{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:33:38Z","timestamp":1786649618312,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Context:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Supraglottic airway devices have been used as an alternative to tracheal intubation during laparoscopic surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study was designed to compare the efficacy of Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) for positive pressure ventilation and postoperative complications with the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal (PLMA) for patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopies under general anesthesia with controlled ventilation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Settings and Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Prospective, crossover randomized controlled trial performed on patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 120 patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries were randomly allocated into two equal groups; PLMA and SLIPA groups. Number of intubation attempts, insertion time, ease of insertion, and fiberoptic bronchoscopic view were recorded. Lung mechanics data were collected 5 minutes after securing the airway, then after abdominal insufflation. Blood traces and regurgitation were checked for; postoperative sore throat and other complications were recorded.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Statistical Analysis:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Arithmetic mean and standard deviation values were calculated and statistical analyses were performed for each group. Independent sample\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test was used to compare continuous variables exhibiting normal distribution, and Chi-squared test for noncontinuous variables.\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      value &lt;0.05 was considered significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Insertion time, first insertion success rate, and ease of insertion were comparable in both groups. Fiberoptic bronchoscopic view was significantly better and epiglottic downfolding was significantly lower in SLIPA group. Sealing pressure and lung mechanics were similar. Gastric distension was not observed in both groups. Postoperative sore throat was significantly higher in PACU in PLMA group. Blood traces on the device were significantly more in SLIPA group.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>SLIPA can be used as a useful alternative to PLMA in patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgery with muscle relaxant and controlled ventilation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/1658-354x.84100","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,22]],"date-time":"2011-08-22T03:36:21Z","timestamp":1313984181000},"page":"270-276","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA\u2122) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal\u2122 for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Ashraf Abualhassan","family":"Abdellatif","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufiya University, Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monaz Abdulrahman","family":"Ali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufiya University, Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-200111000-00064","article-title":"Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients","volume":"93","author":"Brimacombe","year":"2001","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R2-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02387.x","article-title":"A comparison of the anesthetic requirement for tolerance of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube","volume":"47","author":"Akhtar","year":"1992","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R3-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/84.5.650","article-title":"The LMA \u2018ProSeal\u2019-a laryngeal mask with an esophageal vent","volume":"84","author":"Brain","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R4-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03017420","article-title":"The LMA-ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"49","author":"Maltby","year":"2002","journal-title":"Can J Anesth"},{"key":"R5-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.2003.02962.x","article-title":"Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway","volume":"58","author":"Miller","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R6-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/88.6.824","article-title":"ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"88","author":"Lu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R7-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03021826","article-title":"Advantage of ProSeal\u2122 and SLIPA\u2122 airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies","volume":"53","author":"Miller","year":"2006","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R8-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/82.2.286","article-title":"Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients","volume":"82","author":"Keller","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R9-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aei167","article-title":"Randomized crossover comparison of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with Laryngeal Tube Sonda during anesthesia with controlled ventilation","volume":"95","author":"Cook","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R10-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.4097\/kjae.2010.58.5.450","article-title":"The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPATM) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal TM during general anesthesia","volume":"58","author":"Choi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R11-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-198901000-00015","article-title":"Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on the lower esophageal sphincter","volume":"68","author":"Jones","year":"1989","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R13-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"622","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03018993","article-title":"Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs.tracheal intubation","volume":"47","author":"Maltby","year":"2000","journal-title":"Can J Anesth"},{"key":"R14-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000252460.94046.7c","article-title":"The effectiveness and patient comfort of the novel streamlined pharynx airway liner (SLIPATM) compared with the conventional laryngeal mask airway in ophthalmic surgery","volume":"104","author":"Lange","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R15-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1742-6723.2006.00894.x","article-title":"Randomized comparison of the SLIPA (Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway) and SS-LM (Soft Seal Laryngeal Mask) by medical students","volume":"18","author":"Hein","year":"2006","journal-title":"Emerg Med Australs"},{"key":"R16-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0803600312","article-title":"Haemodynamic and Bispectral index response to insertion of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA): Comparison with the laryngeal mask airway","volume":"36","author":"Puri","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"R17-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000189098.57662.d6","article-title":"A comparison between the PLA Cobra and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study","volume":"102","author":"Gaitini","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R18-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200007000-00019","article-title":"The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients","volume":"93","author":"Brimacombe","year":"2000","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R19-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/0952-8180(95)00026-E","article-title":"The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: A Meta analysis of published literature","volume":"7","author":"Brimacombe","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R20-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aei187","article-title":"Lingual nerve injury associated with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A case report and review of literature","volume":"95","author":"Brimacombe","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R21-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1258\/0022215042703741","article-title":"Nerve injury and laryngeal mask airway","volume":"118","author":"Bruce","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Laryngol Otol"},{"key":"R22-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200202000-00011","article-title":"A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients","volume":"96","author":"Brimacombe","year":"2002","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R23-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02173.x","article-title":"The effect of nitrous oxide on laryngeal mask cuff pressure in vitro and in vivo studies","volume":"47","author":"Lmb","year":"1992","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R24-20251006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.4097\/kjae.2005.49.1.67","article-title":"The comparison of laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube in spontaneous breathing anesthetized pediatric patients","volume":"49","author":"Lim","year":"2005","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"}],"container-title":["Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01437113-201105030-00007","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T18:56:08Z","timestamp":1786647368000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01437113-201105030-00007"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/1658-354x.84100","relation":{},"ISSN":["1658-354X","0975-3125"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1658-354X","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-3125","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]}}}