{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]],"date-time":"2026-06-10T16:49:12Z","timestamp":1781110152728,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":85,"publisher":"IGI Global Scientific Publishing","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]},"abstract":"<p>A new form of online citizen participation in government decisionmaking has arisen in the United States (U.S.) under the Obama Administration. \u201cCivic Participation 2.0\u201d attempts to use Web 2.0 information and communication technologies to enable wider civic participation in government policymaking, based on three pillars of open government: transparency, participation, and collaboration. Thus far, the Administration has modeled Civic Participation 2.0 almost exclusively on a universalist\/populist Web 2.0 philosophy of participation. In this model, content is created by users, who are enabled to shape the discussion and assess the value of contributions with little information or guidance from government decisionmakers. The authors suggest that this model often produces \u201cparticipation\u201d unsatisfactory to both government and citizens. The authors propose instead a model of Civic Participation 2.0 rooted in the theory and practice of democratic deliberation. In this model, the goal of civic participation is to reveal the conclusions people reach when they are informed about the issues and have the opportunity and motivation seriously to discuss them. Accordingly, the task of civic participation design is to provide the factual and policy information and the kinds of participation mechanisms that support and encourage this sort of participatory output. Based on the authors' experience with Regulation Room, an experimental online platform for broadening effective civic participation in rulemaking (the process federal agencies use to make new regulations), the authors offer specific suggestions for how designers can strike the balance between ease of engagement and quality of engagement \u2013 and so bring new voices into public policymaking processes through participatory outputs that government decisionmakers will value.<\/p>","DOI":"10.4018\/ijep.2014010102","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,25]],"date-time":"2014-07-25T15:13:34Z","timestamp":1406301214000},"page":"16-40","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Designing an Online Civic Engagement Platform"],"prefix":"10.4018","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Cynthia R.","family":"Farina","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"CeRI (Cornell eRulemaking Initiative), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dmitry","family":"Epstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CeRI (Cornell eRulemaking Initiative), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Josiah","family":"Heidt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CeRI (Cornell eRulemaking Initiative), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mary J.","family":"Newhart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CeRI (Cornell eRulemaking Initiative), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2432","reference":[{"key":"ijep.2014010102-0","first-page":"271","article-title":"The Dynamics of achievement--oriented activity","author":"J. W.Atkinson","year":"1974","journal-title":"Motivation and achievement"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-5991.2007.00005.x"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0003055404041425"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/2328.003.0005","article-title":"Which democracy and which technology?","author":"B.Barber","year":"2003","journal-title":"Democracy and new media"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2010.03.001"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9760.00061"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-6","unstructured":"Bonnemann, T. (2011, September 29). We the People: Adoption metrics at one week. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.intellitics.com\/blog\/2011\/09\/29\/we-the-people-adoption-metrics-at-one-week\/"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1531674.1531684"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-8","unstructured":"\u201cBuzz of the week: How the Open Government Dialogue got slimed\u201d. (2009). Federal Computer Week. Retrieved from http:\/\/fcw.com\/articles\/2009\/06\/08\/buzz-open-government-dialogue-birth-certificate.aspx"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10714421.2011.597235"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-11","first-page":"943","article-title":"Citizen participation in rulemaking: Past, present, and future.","volume":"55","author":"C.Coglianese","year":"2006","journal-title":"Duke Law Journal"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/7473.003.0009","article-title":"Weak democracy, strong information: The role of information technology in the rulemaking process","author":"C.Coglianese","year":"2007","journal-title":"Governance and information technology: From electronic government to information government"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-13","author":"E. S.Cohen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Broadband internet: Access, regulation and policy"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-14","first-page":"342","article-title":"Deliberation and democratic legitimacy","author":"J.Cohen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-15","author":"S.Coleman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1054972.1054975"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-17","first-page":"411","article-title":"Rethinking regulatory democracy.","volume":"57","author":"M.-F.Cu\u00e9llar","year":"2005","journal-title":"Administrative Law Review"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.32.5.554"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2151659"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-20","author":"J. D.Dryzek","year":"2000","journal-title":"Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.3233\/IP-2002-0002","article-title":"The moderator as an emerging democratic intermediary: The role of the moderator in Internet discussions about public issues.","volume":"7","author":"A.Edwards","year":"2002","journal-title":"Information Polity"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., & Huibers, T. (2011). Social media and political participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & H. de Bruijn (Eds.), Electronic participation (Vol. 6847, pp. 25\u201335). Springer Berlin \/ Heidelberg. