{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T12:49:48Z","timestamp":1790772588816,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background and Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) offers minimally invasive decompression when conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. Stents can be placed from the intrahepatic ducts into the stomach (hepaticogastrostomy [HG]) or from the extrahepatic bile duct into the small intestine (choledochoduodenostomy [CCD]). Long-term patency of these stents is unknown. In this study, we aim to compare long-term patency of CCD <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">versus<\/jats:italic> HG.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Consecutive patients from 12 centers were included in a registry over 14 years. Demographics, procedure info, adverse events, and follow-up data were collected. Student's <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>-test, Chi\u2013square, and logistic regression analyses were conducted. Only patients with at least 6-month follow-up or who died within 6-month postprocedure were included.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>One-hundred and eighty-two patients were included (93% male; mean age: 70; HG n = 95, CCD n = 87). No significant difference in indication, diagnosis, dissection instrument, or stent type was seen between the two groups. Technical success was 92% in both groups. Clinical success was achieved in 75\/87 (86%) in the HG group and 80\/80 (100%) in the CCD group. A trend toward higher adverse events was seen in the CCD group. A total of 25 patients out of 87 needed stent revision in the HG group (success rate 71%), while eight out of 80 were revised in the CCD group (success rate 90%). Chi square shows CCD success higher than HG (90% <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">vs<\/jats:italic>. 71%, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic> = 0.010). After adjusting for diagnosis, jaundice or cholangitis presentation, instrument used for dissection, and gender, CCD was 4.5 times more likely than HG to achieve longer stent patency or manage obstruction (odds ratio 4.5; 95% 1.1548\u201317.6500, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic> = 0.0302).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>CCD is associated with superior long-term patency than HG but with a trend toward higher adverse events. This is particularly important in patients with increased survival. Additional studies are required before recommending a change in practice.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/eus-d-21-00006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,8]],"date-time":"2021-09-08T08:50:21Z","timestamp":1631091021000},"page":"38-43","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Amy","family":"Tyberg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bertrand","family":"Napoleon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carlos","family":"Robles-Medranda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Janak N.","family":"Shah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erwan","family":"Bories","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nikhil A.","family":"Kumta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andres Sanchez","family":"Yague","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Enrique","family":"Vazquez-Sequeiros","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sundeep","family":"Lakhtakia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abdul Hamid El","family":"Chafic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shawn L.","family":"Shah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sohini","family":"Sameera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Augustine","family":"Tawadros","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jose Celso","family":"Ardengh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Prashant","family":"Kedia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monica","family":"Gaidhane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marc","family":"Giovannini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michel","family":"Kahaleh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.2006.097543","article-title":"Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice","volume":"56","author":"Williams","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"R2-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2012.02.019","article-title":"Association between volume of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at an academic medical center and use of pancreatobiliary therapy","volume":"10","author":"Cot\u00e9","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"R3-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.4253\/wjge.v11.i5.354","article-title":"Comprehensive review on EUS-guided biliary drainage","volume":"11","author":"Salerno","year":"2019","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R4-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1097\/MCG.0000000000000948","article-title":"EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus hepaticogastrostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"52","author":"Uemura","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Clin Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R5-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1372","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v19.i9.1372","article-title":"Endoscopic ultrasonography guided biliary drainage: Summary of consortium meeting, May 7th, 2011, Chicago","volume":"19","author":"Kahaleh","year":"2013","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R6-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1177\/2050640618808147","article-title":"Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Hedjoudje","year":"2019","journal-title":"United European Gastroenterol J"},{"key":"R7-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.21037\/tgh.2019.01.03","article-title":"Endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary drainage: A comprehensive review","volume":"4","author":"Mishra","year":"2019","journal-title":"Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"R8-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2016.05.035","article-title":"EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP: A novel algorithm individualized based on patient anatomy","volume":"84","author":"Tyberg","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R9-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(04)02593-3","article-title":"Efficacy and complications of covered Wallstents in malignant distal biliary obstruction","volume":"61","author":"Kahaleh","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R10-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-196805000-00013","article-title":"Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: A preliminary report","volume":"167","author":"McCune","year":"1968","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"R11-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"898","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2001-17324","article-title":"Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: A new technique for biliary drainage","volume":"33","author":"Giovannini","year":"2001","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"R12-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2014.09.054","article-title":"Multicenter comparative evaluation of endoscopic placement of expandable metal stents for malignant distal common bile duct obstruction by ERCP or EUS-guided approach","volume":"81","author":"Dhir","year":"2015","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R13-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2015.10.033","article-title":"Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review","volume":"83","author":"Wang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R14-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"950","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2014.09.047","article-title":"Hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: Is there any difference?","volume":"81","author":"Artifon","year":"2015","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R15-5-20241018","first-page":"156","article-title":"Comparison of the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and hepaticogastrostomy for bile duct obstruction with duodenal obstruction","volume":"48","author":"Ogura","year":"2016","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"R16-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9469472","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/9469472","article-title":"Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using a fully covered metallic stent after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography","volume":"2016","author":"Guo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gastroenterol Res Pract"},{"key":"R17-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.27","article-title":"Multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Japan","volume":"21","author":"Kawakubo","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"R18-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E175","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-109083","article-title":"International multicenter comparative trial of transluminal EUS-guided biliary drainage via hepatogastrostomy vs. choledochoduodenostomy approaches","volume":"4","author":"Khashab","year":"2016","journal-title":"Endosc Int Open"},{"key":"R19-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1067","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2016.09.010","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of a newly developed hybrid metal stent for EUS-guided biliary drainage (with videos)","volume":"85","author":"Cho","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R20-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-015-3933-0","article-title":"Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"61","author":"Khan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci"},{"key":"R21-5-20241018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S8","DOI":"10.4103\/2303-9027.212266","article-title":"OR-THER-04: Long-term outcomes and reintervention of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 96 cases","volume":"6","author":"Nakai","year":"2017","journal-title":"Endosc Ultrasound"}],"container-title":["Endoscopic Ultrasound"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.4103\/EUS-D-21-00006","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,18]],"date-time":"2024-10-18T01:07:33Z","timestamp":1729213653000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.4103\/EUS-D-21-00006"}},"subtitle":["An international multicenter study on their long-term patency"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/eus-d-21-00006","relation":{},"ISSN":["2303-9027"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2303-9027","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}}}