{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T19:30:42Z","timestamp":1787772642959,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PURPOSE:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of this study is to compare twelve intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes longer than 25.0 mm in terms of absolute error (AE), the percentage of postoperative emmetropia, and agreement interval in Bland\u2013Altman analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>MATERIALS AND METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Data of myopic patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification between January 2016 and July 2021 was reviewed. Intraocular lens power was calculated using Holladay 1, SRK\/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, Hill-RBF, Ladas, Kane, EVO, Pearl-DGS, and K6 formulas. Three months after phacoemulsification, refraction was measured, and mean AE was calculated. The percentage of patients with full visual acuity (VA) without any correction, with \u00b1 0.25D, \u00b10.5D, \u00b10.75D, and limits of agreement for each formula were established.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Ninety-one patients, whose ocular axial length ranged between 25.03 mm and 28.91 mm, were included in the study. The Barrett Universal II formula achieved the lowest mean AE of 0.11 \u00b1 0.11 (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001) just before Kane (0.13 \u00b1 0.09;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001 except vs. Haigis and Holladay 2) and SRK\/T formulas (0.18 \u00b1 0.12). In addition, the Barrett Universal II formula had the highest percentage of patients with full VA without any correction (72.5%) followed by Kane and Holladay 2 formulas (56.0% and 49.5%, respectively). Finally, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Haigis formulas obtained the lowest agreement interval (0.5725, 0.6088, and 0.8307, respectively).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSION:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Barrett Universal II formula is recommended for intraocular lens power calculation for eyeballs with the axial length longer than 25.0 mm. The Kane formula also gives very promising results in regarding the accuracy of intraocular lens power for myopic eyes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/2211-5056.357849","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,4]],"date-time":"2022-10-04T05:24:37Z","timestamp":1664861077000},"page":"225-230","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Analysis of accuracy of twelve intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes with axial myopia"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Wiktor","family":"Stopyra","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"MW Med Eye Centre, Cracow, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20240830","first-page":"NC01","article-title":"A comparative study to assess the predictability of different IOL power calculation formulas in eyes of short and long axial length","volume":"11","author":"Doshi","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"R2-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(02)01976-4","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with high axial myopia","volume":"29","author":"Tsang","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R3-20240830","first-page":"93","article-title":"The accuracy of IOL power calculation formulas for eyes of axial length exceeding 24.5 mm","volume":"115","author":"Stopyra","year":"2013","journal-title":"Klin Oczna"},{"key":"R4-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1097\/APO.0000000000000293","article-title":"Update on intraocular lens formulas and calculations","volume":"9","author":"Xia","year":"2020","journal-title":"Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)"},{"key":"R5-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"976847","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/976847","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens power formulas involving 148 eyes with long axial lengths:A retrospective chart-review study","volume":"2015","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R6-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13184","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long eyes:A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"46","author":"Wang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13058","article-title":"Meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in short eyes","volume":"46","author":"Wang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R8-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1332","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfo.2021.04.009","article-title":"Comparison of the accuracy of six intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes of axial length exceeding 25.0mm","volume":"44","author":"Stopyra","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Fr Ophtalmol"},{"key":"R9-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.01.018","article-title":"Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with axial myopia","volume":"45","author":"Liu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R10-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"732","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.025","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia:Comparison of Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas","volume":"45","author":"Rong","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R11-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_937_18","article-title":"Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia","volume":"67","author":"Zhou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000217","article-title":"High myopia and cataract surgery","volume":"27","author":"Chong","year":"2016","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R13-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.027","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas","volume":"125","author":"Melles","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R14-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2014.06.033","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm:Comparison of formulas and methods","volume":"41","author":"Abulafia","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R15-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672119889016","article-title":"Comparison of six methods for the intraocular lens power calculation in high myopic eyes","volume":"31","author":"Ji","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R16-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.21037\/aes.2019.04.02","article-title":"The future of intraocular lens calculations:Ladas super formula","volume":"4","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Eye Sci"},{"key":"R17-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2370","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672120962030","article-title":"Comparison of the accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulas","volume":"31","author":"Carmona-Gonz\u00e1lez","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R18-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672120902952","article-title":"Accuracy of the Hill-radial basis function method and the Barrett Universal II formula","volume":"31","author":"Nemeth","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R19-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e000251","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjophth-2018-000251","article-title":"Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection","volume":"4","author":"Connell","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R20-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4395","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S290125","article-title":"VRF-G, a new intraocular lens power calculation formula:A 13-formulas comparison study","volume":"14","author":"Hip\u00f3lito-Fernandes","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R22-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.07.032","article-title":"Formula choice:Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK\/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry","volume":"37","author":"Aristodemou","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R23-20240830","first-page":"330","article-title":"IOL power calculation in short and long eyes","volume":"6","author":"Hoffer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)"},{"key":"R24-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_600_19","article-title":"Evaluation of Barrett universal II formula for intraocular lens power calculation in Asian Indian population","volume":"68","author":"Kuthirummal","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R25-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.05.029","article-title":"Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy","volume":"160","author":"Hoffer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R26-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2015.015","article-title":"Understanding bland altman analysis","volume":"25","author":"Giavarina","year":"2015","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"key":"R27-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjem.2018.09.001","article-title":"Bland-Altman analysis:A paradigm to understand correlation and agreement","volume":"18","author":"Do\u011fan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Turk J Emerg Med"},{"key":"R28-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e31823d7784","article-title":"Agreed statistics:Measurement method comparison","volume":"116","author":"Bland","year":"2012","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R29-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.12.021","article-title":"Accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens power selection","volume":"43","author":"Kane","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R30-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-020-01571-1","article-title":"Influence of pupil dilation on the Barrett universal II (new generation), Haigis (4th generation), and SRK\/T (3rd generation) intraocular lens calculation formulas:a retrospective study","volume":"20","author":"Teshigawara","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R31-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.10.037","article-title":"C constant:New concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation","volume":"40","author":"Olsen","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/2211-5056.357849","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T19:07:14Z","timestamp":1787771234000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/2211-5056.357849"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,5]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/2211-5056.357849","relation":{},"ISSN":["2211-5056","2211-5072"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2211-5056","type":"print"},{"value":"2211-5072","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-04-05","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-06-14","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}