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/yg70206q2p648001\/abstract\/","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-23333-3_3"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-23","article-title":"Not by technology alone: The \u201canalog\u201d aspects of online public engagement in rulemaking.","author":"D.Epstein","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"5","key":"ijep.2014010102-24","first-page":"1185","article-title":"Knowledge in the people: Rethinking \u201cvalue\u201d in public rulemaking participation.","volume":"47","author":"C. R.Farina","year":"2012","journal-title":"Wake Forest Law Review"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Farina, C. R., Heidt, J., & Newhart, M. J. (2012). Rulemaking vs. democracy: Judging and nudging participation that counts. Michigan Journal of Environmental and Administrative Law, 2(1).","DOI":"10.36640\/mjeal.2.1.rulemaking"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.58948\/2331-3528.1772","article-title":"Rulemaking in 140 characters or less: Social networking and public participation in rulemaking.","volume":"31","author":"C. R.Farina","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pace Law Review"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-27","first-page":"395","article-title":"Rulemaking 2.0.","volume":"65","author":"C. R.Farina","year":"2011","journal-title":"Miami Law Review"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-28","author":"J. S.Fishkin","year":"2009","journal-title":"When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1461444809357927"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-30","unstructured":"Fronstin, P. (2011). Public opinion on the future of employment-based health benefits: findings from the 2011 health confidence survey. EBRI Notes, 32, 2-7. Retrieved May 21, 2012, from http:\/\/www.ebri.org\/publications\/notes\/index.cfm?fa=notesDisp&content_id=4936"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781483329208"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gudowsky, N., & Bechtold, U. (2013). The role of information in public participation. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(1), Article 3.","DOI":"10.16997\/jdd.152"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hoffman, M. E. S. (2012). The political economy of TARP: A public opinion approach. Retrieved from http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1998384","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.1998384"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.59962\/9780774816793","author":"D. J.Kahane","year":"2010","journal-title":"Deliberative democracy in practice"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-36","author":"S.Kaner","year":"2007","journal-title":"Facilitator\u2019s guide to participatory decision-making"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-37","author":"L.Kearns","year":"2002","journal-title":"E-participation in local government"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-38","author":"C. M.Kerwin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klemp, N. J., & Forcehimes, A. T. (2010). From town-halls to wikis: Exploring Wikipedia\u2019s implications for deliberative democracy. Journal of Public Deliberation, 6(2), Article 4.","DOI":"10.16997\/jdd.108"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-40","author":"S.Krug","year":"2007","journal-title":"Don't make me think: A common sense approach to web usability"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/0022-3816.00033"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-5907.2008.00319.x"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1316624.1316655"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-44","author":"J. S.Lubbers","year":"2006","journal-title":"A guide to federal agency rulemaking"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0007123402000194"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-46","unstructured":"Marks, J. (2011, November 4). White house defends We the People petition responses. Nextgov. Retrieved from: http:\/\/www.nextgov.com\/defense\/2011\/11\/white-house-defends-we-the-people-petition-responses\/50072\/"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1083-6101.2007.00377.x"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-48","unstructured":"Moorman, J. (2011, October 29). \u201cWe the People\u201d petitions result in overwhelming inaction. Retrieved from http:\/\/173.203.89.221\/politics\/we-people-petitions-result-overwhelming-inaction\/10292011"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-49","unstructured":"Muhlberger, P., & Weber, L. (2005). Lessons from the virtual agora project: The effects of agency, identity, information, and deliberation on political knowledge. Journal of Public Deliberation, 1, Article 5."},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139164887"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-51","first-page":"21","article-title":"Unchat: Democratic solution for a wired world","author":"B. S.Noveck","year":"2004","journal-title":"Democracy online: The prospects for political renewal through the Internet"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-52","author":"B. S.Noveck","year":"2009","journal-title":"Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-53","unstructured":"Obama, B. (2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies, 74 Fed. Reg. 4685. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/the_press_office\/Memorandum-for-the-Heads-of-Executive-Departments-and-Agencies-3-9-09\/"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-54","unstructured":"Orszag, P. R. (2009, December 8). Open government directive. Memorandum M10-06."},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Park, J., Cardie, C., Klingel, S., Newhart, M. J., & Valbe, J. (2012, June 4\u20137). Facilitative moderation for online participation in erulemaking. