{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:28:05Z","timestamp":1786649285154,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) were studied in terms of analgesic efficacy, respiratory function and side effects after thoracic surgery for 24h. PCEA using fentanyl and bupivacaine as compared to IVPCA using morphine provides better pain relief both at rest and during coughing and is associated with fewer side effects.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare IVPCA and PCEA in terms of analgesic efficacy, respiratory function and side effects after thoracic surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Settings and Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Tertiary care teaching hospital. Prospective, randomized and open study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Thirty ASA-I or II patients undergoing thoracotomy were assigned randomly to receive either IVPCA using morphine or PCEA using fentanyl and bupivacaine combination postoperatively. No background infusion was administered in either group. Postoperative evaluation included pain intensity both at rest and during coughing, degree of sedation, arterial blood gas, forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), presence of side effects such as nausea\/vomiting and pruritis at 0, 2, 8, 12 and 24h. The primary outcome of the study was the percentage of patients with analgesia failure defined as VAS&gt;30 despite three consecutive PCA boluses requiring rescue analgesia with intravenous fentanyl.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Statistical Analysis:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Data were analyzed using\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test, \u03c7\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      test and Mann-Whitney test.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Significantly less number of patients required rescue analgesia in PCEA group (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;0.05). Pain relief was better both at rest and during coughing (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;0.05) in PCEA group as compared to IVPCA. Patients in the PCEA group were less sedated and had fewer incidences of side effects, i.e. nausea\/vomiting and pruritis. Postoperative FVC and PEFR were reduced significantly compared to baseline only in IVPCA group (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;0.05). Conclusion: After thoracic surgery, PCEA using fentanyl and bupivacaine as compared to IVPCA using morphine provides better pain relief both at rest and during coughing and associated with fewer side effects.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/0022-3859.40772","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,9]],"date-time":"2009-02-09T03:08:58Z","timestamp":1234148938000},"page":"86-90","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with fentanyl and bupivacaine provides better analgesia than intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia for early thoracotomy pain"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"54","author":[{"given":"BK","family":"Behera","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"GD","family":"Puri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B","family":"Ghai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-4975(02)04647-7","article-title":"Acute pain management for patients undergoing thoracotomy","volume":"75","author":"Soto","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"R2-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000266441.58308.42","article-title":"Lung function after lobectomy: A randomized, double-blinded trial comparing thoracic epidural ropivacaine-sufentanil and intravenous morphine for patient-controlled analgesia","volume":"105","author":"Bauer","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R3-8-20240205","first-page":"445","article-title":"Post-thoracotomy spirometric lung function: The effect of analgesia: A review","volume":"40","author":"Richardson","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Cardiovac Surg"},{"key":"R4-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8588(05)70443-3","article-title":"Preoperative and postoperative care of standard and high risk surgical patients","volume":"11","author":"Reilly","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hematol Oncol Clin North Am"},{"key":"R5-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1097\/00002508-199603000-00009","article-title":"Acute pain after thoracic surgery predicts long-term post-thoracotomy pain","volume":"12","author":"Katz","year":"1996","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"R6-8-20240205","first-page":"11","article-title":"The effects of three different analgesia techniques on long-term postthoracotomy pain","volume":"94","author":"Sent\u00fcrk","year":"2002","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R7-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2007.05.050","article-title":"Superior postoperative pain relief with thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair","volume":"134","author":"Weber","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"R8-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1830","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2005.11.048","article-title":"Operative mortality and respiratory complications after lung resection for cancer: Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and time trends","volume":"81","author":"Licker","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"R9-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2005.05.004","article-title":"Superiority of postoperative epidural over intravenous patient controlled analgesia in orthopedic oncologic patients","volume":"138","author":"Weinbroum","year":"2005","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"R10-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(02)00451-8","article-title":"Comparison of ropivacaine-fentanyl patient-controlled epidural analgesia with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for perioperative analgesia and recovery after open colon surgery","volume":"14","author":"Steinberg","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R11-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jvca.2004.03.013","article-title":"Analgesia after thoracotomy:epidural fentanyl-bupivacaine compared with intercostal nerve block plus intravenous morphine","volume":"18","author":"Concha","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth"},{"key":"R12-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200511000-00023","article-title":"Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids: A meta-analysis","volume":"103","author":"Wu","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R13-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0503300108","article-title":"The linearity of the visual analogue scale in patients with severe acute pain","volume":"33","author":"Myles","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"R14-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03009342","article-title":"Midazolam versus hydroxyzine as intramuscular premedicant","volume":"30","author":"Fragen","year":"1983","journal-title":"Can Anesth Soc J"},{"key":"R16-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03008779","article-title":"Patient-controlled lumbar epidural fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous fentanyl for post-thoracotomy pain","volume":"39","author":"Grant","year":"1992","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R18-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199203000-00007","article-title":"Effects of nighttime opioid infusion with PCA therapy on patient comfort and analgesic requirements after abdominal hysterectomy","volume":"76","author":"Parker","year":"1992","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R19-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1428","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000081793.60059.10","article-title":"The site of action of epidural Fentanyl in humans: The difference between infusion and bolus administration","volume":"97","author":"Ginosar","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R20-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1526-4637.2006.00174.x","article-title":"Regression of sensory and motor blockade, and analgesia during continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and fentanyl in comparison with other local anesthetics","volume":"8","author":"Kanai","year":"2007","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"R21-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-198406000-00006","article-title":"Comparison of intramuscular and epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia in grossly obese: Influence postoperative ambulation and pulmonary function","volume":"63","author":"Rawal","year":"1984","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R22-8-20240205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199803000-00032","article-title":"The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: Cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials","volume":"86","author":"Ballantyne","year":"1998","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Postgraduate Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00005257-200854020-00008","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T18:51:54Z","timestamp":1786647114000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00005257-200854020-00008"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0022-3859.40772","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3859"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3859","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008]]}}}