez-Polo M, Sallorenzo A, Cascos R, Ballesteros J, Barmak AB, Revilla-Le\u00f3n M. Conventional and digital complete-arch implant impression techniques: An in vitro study comparing accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 2024; 132: 809-818.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2022.08.028"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"38) Geramipanah F, Sadighpour L, Payaminia L. Investigation of the effects of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression using two intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Clin Exp Dent Res 2023; 9: 983-992.","DOI":"10.1002\/cre2.793"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"39) Moura RV, Kojima AN, Saraceni CHC, Bassolli L, Balducci I, \u00d6zcan M, <i>et al<\/i>. Evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital impression techniques for implant restorations. J Prosthodont 2018; 28: e530-e535.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12799"},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"40) Guo YQ, Ma Y, Cai SN, Yu H. Optimal impression materials for implant-supported fixed complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2025; 133: 1172-1182.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.06.024"},{"key":"41","unstructured":"41) Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: Effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 885-888."},{"key":"42","unstructured":"42) Chang WG, Vahidi F, Bae KH, Lim BS. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 44-47."},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"43) Barrett MG, de Rijk WG, Burgess JO. The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthodont 1993; 2: 75-82.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00387.x"},{"key":"44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"44) Aguilar ML, Elias A, Vizcarrondo CET, Psoter WJ. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 202-209.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(10)60032-7"},{"key":"45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"45) Rajendran R, Chander N, Anitha K, Muthukumar B. Dimensional accuracy of vinyl polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials in direct implant impression technique for multiple dental implants. Eur Oral Res 2021; 55: 54-59.","DOI":"10.26650\/eor.20210110"},{"key":"46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"46) Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: An in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12 Suppl 1; e63-e76.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x"},{"key":"47","unstructured":"47) Mpikos P, Kafantaris N, Tortopidis D, Galanis C, Kaisarlis G, Koidis P. The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of external- and internal-connection implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 1422-1428."},{"key":"48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"48) Mart\u00ednez-Rus F, Garc\u00eda C, Santamar\u00eda A, \u00d6zcan M, Prad\u00edes G. Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels. Implant Dent 2013; 22: 268-276.","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0b013e3182920dc5"},{"key":"49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"49) Chia V, Esguerra R, Teoh K, Teo J, Wong K, Tan K. In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions: The effect of implant angulation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32: 313-321.","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.5087"},{"key":"50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"50) Shim JS, Ryu JJ, Shin SW, Lee JY. Effects of implant angulation and impression coping type on the dimensional accuracy of impressions. Implant Dent 2015; 24: 726-729.","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0000000000000336"},{"key":"51","unstructured":"51) Rutkunas V, Sveikata K, Savickas R. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: A preliminary laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 512-515."}],"container-title":["Dental Materials Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/dmj\/45\/1\/45_2025-150\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,31]],"date-time":"2026-01-31T03:47:40Z","timestamp":1769831260000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/dmj\/45\/1\/45_2025-150\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,25]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4012\/dmj.2025-150","relation":{},"ISSN":["0287-4547","1881-1361"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0287-4547","type":"print"},{"value":"1881-1361","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,25]]},"article-number":"2025-150"}}