{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T20:32:13Z","timestamp":1786739533250,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We compared i-gel and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) regarding time taken for insertion, effective seal, fiberoptic view of larynx, ease of Ryle's tube insertion, and postoperative sore throat assessment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In a prospective, randomized manner, 48 adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II of either gender between 18 and 60 years presenting for a short surgical procedure were assigned to undergo surgery under general anesthesia on spontaneous ventilation using either the i-gel or PLMA. An experienced nonblinded anesthesiologist inserted appropriate sized i-gel or PLMA in patients using standard insertion technique and assessed the intraoperative findings of the study regarding regarding time taken for respective device insertion, effective seal, fiberoptic view of larynx, ease of Ryle's tube insertion, and postoperative sore throat assessment. Postoperative assessment of sore throat was done by blinded anesthesia resident.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The time required for insertion of i-gel was lesser (21.98 \u00b1 5.42 and 30.60 \u00b1 8.51 s in Group I and Group P, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.001). Numbers of attempts for successful insertions were comparable and in majority, device was inserted in first attempt. The mean airway leak pressures were comparable. However, there were more number of patients in Group P who had airway leak pressure &gt;20 cm H\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O. The fiberoptic view of glottis, ease of Ryle's tube insertion, and incidence of complications were comparable.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Time required for successful insertion of i-gel was less in adult patients undergoing short surgical procedure under general anesthesia on spontaneous ventilation. Patients with airway leak pressure &gt;20 cm H\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O were more in PLMA group which indicates its better suitability for controlled ventilation.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.130008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,4]],"date-time":"2014-04-04T03:46:08Z","timestamp":1396583168000},"page":"183-187","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Gurudas","family":"Kini","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gopalkrishna Mettinadka","family":"Devanna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Koteswara Rao","family":"Mukkapati","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Souvik","family":"Chaudhuri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Thomas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-200111000-00064","article-title":"Positive pressure ventilation with the Proseal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients","volume":"93","author":"Brimacombe","year":"2001","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R2-8-20260203","first-page":"770","article-title":"A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Proseal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation","volume":"95","author":"Brimacombe","year":"2002","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R3-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aei167","article-title":"Randomized crossover comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway with laryngeal tube sonda during anesthesia with controlled ventilation","volume":"95","author":"Cook","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R4-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000194300.56739.1a","article-title":"The size 1(1\/2) Proseal laryngeal mask airway in infants: A randomized, crossover investigation with the classic larynageal mask airway","volume":"102","author":"Goldmann","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R5-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aei234","article-title":"A randomized non crossover study comparing the proseal and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children","volume":"95","author":"Lopez-Gil","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R6-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1605","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000152640.25078.90","article-title":"A randomized crossover comparison the size 2.5 laryngeal mask airway Proseal versus laryngeal mask airway classic in pediatric patients","volume":"100","author":"Goldmann","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R7-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aei045","article-title":"Size 2 laryngeal mask airway: A randomized crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients","volume":"94","author":"Goldmann","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R8-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/74.2.123","article-title":"Total i.v. anesthesia with propofol and the laryngeal mask for orthopedic surgery","volume":"74","author":"Dyer","year":"1995","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R9-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199410000-00018","article-title":"Prospective comparison of use of the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube for ambulatory surgery","volume":"79","author":"Cork","year":"1994","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R10-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02179.x","article-title":"Resistance and additional inspiratory work imposed by the laryngeal mask airway. A comparison with tracheal tubes","volume":"47","author":"Bhatt","year":"1992","journal-title":"Anesthesia"},{"key":"R11-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/88.4.582","article-title":"Post operative sore throat after ambulatory surgery","volume":"88","author":"Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R12-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.resuscitation.2005.10.009","article-title":"European Resuscitation Council. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support","volume":"67","author":"Nolan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Resuscitation"},{"key":"R13-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.resuscitation.2006.10.026","article-title":"The i-GEL supraglottic airway: A potential role for resuscitation.?","volume":"73","author":"Gabott","year":"2007","journal-title":"Resuscitation"},{"key":"R14-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/84.5.650","article-title":"The LMA \u2018Proseal\u2019- a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent","volume":"84","author":"Brain","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R16-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2005.04258.x","article-title":"Initial anatomic investigation of I-gel airway: A novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff","volume":"60","author":"Levitan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R17-8-20260203","first-page":"302","article-title":"Comparison of clinical performance of I-GEL with LMA Proseal in elective surgeries","volume":"53","author":"Singh","year":"2009","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R18-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x","article-title":"Assessment of airway visualization: Validation of the percent of glottic opening (POGO) scale","volume":"5","author":"Levintan","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acad Emerg Med"},{"key":"R19-8-20260203","first-page":"600","article-title":"A comparison of the Proseal laryngeal mask and the laryngeal tube in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized patients","volume":"96","author":"Figueredo","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R20-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aep292","article-title":"Randomised crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetized, paralysed adults","volume":"103","author":"Uppal","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R21-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2008.05561.x","article-title":"Evaluation of the size 4 I-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients","volume":"63","author":"Gatward","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R22-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2008.05542.x","article-title":"I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients","volume":"63","author":"Wharton","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R23-8-20260203","first-page":"6","article-title":"Laryngeal mask airway and other supraglottic airway devices in paediatric practice","volume":"9","author":"Patel","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain"},{"key":"R24-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/0952-8180(95)00173-5","article-title":"Airway sealing pressures of the laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients","volume":"8","author":"Epstein","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R25-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1460-9592.2002.00815.x","article-title":"Higher airway seal does not imply adequate positioning of laryngeal mask airways in paediatric patients","volume":"12","author":"Inagawa","year":"2002","journal-title":"Paediatr Anaesth"},{"key":"R26-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2006.04745.x","article-title":"The anatomical position of three extraglotic airway devices in patients with clear airways","volume":"61","author":"van Zundert","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R27-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2005-870103","article-title":"The applicability of proseal laryngeal mask airway for laparotomies","volume":"40","author":"Borkowski","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther"},{"key":"R28-8-20260203","first-page":"467","article-title":"Proseal laryngeal mask airway: A study of 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic surgery","volume":"47","author":"Sharma","year":"2003","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R29-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aen366","article-title":"Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation","volume":"102","author":"Uppal","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R30-8-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.12669\/pjms.292.2980","article-title":"Comparison of postoperative complication between laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube during low-flow anesthesia with controlled ventilation","volume":"29","author":"Peirovifar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"key":"R31-8-20260203","first-page":"65","article-title":"Postoperative sore throat in children: Comparison between proseal LMA and classic LMA","volume":"22","author":"Mokhtar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Middle East J Anesthesiol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01607275-201430020-00008","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T19:29:44Z","timestamp":1786735784000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/0970-9185.130008"}},"subtitle":["A prospective randomized study"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0970-9185.130008","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9185"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9185","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}}}