{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,17]],"date-time":"2025-04-17T22:10:04Z","timestamp":1744927804780,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"IGI Global","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,1]]},"abstract":"<p>Processes concerning the diagnosis and treatment of patients cannot be straightjacketed into traditional production-like workflows. They can be best characterized as weakly-connected interacting light-weight workflows where tasks reside at different levels of granularity, and for each individual patient a doctor proceeds in a step-by-step way deciding what next steps be taken. Classical workflow notations fall short in supporting these patient processes as they have been designed to support monolithic processes. Classical notations (WF-nets (work flow nets), BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation), EPCs (Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled Substances), etc.) assume that a workflow process can be modeled by specifying the life-cycle of a single case in isolation. To address these problems, the authors present an extension of the Proclets framework which allows for dividing complex entangled processes into simple autonomous fragments. Additionally, increased emphasis is placed on interaction related aspects such that fragment instances for individual patients can cooperate in any desired way. The authors describe an implementation of the Proclets framework. Proclets have been added to the open-source Workflow Management System YAWL to better support inter-workflow support functionalities.<\/p>","DOI":"10.4018\/ijkbo.2012100101","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,22]],"date-time":"2012-10-22T16:14:54Z","timestamp":1350922494000},"page":"1-19","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Lightweight Interacting Patient Treatment Processes"],"prefix":"10.4018","volume":"2","author":[{"given":"Ronny","family":"Mans","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands"}]},{"given":"Wil","family":"van der Aalst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands"}]},{"given":"Nick","family":"Russell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Carba-Tec Pty. Ltd., Wakerley, QLD, Australia"}]},{"given":"Piet","family":"Bakker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Quality and Process Innovation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands"}]},{"given":"Arnold","family":"Moleman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of ADICT, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands"}]}],"member":"2432","reference":[{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-0","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barthelmess, P., & Wainer, J. (1995). Workflow systems: A few definitions and a few suggestions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Organizational Computing Systems (pp. 138-147). New York, NY: ACM.","DOI":"10.1145\/224019.224033"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1147\/sj.464.0703"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bhattacharya, K., Gerede, C., Hull, R., Liu, R., & Su, J. (2007). Towards formal analysis of artifact-centric business process models. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Process Management (LNCS 4714, pp. 288-304).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75183-0_21"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-3","unstructured":"Browne, E. D., Schrefl, M., & Warren, J. R. (2003). A two tier, goal-driven workflow model for the healthcare domain. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (pp. 32-39)."},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-4","unstructured":"Browne, E. D., Schrefl, M., & Warren, J. R. (2004). Activity crediting in distributed workflow environments. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems."},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Browne, E. D., Schrefl, M., & Warren, J. R. (2004). Goal-focused self-modifying workflow in the healthcare domain. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 197-210). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2004.1265370"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-6","unstructured":"Heinlein, C. (2000). Workflow and process synchronization with interaction expressions and graphs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany."},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-7","unstructured":"Heinlein, C. (2001). Workflow and process synchronization with interaction expressions and graphs. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Data Engineering (pp. 243-252). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society."},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heinlein, C. (2002). Synchronization of concurrent workflows using interaction expressions and coordination protocols. In R. Meersman & Z. Tari (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (LNCS 2519, pp. 54-71).","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-36124-3_4"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00fcnzle, V., & Reichert, M. (2009). Towards object-aware process management systems: Issues, challenges, benefits. In G. T. Halpin, J. Krogstie, S. Nurcan, E. Proper, R. Schmidt, P. Soffer, & R. Ukor (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (LNBIP 29, pp. 197-210).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-01862-6_17"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-10","unstructured":"Mans, R. S., Russell, N. C., van der Aalst, W. M. P., Moleman, A. J., & Bakker, P. J. M. (2010). Inter-workflow support (Tech. Rep. No. BPM-10-10). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: BPM Center."},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M\u00fcller, D., Reichert, M., & Herbst, J. (2007). Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In R. Meersman & Z. Tari (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference of On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (LNCS 4803, pp. 131-149).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-76848-7_10"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M\u00fcller, D., Reichert, M., & Herbst, J. (2008). A new paradigm for the enactment and dynamic adaptation of data-driven process structures. In Z. Bellahs\u00e8ne & M. L\u00e9onardi (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 5074, pp. 48-63).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-69534-9_4"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1147\/sj.423.0428"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Russell, N. C., & ter Hofstede, A. H. M. (2009). newYAWL: Towards Workflow 2.0. In K. Jensen & W. M. P. van der Aalst (Eds.), Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency (LNCS 5460, pp. 79-97).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-00899-3_5"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-15","unstructured":"Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W., & Schulz, K. (2005). When workflows will not deliver: The case of contradicting work practice. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Business Information Systems (pp. 69-84)."},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-03121-2"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0950-5849(99)00016-6"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van der Aalst, W. M. P., Barthelmess, P., Ellis, C. A., & Wainer, J. (2000). Workflow modeling using proclets. In O. Etzion & P. Scheuermann (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (LNCS 1901, pp. 198-209).","DOI":"10.1007\/10722620_20"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218843001000412"},{"issue":"3","key":"ijkbo.2012100101-20","first-page":"16","article-title":"Workflow support using proclets: Divide, interact, and conquer.","volume":"32","author":"W. M. P.van der Aalst","year":"2009","journal-title":"Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2004.02.002"},{"key":"ijkbo.2012100101-22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/7301.001.0001","author":"W. M. P.van der Aalst","year":"2002","journal-title":"Workflow management: Models, methods, and systems"},{"journal-title":"Business process management: Concepts, languages, architectures","year":"2007","author":"M.Weske","key":"ijkbo.2012100101-23"},{"journal-title":"Business process modeling notation (BPML), Version 1.0","year":"2004","author":"S. A.White","key":"ijkbo.2012100101-24"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations"],"original-title":[],"language":"ng","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.igi-global.com\/viewtitle.aspx?TitleId=72337","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,17]],"date-time":"2025-04-17T21:38:57Z","timestamp":1744925937000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/services.igi-global.com\/resolvedoi\/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018\/ijkbo.2012100101"}},"subtitle":[""],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,1]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/ijkbo.2012100101","relation":{},"ISSN":["2155-6393","2155-6407"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2155-6393"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2155-6407"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,1]]}}}