{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T13:14:58Z","timestamp":1787318098477,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"\n Background:<\/jats:title>\n This study aimed to analyze the effects of standard and high-resolution exposures on the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the evaluation of dental implant dimensions.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n A descriptive\u2013analytical study was carried out on 40 dry human mandibles with appropriate ridge quality based on panoramic radiography. CBCT (Soredex, Cranex 3D, Finland) with a large field of view (FOV) and CMOS flat panel detector were used. CBCT with standard and a high resolution was performed in each mandible. Axial images, reconstructed by OnDemand 3D software, were processed to prepare cross-sectional images from the areas marked by gutta-percha, and then measured by a ruler with an accuracy of 0.01 millimeter in the computer. Measurements were recorded by two observers and the obtained data were compared with the real ones.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n \n The results showed suitable repeatability in radiologic measurements (\n r<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.971), which is indicative of the high reliability of intraobserver measurement. The measurement of width with high-resolution exposure indicated a significant difference with the real condition (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < 0.001); however, this difference was not significant in the case of standard resolution (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n > 0.05). Measurement of height with high resolution showed a significant difference with the real condition in the right mandible (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.04) and left mandible (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.05); however, this difference was not significant in standard resolution (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n > 0.05).\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n Based on our findings, the standard CBCT resolution modality is suggested for dental implant images due to its higher accuracy than high-resolution methods for diagnosing the implant dimensions.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/abr.abr_386_21","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,27]],"date-time":"2023-09-27T07:41:41Z","timestamp":1695800501000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Impact of Using Standard and High-Resolution Exposure Modalities of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) System for Dental Implants Dimension Measurements"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Mojdeh","family":"Mehdizadeh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Parvaneh","family":"Rostamzadeh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hossein","family":"Taheri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2009.04.016","article-title":"A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy","volume":"75","author":"Liang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"R2-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"640.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2007.11.019","article-title":"Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: A radiation dose evaluation","volume":"133","author":"Silva","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R3-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/81272805","article-title":"The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT","volume":"41","author":"Vandenberghe","year":"2012","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R4-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2004.04.033","article-title":"Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography","volume":"128","author":"Walker","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R5-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tripleo.2007.02.028","article-title":"Evaluation of a limited cone-beam volumetric imaging system. Comparison with film radiography in detecting incipient proximal caries","volume":"104","author":"Tsuchida","year":"2007","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod"},{"key":"R6-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-005-0031-2","article-title":"State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement","volume":"10","author":"Guerrero","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"R7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2007.04.001","article-title":"Intraoperative navigation in the maxillofacial area based on 3D imaging obtained by a cone-beam device","volume":"36","author":"Mischkowski","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"R8-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e111237","DOI":"10.5812\/iranjradiol.111237","article-title":"Intra-oral ultrasonography of young adult mandibular foramen: A reliable method","volume":"18","author":"Mehdizadeh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Iran J Radiol"},{"key":"R9-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.4103\/1119-3077.178915","article-title":"Evaluation of mental foramen location in the 10-70 years age range using cone-beam computed tomography","volume":"20","author":"Gungor","year":"2017","journal-title":"Niger J Clin Pract"},{"key":"R10-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joen.2018.01.013","article-title":"A limited field cone-beam computed tomography-based evaluation of the mental foramen, accessory mental foramina, anterior loop, lateral lingual foramen, and lateral lingual canal","volume":"44","author":"Krishnan","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Endod"},{"key":"R11-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20180252","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20180252","article-title":"Is ultrasonography sufficient for evaluation of mental foramen?","volume":"48","author":"\u00c7a\u011flayan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofacial Radiology"},{"key":"R12-20240830","first-page":"125","article-title":"The intraoral ultrasonography in dentistry","volume":"21","author":"Caglayan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Niger J Clin Pract"},{"key":"R13-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1531","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-017-2257-1","article-title":"Cone beam computed tomography and ultrasonography imaging of benign intraosseous jaw lesion: A prospective radiopathological study","volume":"22","author":"Bayrakdar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"R14-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0b013e31824bf93c","article-title":"Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes","volume":"21","author":"Torres","year":"2012","journal-title":"Implant Dent"},{"key":"R15-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ics.2004.03.286","article-title":"Diagnostic possibilities of cone-beam computed tomography in the facial skeleton","volume":"1268","author":"Schulze","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int Congr Ser"},{"key":"R16-20240830","first-page":"32","article-title":"Implant imaging for the dentist","volume":"70","author":"Mupparapu","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Can Dent Assoc"},{"key":"R17-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/27536604","article-title":"Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate","volume":"35","author":"Wortche","year":"2006","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R18-20240830","first-page":"126","article-title":"Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"31","author":"Ziegler","year":"2002","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R19-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/15779208","article-title":"Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners","volume":"38","author":"Suomalainen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R20-20240830","first-page":"75","article-title":"Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice","volume":"72","author":"Scarfe","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Can Dent Assoc"},{"key":"R21-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.2334\/josnusd.48.27","article-title":"Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT","volume":"48","author":"Hashimoto","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Oral Sci"},{"key":"R22-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.2174\/1874210602014010337","article-title":"Incidental findings in temporomandibular joint region detected by cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study","volume":"14","author":"Mehdizadeh","year":"2020","journal-title":"Open Dentistry J"},{"key":"R23-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10024-1609","article-title":"Evaluation of the relationship between mandibular third molar and mandibular canal by different algorithms of cone-beam computed tomography","volume":"15","author":"Mehdizadeh","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Contemp Dent Pract"},{"key":"R24-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10024-2300","article-title":"Evaluation of relationship between exposure parameters and maxillofacial bone quality with salivary glands absorbed dose in cone beam computed tomography imaging","volume":"19","author":"Mehdizadeh","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Contemp Dent Pract"},{"key":"R25-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/14140281","article-title":"Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography","volume":"37","author":"Suomalainen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R26-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/27546065","article-title":"A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions","volume":"40","author":"Al-Ekrish","year":"2011","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R27-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/31349994","article-title":"Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures","volume":"37","author":"Stratemann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R28-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/21152480","article-title":"Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: A tale of two CTs","volume":"41","author":"Patcas","year":"2012","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R29-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2011.06.034","article-title":"Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth","volume":"141","author":"Patcas","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"}],"container-title":["Advanced Biomedical Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/abr.abr_386_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T19:15:39Z","timestamp":1787166939000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/abr.abr_386_21"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/abr.abr_386_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["2277-9175"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2277-9175","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-12-12","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-02-13","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}