{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T16:17:40Z","timestamp":1787761060928,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"abstract":"\n Background:<\/jats:title>\n Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be common complication of anesthesia and surgery in spite of availability of so many antiemetic drugs and regimens for prevention. This study compared Ramosetron and Levosulpiride in terms of efficacy for PONV prevention after laparoscopic surgery.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Aim:<\/jats:title>\n To compare the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) Levosulpiride 25 mg with i.v. Ramosetron 0.3 mg in preventing PONV.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Setting:<\/jats:title>\n S. D. M. College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad from November 2018 to June 2020.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design:<\/jats:title>\n It is a prospective randomized double-blind study.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Statistical Analysis:<\/jats:title>\n \n All the data were collected, tabulated, and expressed as mean \u00b1 standard deviation. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0 Evaluation version). Unpaired sample\n t<\/jats:italic>\n -test and Chi-square test have been used for the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. A\n P<\/jats:italic>\n value of 0.05 was considered statistically insignificant.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n This prospective randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 200 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery falling under the inclusion criteria are numbered and every nth patient selected by systemic random sampling procedure and allocated into two groups of 100 each, group Levosulpiride (Group L) and group Ramosetron (group R) study drugs givenwithin 30 min induction of anesthesia. Group L will receive LEVOSULPIRIDE 25 mg i.v. Group R will receive RAMOSETRON 0.3 mg i.v.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n \n The incidence of vomiting in the Levosulpiride group and in the Ramosetron groupduring 0-4 h (20% vs. 30%,\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.1110), 4-8 h (4% vs. 5%,\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.7450), 8-12 h (5% vs. 4%\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.7210) and 12-24 h (0% vs. 0%). The incidence of nausea and overall PONV and the use of rescue antiemetic was not significantly different during all time intervals. The severity of nausea was not different between the two groups. Difference in the efficacy of Levosulpiride and Ramosetron was statistically insignificant (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n > 0.05) in the prevention of PONV.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n Levosulpiride 25 mg or Ramosetron 0.3 mg given intravenously to prevent PONV inpatients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia are equally effective in controlling PONV.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/aer.aer_98_22","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,9]],"date-time":"2022-12-09T10:21:30Z","timestamp":1670581290000},"page":"307-310","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Levosulpiride and Ramosetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Surgery"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"R. T.","family":"Ranjithkumar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Imran","family":"Sholapur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ravi","family":"Bhat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C. Chandan","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1213\/ane.0b013e31817b604e","article-title":"We\u2019re tired of waiting","volume":"107","author":"Lichtor","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R2-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1271","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199712000-00001","article-title":"The \u201cbig little problem\u201d of postoperative nausea and vomiting: Do we know the answer yet?","volume":"87","author":"Fisher","year":"1997","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R3-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000068580.00245.95","article-title":"Department of Anesthesiology DUMC Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting","volume":"97","author":"Gan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R4-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199909000-00022","article-title":"Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients","volume":"89","author":"Macario","year":"1999","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R6-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3904\/kjim.1998.13.1.15","article-title":"Effects of levosulpiride in patients with functional dyspepsia accompanied by delayed gastric emptying","volume":"13","author":"Song","year":"1998","journal-title":"Korean J Intern Med"},{"key":"R7-4-20240901","first-page":"200","article-title":"Prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"5","author":"Kaul","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Sci Stud"},{"key":"R8-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/0885-3924(95)00105-8","article-title":"Effectiveness of levosulpiride versus metoclopramide for nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study","volume":"10","author":"Corli","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Pain Symptom Manage"},{"key":"R9-4-20240901","first-page":"903","article-title":"Antiemetic efficacy and safety of L-sulpiride in patients with digestive and other disorders","volume":"41","author":"Zanoboni","year":"1987","journal-title":"Curr Ther Res"},{"key":"R10-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aep209","article-title":"Comparison of ramosetron with ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery","volume":"103","author":"Kim","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R11-4-20240901","first-page":"472","article-title":"Ramosetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing gynecological surgery","volume":"90","author":"Fujii","year":"2000","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R12-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.3393\/ac.2018.34.1.36","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of Ramosetron injection for nausea and vomiting in colorectal-cancer patients undergoing a laparoscopic colectomy: A randomized, double-blind, comparative study","volume":"34","author":"Park","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Coloproctol"},{"key":"R13-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03011739","article-title":"Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ondansetron, tropisetron, granisetron and metoclopramide in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized, double-blind comparison with placebo","volume":"43","author":"Naguib","year":"1996","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R14-4-20240901","first-page":"35","article-title":"Efficacy of levosulpride in minimizing post-operative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"6","author":"Sharma","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Contemp Med Res"},{"key":"R15-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-015-0102-0","article-title":"Comparison of palonosetron, granisetron, and ramosetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: A prospective randomized trial","volume":"15","author":"Lee","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R16-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.4097\/kjae.2013.64.2.133","article-title":"A randomized, double-blindstudy to evaluate the efficacy of ramosetron and palonosetron for prevention ofpostoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecological laparoscopic surgery","volume":"64","author":"Park","year":"2013","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R17-4-20240901","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-009-0670-5","article-title":"Ramosetron versus ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"24","author":"Ryu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Anesthesia Essays & Researches"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/aer.aer_98_22","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T15:18:05Z","timestamp":1787757485000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/aer.aer_98_22"}},"subtitle":["A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Study"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/aer.aer_98_22","relation":{},"ISSN":["0259-1162"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0259-1162","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]}}}