{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T20:35:56Z","timestamp":1786739756736,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) is a chronic pain disorder causing unilateral, severe brief stabbing recurrent pain in the distribution of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Conventional radiofrequency (CRF) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) are two types of minimally invasive treatment. CRF selectively ablates the part of ganglion to provide the relief, but it has been found to be associated with some side effects such as dysesthesia or sensory loss in 6%\u201328% and loss of corneal reflex in 3%\u20138% of patients. PRF is a comparatively newer modality which is a nondestructive and neuromodulatory method of delivering radiofrequency energy to the gasserian ganglion to produce a therapeutic effect.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We aimed to compare the efficacy of CRF with long-duration, fixed voltage PRF in the treatment of idiopathic TGN.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study was conducted in a tertiary care center research institute.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Study Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This was a prospective randomized trial.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Twenty-seven adult patients of TGN were included in the study and randomly allocated into two groups (CRF and PRF). All procedures were performed operation suite with C-arm fluoroscopic guidance. Both, pre- and postprocedure, the patients were assessed for pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Pain Intensity Scale at 1 week and thereafter at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. Patients with a BNI score \u22654 after 1 month were considered a failure and offered other modes of treatment. A reduction in VAS score \u226550% and a BNI score &lt;4 were considered as effective.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Statistical Analysis:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Discreet variables were recorded as proportions, ordinal variables and continuous variables with non-Gaussian distribution as medians with interquartile range, and continuous variables with Gaussian distribution as mean \u00b1 standard deviation. Association between ordinal variables was tested by Fisher's exact test\/Chi-square test whenever appropriate. Equality of means\/median was tested by using paired\/unpaired\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test or nonparametric tests depending upon the distribution of data.\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2264 0.5 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 13.04 windows.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Efficacy in terms of decrease in VAS \u226550% at 1 month was 33.33% and 83.33% in the PRF and CRF groups, respectively, which was statistically significant(\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.036). Effective reduction in BNI scores at the 7\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      day, 1 month, and 2 months postprocedure was evaluated and found in 41.67% and 83.33% of patients in the PRF and CRF groups, respectively, which was statistically insignificant (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.089). There was a statistically significant reduction in BNI scores in PRF and CRF group patients at 3 and 6 months (at 3 months, 33.33% and 83.33%,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.036 and at 6 months, 25% and 83.33%,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.012). In the CRF group, mild hypoesthesia was evident in three patients which improved by the end of 1 month while no side effects were seen in the PRF group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>CRF is a more effective procedure to decrease pain in comparison to long-duration, fixed voltage PRF for the treatment of idiopathic TGN. Although the side effects are more with CRF, they are mild and self-limiting.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/aer.aer_56_21","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,30]],"date-time":"2021-08-30T15:16:53Z","timestamp":1630336613000},"page":"14-19","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Radiofrequency Treatment of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia (Conventional vs. Pulsed)"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Anurag","family":"Agarwal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shivani","family":"Rastogi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Manjari","family":"Bansal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suraj","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deepak","family":"Malviya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anup K.","family":"Thacker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1155\/2001\/108138","article-title":"Tic douloureux","volume":"6","author":"Loeser","year":"2001","journal-title":"Pain Res Manag"},{"key":"R4-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1164","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000088806.11659.D8","article-title":"A new classification for facial pain","volume":"53","author":"Burchiel","year":"2003","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"R5-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.9790\/0853-1223639","article-title":"Medical management of trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"12","author":"Subashree","year":"2013","journal-title":"IOSR J Dent Med Sci"},{"key":"R6-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1177\/1756285609359317","article-title":"Treatment options in trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"3","author":"Obermann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ther Adv Neurol Disord"},{"key":"R7-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1097\/00002508-200201000-00004","article-title":"Pharmacotherapy of trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"18","author":"Sindrup","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"R8-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1204","DOI":"10.1001\/archneur.1984.04050220102026","article-title":"Trigeminal neuralgia.Current concepts regarding etiology and pathogenesis","volume":"41","author":"Fromm","year":"1984","journal-title":"Arch