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Digital Government Society, Baltimore, MD.","DOI":"10.1145\/2307729.2307757"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01449290110084683"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2003.10.015"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-58","first-page":"9","article-title":"When does deliberating improve decisionmaking?","volume":"15","author":"D. B.Rodriguez","year":"2006","journal-title":"Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1057\/9780230591080"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-60","unstructured":"Schilling, C. (2009, June 4). \u201cTransparent\u201d White House blacklists \u201cbirthers\u201d. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/2009\/06\/100035\/"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-61","author":"J.Short","year":"1976","journal-title":"The social psychology of telecommunications"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2202\/1944-2866.1010"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-63","unstructured":"Sifry, M. L. (2009, June 3). [Updated] OpenGovt Initiative brainstorm site asks for help voting down \u201ccounterproductive\u201d crowd. TechPresident. Retrieved from http:\/\/techpresident.com\/blog-entry\/updated-opengovt-initiative-brainstorm-site-asks-help-voting-down-counterproductive-crowd"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-64","first-page":"167","article-title":"Bridging the digital divide for e-government inclusion: A United States case study","author":"J. C.Sipior","year":"2012","journal-title":"Case studies in e-government"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-65","unstructured":"Somin, I. (2004, September 22). When ignorance isn\u2019t bliss: How political ignorance threatens democracy. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, 525, 1\u201327. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.cato.org\/pubs\/pas\/pa-525es.html"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-66","unstructured":"Spring Creek. (2009, June 23). Everything in moderation. Retrieved from http:\/\/springcreekgrp.com\/blog\/everything-moderation"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0095399704268503"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-68","unstructured":"Strother, R. (2009, May 28). White House comments on its open government directive. OMB Watch. Retrieved from: http:\/\/www.ombwatch.org\/node\/10050"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-69","unstructured":"Strother, R. (2009, June 3). Analysis of recommendations received through phase 1 of the Open Government Directive process. OMB Watch. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.ombwatch.org\/files\/NAPA.pdf"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-70","author":"C.Sunstein","year":"2001","journal-title":"Republic.com"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-71","unstructured":"\u201cThe rise of gov 2.0\u201d. (2009, August 18). OMB watch. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.ombwatch.org\/node\/10311"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-72","unstructured":"The White House. (n.d.). We the people: Your voice in our government. Retrieved from https:\/\/wwws.whitehouse.gov\/petitions"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-73","author":"P.Tiersma","year":"2000","journal-title":"Legal language"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-74","first-page":"1081","article-title":"The rocky road to legal reform: Improving the language of jury instructions.","volume":"6","author":"P.Tiersma","year":"2000","journal-title":"Brooklyn Law Review"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-75","unstructured":"Trudeau, L. (2009, June 1). Summary analysis of the open government brainstorm. National Academy of Public Administration. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/files\/documents\/ostp\/opengov_inbox\/NAPA_analysis.pdf"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11109-008-9079-4"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-77","unstructured":"TwinsforTruth. (2009, June 3). Msg 1. Retrieved from http:\/\/opengov.ideascale.com\/a\/dtd\/All-this-site-proves-is-the-truth-about-the-liberal-movement\/5379-4049"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-78","unstructured":"U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010, June 25). Open government plan 1.1. Retrieved from: http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/open\/EPAOpenGovernmentPlan_11.pdf"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-79","unstructured":"U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2010). Open NRC: Share your ideas. Retrieved from: https:\/\/opennrc.ideascale.com\/a\/panel.do"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-80","unstructured":"U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2010, October 22). IdeaScale final report. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.nrc.gov\/public-involve\/open\/ideascale-final-report.pdf"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02504682"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4159\/harvard.9780674865723"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-83","unstructured":"Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.pewinternet.org\/Reports\/2012\/Digital-differences.aspx"},{"key":"ijep.2014010102-84","unstructured":"Zuckerman, E. (2011, January 14). The first twitter revolution? Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.foreignpolicy.com\/articles\/2011\/01\/14\/the_first_twitter_revolution"}],"container-title":["International Journal of E-Politics"],"original-title":[],"language":"ng","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.igi-global.com\/viewtitle.aspx?TitleId=111189","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,31]],"date-time":"2024-05-31T07:39:46Z","timestamp":1717141186000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/services.igi-global.com\/resolvedoi\/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018\/ijep.2014010102"}},"subtitle":["Balancing \u201cMore\u201d vs. \u201cBetter\u201d Participation in Complex Public Policymaking"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]},"references-count":85,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/ijep.2014010102","relation":{},"ISSN":["1947-9131","1947-914X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1947-9131","type":"print"},{"value":"1947-914X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]}}}