{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T20:31:45Z","timestamp":1786739505773,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>i-gel\u2122 and the ProSeal\u2122 laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) are two supraglottic airway devices with gastric channel used for airway maintenance in anesthesia. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of i-gel compared with PLMA for airway maintenance in pediatric patients under general anesthesia with controlled ventilation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 patients were included in the study and randomized to either i-gel or PLMA group. After induction of anesthesia using a standardized protocol for all the patients, one of supraglottic airway devices was inserted. Insertion parameters, ease of gastric tube insertion and fiber-optic scoring of the glottis were noted. Airway parameters such as end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      ), peak airway pressures and leak airway pressures were noted. Patients were observed for any complications in the first 12 h of the post-operative period.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Both groups were comparable in terms of ease of insertion, number of attempts and other insertion parameters. Ease of gastric tube insertion, EtCO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      , airway pressures (peak and leak airway pressure) and fiber-optic view of the glottis were comparable in both groups. There were no clinically significant complications in the first 12 h of the post-operative period.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>i-gel is as effective as PLMA in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.130013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,4]],"date-time":"2014-04-04T03:46:08Z","timestamp":1396583168000},"page":"195-198","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal\u2122 in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Sai","family":"Saran","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sandeep Kumar","family":"Mishra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ashok Shankar","family":"Badhe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arumugam","family":"Vasudevan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lenin Babu","family":"Elakkumanan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gayatri","family":"Mishra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-10-20260203","first-page":"44","article-title":"Comparison of LMA-ProSeal\u2122 with LMA Classic\u2122 in anaesthetised paralysed children","volume":"52","author":"Kanthed","year":"2008","journal-title":"Indian J Anesth"},{"key":"R2-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-9592.2011.03757.x","article-title":"Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal\u2122 and LMA-Classic\u2122 in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery","volume":"22","author":"Goyal","year":"2012","journal-title":"Paediatr Anaesth"},{"key":"R3-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2012.07088.x","article-title":"A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme\u2122 and LMAProSeal\u2122 in children","volume":"67","author":"Jagannathan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R4-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2005.04258.x","article-title":"Initial anatomic investigations of the i-gel airway: A novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff","volume":"60","author":"Levitan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R5-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1213\/ane.0b013e318164f062","article-title":"A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: An observational study of the i-gel","volume":"106","author":"Richez","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R7-10-20260203","first-page":"457","article-title":"A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position","volume":"76","author":"Brimacombe","year":"1993","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R8-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2009.05898.x","article-title":"A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway","volume":"64","author":"Janakiraman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R9-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1321","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2012.02765.x","article-title":"LMA ProSeal(TM) vs. i-gel(TM) in ventilated children: A randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask","volume":"56","author":"Gasteiger","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R10-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000194300.56739.1a","article-title":"The size 1(1\/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: A randomized, crossover investigation with the classic laryngeal mask airway","volume":"102","author":"Goldmann","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R11-10-20260203","first-page":"292","article-title":"A randomized clinical comparison of the intersurgical i-gel and LMA unique in non-obese adults during general surgery","volume":"77","author":"Cattano","year":"2011","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"},{"key":"R12-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2012.07072.x","article-title":"A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children","volume":"67","author":"Lee","year":"2012","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R13-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e318219d619","article-title":"Performance of the pediatric-sized i-gel compared with the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask in anesthetized and ventilated children","volume":"115","author":"Theiler","year":"2011","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R14-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2008.01869.x","article-title":"The i-gel, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: An observational study in children","volume":"53","author":"Beylacq","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R15-10-20260203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1118","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2009.06017.x","article-title":"A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients","volume":"64","author":"Francksen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"}],"container-title":["Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01607275-201430020-00010","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T19:29:30Z","timestamp":1786735770000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/0970-9185.130013"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0970-9185.130013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9185"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9185","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}}}