{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T20:02:09Z","timestamp":1787169729807,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the clinical efficacy and urodynamic parameter changes between the MiniArc and the Solyx sling for the treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      One-hundred and thirty (MiniArc\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 79, BS-Solyx\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 51) patients were included in this study. Cough stress test (ST), pad test (PT), Incontinence Impact short form Questionnaire (IIQ-7), Urogenital Distress Inventory six-item questionnaire (UDI-6), Sexual Questionnaire-Short Form (PIS-Q), and urodynamic parametric changes were assessed to determine objective and subjective outcomes following the procedure. Objective cure was defined as negative ST and PT &lt;2 g and subjective cure was defined as \u201cNo\u201d to the answer of UDI-6 Question #3. Predictors of surgical failure were also determined.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      All Solyx users, as opposed to 91.1% of MiniArc patients, obtained objective cure at postoperative 3 months (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.042). No significant difference in subjective cure rates (93.7% vs. 90.2% at 3-months (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.513); 89.9% vs. 80.4% at 1 year for Solyx and MiniArc patients, respectively (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.126)) and improvement scores in UDI-6 and IIQ-7 were observed. The Solyx group incurred more\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">de novo<\/jats:italic>\n                      urgency (17.6% vs. 6.3% at 3 months (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.042); 23.5% vs. 7.6% at 1 year (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.01)). Both procedures yielded significant decrements in maximal urethral closure pressure (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001) and average flow rate (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.015). The preoperative PT and sling type were strong predictors of surgical failure, where the Solyx tape reported lower odds (odds ratio = 0.174,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.02) compared to the MiniArc sling.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Single-incision mini-slings are safe and effective treatment for female USI. The Solyx SIS demonstrated superiority over the MiniArc in this study based on its higher objective cure rate and lower risk for surgical failure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/gmit.gmit_102_20","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,5]],"date-time":"2021-11-05T02:44:11Z","timestamp":1636080251000},"page":"235-242","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Urodynamic Changes Using Single-incision Slings (MiniArc\u00ae vs. Solyx\u2122) for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Fook Chin","family":"Chiang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ryan","family":"Sun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu-Jun","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yi-Ing","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mou-Jong","family":"Sun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1592","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.12137","article-title":"Urinary incontinence in women: A Review","volume":"318","author":"Lukacz","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R2-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1080\/13697137.2018.1543263","article-title":"The prevalence of urinary incontinence","volume":"22","author":"Milsom","year":"2019","journal-title":"Climacteric"},{"key":"R3-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2017.10.003","article-title":"The prevalence of urinary incontinence in nulliparous adolescent and middle-aged women and the associated risk factors: A systematic review","volume":"107","author":"Almousa","year":"2018","journal-title":"Maturitas"},{"key":"R4-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.02.2369","article-title":"Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence","volume":"183","author":"Dmochowski","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R5-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1942-5","article-title":"A comparative study of a single-incision sling and a transobturator sling: Clinical efficacy and urodynamic changes","volume":"24","author":"Sun","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R7-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1127-z","article-title":"Single incision mini-sling versus a transobturator sling: A comparative study on MiniArc\u2122iand Monarc\u2122oslings","volume":"21","author":"De Ridder","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R8-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1065-9","article-title":"Preliminary findings with the Solyx single-incision sling system in female stress urinary incontinence","volume":"21","author":"Serels","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R10-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1925","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04145-y","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing mini-sling with transobturator sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence","volume":"31","author":"Maturana","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R11-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2008.11.006","article-title":"MiniArc: Preliminary prospective study on 72 cases","volume":"38","author":"Debodinance","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris"},{"key":"R12-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.3834\/uij.1944-5784.2011.02.05","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of the Solyx\u2122 single-incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: Preliminary results","volume":"4","author":"Serels","year":"2011","journal-title":"UroToday Int J"},{"key":"R13-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0976-9","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"21","author":"Haylen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R14-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.1930140206","article-title":"Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group","volume":"14","author":"Uebersax","year":"1995","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"R15-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1167-3","article-title":"A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse\/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)","volume":"15","author":"Rogers","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"R16-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.02.1157","article-title":"Long Term Follow-up Data on the MiniArc\u2122 Single Incision Sling System for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence","volume":"185","author":"Pickens","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R17-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.02.1156","article-title":"Pringle S, Presthus J, Nguyen J, et al.Two years prospective evaluation of the MiniArc single incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence","volume":"185","author":"Kennelly","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R18-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.08.647","article-title":"Five-Year outcome of miniarc single-incision sling used in the treatment of primary urodynamic stress incontinence","volume":"25","author":"Lo","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R19-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"688","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.07.013","article-title":"Evaluation of clinical outcome and risk factors for failure of single-incision midurethral short tape procedure (Solyx Tape) for stress urinary incontinence","volume":"26","author":"Lo","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R20-7-20240830","first-page":"13","article-title":"Long term follow up of the Solyx single incision sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI)","volume":"4","author":"Serels","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R21-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2014.09.013","article-title":"Is single incision midurethral sling effective in patients with low maximal urethral closure pressure?","volume":"55","author":"Sun","year":"2016","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R22-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2010.04.022","article-title":"Updated systemic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and mid-urethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence","volume":"58","author":"Novara","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"R23-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.07.538","article-title":"Single incision mid-urethral sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence","volume":"77","author":"Pickens","year":"2011","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"R24-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.08.032","article-title":"Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications","volume":"65","author":"Mostafa","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"R25-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-55382009000300010","article-title":"The MiniArc sling system in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence","volume":"35","author":"Gauruder-Burmester","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"R26-7-20240830","first-page":"893","article-title":"Complications of female urinary incontinence surgery with mini-sling system","volume":"34","author":"Alvarez-Bandr\u00e9s","year":"2010","journal-title":"Actas Urol Esp"},{"key":"R27-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l1842","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l1842","article-title":"Surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"365","author":"Imamura","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R28-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acuro.2010.11.016","article-title":"Evaluation of urodynamic parameters following the placement of tension-free tape","volume":"35","author":"Quintero","year":"2011","journal-title":"Actas Urol Esp"},{"key":"R29-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1020-9","article-title":"Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence","volume":"21","author":"Stav","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R30-7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2912-5","article-title":"Risk factors for failure of repeat midurethral sling surgery for recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence","volume":"27","author":"Lo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/GMIT.GMIT_102_20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T19:11:52Z","timestamp":1787166712000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/GMIT.GMIT_102_20"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/gmit.gmit_102_20","relation":{},"ISSN":["2213-3070"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2213-3070","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]}}}