{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]],"date-time":"2026-06-10T16:18:06Z","timestamp":1781108286870,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"IGI Global Scientific Publishing","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7,1]]},"abstract":"<p>Organizational arrangements such as telework are often believed to disrupt workers\u2019 social networks. This raises a concern regarding teleworkers\u2019 abilities to adjust to technological changes in organizations. Based on innovation diffusion theory, this chapter considers telework and interdependence as parallel dimensions of social proximity that may be expected to affect the diffusion of innovation in terms of users\u2019 social information processing (i.e., their technology beliefs, communication channels, and information sources). This proposition is investigated in a field-study conducted during the migration of a business unit to a new communications system. Technology users at the business unit were surveyed three times over a 12-week period\u2014right before the conversion to the new system and at two six-week intervals following the conversion. These surveys assessed the impact of telework on respondents\u2019 beliefs toward the communication technology. Findings partially supported our hypotheses regarding the negative effect of remoteness on beliefs about technology. Users were then surveyed to investigate the media and sources they utilized to stay informed about the new technology. As anticipated, telework was related to an increased use of electronic media and of individual and authority information sources. Contrary to our expectations, though, results indicated a positive effect of telework on the use of collective sources and face-to-face media. Therefore, we conclude that teleworkers make a special effort to preserve their social networks.<\/p>","DOI":"10.4018\/jec.2005070103","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,15]],"date-time":"2011-02-15T13:44:55Z","timestamp":1297777495000},"page":"35-57","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Innovation Diffusion and E-Collaboration"],"prefix":"10.4018","volume":"1","author":[{"given":"Shaila M.","family":"Miranda","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oklahoma, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pamela E.","family":"Carter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Florida State University, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2432","container-title":["International Journal of e-Collaboration"],"original-title":[],"language":"ng","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.igi-global.com\/viewtitle.aspx?TitleId=1934","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T11:28:35Z","timestamp":1654082915000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/services.igi-global.com\/resolvedoi\/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018\/jec.2005070103"}},"subtitle":["The Effects of Social Proximity on Social Information Processing"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,7,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/jec.2005070103","relation":{},"ISSN":["1548-3673","1548-3681"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1548-3673","type":"print"},{"value":"1548-3681","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,7,1]]}}}