{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T20:05:37Z","timestamp":1787169937364,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Both transvaginal mesh surgery with wide arms (TVMWA) and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) are effective surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with reportedly low recurrence rates. In the present study, we compared the postoperative outcomes of TVMWA and LSC.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We retrospectively evaluated 142 patients with POP who underwent LSC or TVMWA at our hospital. We measured the changes in lower urinary tract symptoms before and after surgery using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) plus Quality of Life (QOL) score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short-Form (ICIQ-SF), postvoiding residual urine volume (PVR), and 60-min pad weight testing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The median blood loss was much lower in the LSC group than in the TVMWA group. However, the median surgical duration was significantly longer in the LSC group than in the TVMWA group (both\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.0001). The PVR, IPSS plus QOL scores, OABSS, and ICIQ-SF scores all decreased significantly after surgery in both the groups. There were no significant changes between the pre- and postoperative 60-min pad weights in either group. There were no significant differences in the rate of stress urinary incontinence, mesh exposure, or prolapse recurrence after surgery between the two groups. ICIQ-SF scores were significantly more improved in the TVMWA group compared to the LSC group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We conclude that both TVMWA and LSC are effective surgical methods of ameliorating POP. However, considering the burden such as longer operative time on the patient treated with LSC, we recommend more frequent employment of TVMWA.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/gmit.gmit-d-24-00024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,7]],"date-time":"2026-02-07T16:00:13Z","timestamp":1770480013000},"page":"52-57","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A Comparison of the Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy and Transvaginal Surgery Using ORIHIME\u00ae Mesh with Wide Arms for Pelvic Organ Prolapse"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Kenji","family":"Kuroda","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Koetsu","family":"Hamamoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kazuki","family":"Kawamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ayako","family":"Masunaga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akio","family":"Horiguchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keiichi","family":"Ito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0976-9","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"21","author":"Haylen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R2-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000057","article-title":"Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U. S. Women","volume":"123","author":"Wu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R3-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","article-title":"Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"24","author":"Barber","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R4-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.13587","article-title":"Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database","volume":"25","author":"Obinata","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"key":"R5-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-022-01702-z","article-title":"Comparison of transvaginal mesh surgery and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"22","author":"Kusuda","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"key":"R6-20260209","first-page":"73","article-title":"Long-term outcome of synthetic mesh use in Iranian women with genital prolapse","volume":"17","author":"Bastani","year":"2020","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"key":"R7-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: A randomized trial","volume":"204","author":"Maher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R8-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"552","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2014.07.006","article-title":"Acomparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair","volume":"53","author":"Liu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R9-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1082","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.9027","article-title":"Laparoscopic reconstructive surgery is superior to vaginal reconstruction in the pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"11","author":"Park","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"key":"R10-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E432","DOI":"10.5489\/cuaj.5095","article-title":"Efficacy and patient satisfaction of pelvic organ prolapse reduction using transvaginal mesh: A Canadian perspective","volume":"12","author":"Aub\u00e9","year":"2018","journal-title":"Can Urol Assoc J"},{"key":"R11-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.4111\/icu.2018.59.2.133","article-title":"Short-term outcomes of the transvaginal minimal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"59","author":"Takazawa","year":"2018","journal-title":"Investig Clin Urol"},{"key":"R12-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13908","article-title":"Comparison between laparoscopic uterus\/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"45","author":"Wei","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"R13-20260209","first-page":"e53388","article-title":"Favorable postoperative outcomes after transvaginal mesh surgery using a wide-arm ORIHIME\u00aemesh","volume":"16","author":"Kuroda","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"R14-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1007\/s40477-022-00732-w","article-title":"Additional value of Doppler ultrasound to B-mode ultrasound in assessing for uterine intracavitary pathologies among perimenopausal and postmenopausal bleeding women: A multicentre prospective observational study in Vietnam","volume":"26","author":"Nguyen","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Ultrasound"},{"key":"R15-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.22053","article-title":"Endometrial thickness and uterine artery Doppler parameters as soft markers for prediction of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal bleeding women: A cross-sectional study at tertiary referral hospitals from Vietnam","volume":"65","author":"Nguyen","year":"2022","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci"},{"key":"R16-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-199508000-00016","article-title":"Laparoscopic procedures for stress incontinence and prolapse","volume":"7","author":"Wattiez","year":"1995","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R17-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","article-title":"The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience","volume":"250","author":"Clavien","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"R18-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2209-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 1- to 4-year follow-up of women postoperatively","volume":"25","author":"Rahmanou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R19-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1469","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3296-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: A randomised controlled trial","volume":"28","author":"Coolen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R20-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18367","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-69221-w","article-title":"Comparative efficacy of bilateral mesh sacrospinous ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with metroptosis","volume":"14","author":"Wang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"R21-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000177","article-title":"What part does mesh play in urogenital prolapse management today?","volume":"25","author":"Costantini","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"key":"R22-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2010.02469.x","article-title":"Tension-free vaginal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse: A single-center experience of 310 cases with 1-year follow up","volume":"17","author":"Takahashi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"key":"R23-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gmit.2016.05.005","article-title":"How to reduce the operative time of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy?","volume":"6","author":"Hoshino","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther"},{"key":"R24-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.5980\/jpnjurol.110.112","article-title":"LSC (laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy) versus uphold type TVM: A case control study","volume":"110","author":"Sato","year":"2019","journal-title":"Jpn J Urol"},{"key":"R25-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2018.02.023","article-title":"Trans-vaginal mesh surgery for management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse following abdominal sacrocolpopexy","volume":"57","author":"Lo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R26-20260209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2017.10.016","article-title":"Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up","volume":"56","author":"Lo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00024","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T19:15:14Z","timestamp":1787166914000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00024"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/gmit.gmit-d-24-00024","relation":{},"ISSN":["2213-3070","2213-3089"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2213-3070","type":"print"},{"value":"2213-3089","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-08-29","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-03-10","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}