Neurol"},{"key":"R9-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.311.7012.1047","article-title":"Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: A systematic review","volume":"311","author":"McQuay","year":"1995","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R10-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2506","DOI":"10.1016\/S0149-2918(03)80314-4","article-title":"Newer antiepileptic drugs: Possible uses in the treatment of neuropathic pain and migraine","volume":"25","author":"Pappagallo","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Ther"},{"key":"R11-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1433","DOI":"10.1007\/s40265-018-0964-9","article-title":"Current and innovative pharmacological options to treat typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"78","author":"Di Stefano","year":"2018","journal-title":"Drugs"},{"key":"R12-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1136\/jnnp.68.1.59","article-title":"Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: Comments on a series of 250 cases, including 10 patients with multiple sclerosis","volume":"68","author":"Broggi","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry"},{"key":"R13-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.16964","article-title":"Trigeminal nerve block with alcohol for medically intractable classic trigeminal neuralgia: Long-term clinical effectiveness on pain","volume":"14","author":"Han","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"key":"R14-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.4103\/ijpn.ijpn_55_19","article-title":"Percutaneous balloon compression of Gasserian ganglion for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"33","author":"Rastogi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian J Pain"},{"key":"R15-4-20240901","first-page":"105","article-title":"Percutaneous balloon compression of Gasserian ganglion for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: An experience from India","volume":"23","author":"Agarwal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Middle East J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R16-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/87.1.117","article-title":"Trigeminal neuralgia \u2013 pathophysiology, diagnosis and current treatment","volume":"87","author":"Nurmikko","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R17-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1125","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199604253341709","article-title":"Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"334","author":"Fields","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R19-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1526-4637.2006.00210.x","article-title":"Pulsed radiofrequency","volume":"7","author":"Bogduk","year":"2006","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"R20-4-20240901","first-page":"133","article-title":"Trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"94","author":"Zakrzewska","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"R21-4-20240901","first-page":"166","article-title":"Outcome of radio- surgery treatment with a linear accelerator in patients with trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"32","author":"Cordero Tous","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurol Engl Ed"},{"key":"R22-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1016\/j.adaj.2016.02.014","article-title":"Prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review","volume":"147","author":"de Toledo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Am Dent Assoc"},{"key":"R23-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1097\/00006123-200103000-00013","article-title":"Percutaneous controlled radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1,600 patients","volume":"48","author":"Kanpolat","year":"2001","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"R24-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejpain.2006.04.001","article-title":"Comparison of pulsed radiofrequency with conventional radiofrequency in the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"11","author":"Erdine","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Pain"},{"key":"R25-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.5812\/aapm.3493","article-title":"Pulsed radiofrequency treatment for trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"1","author":"Chua","year":"2012","journal-title":"Anesthesiol Pain Med"},{"key":"R26-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1111\/papr.12227","article-title":"Comparison of high-voltage- with standard-voltage pulsed radiofrequency of gasserian ganglion in the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"15","author":"Fang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pain Pract"},{"key":"R27-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1002\/j.1532-2149.2012.00278.x","article-title":"Pulsed radiofrequency treatment for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective analysis of the causes for ineffective pain relief","volume":"17","author":"Luo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Pain"},{"key":"R28-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1111\/pme.12046","article-title":"Pulsed and conventional radiofrequency treatment: Which is effective for dental procedure-related symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia?","volume":"14","author":"Kim","year":"2013","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"R29-4-20240901","first-page":"63","article-title":"Pulsed radiofrequency for treating trigeminal neuralgia","volume":"18","author":"Abd-Elsayed","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ochsner J"}],"container-title":["Anesthesia Essays &amp; Researches"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/aer.aer_56_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T19:32:23Z","timestamp":1786735943000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/aer.aer_56_21"}},"subtitle":["A Prospective Randomized Control Study"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/aer.aer_56_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["0259-1162"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0259-1162","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}}}