{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T19:23:31Z","timestamp":1787772211987,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Among various options of contraception, bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) remains the most frequently used method for women worldwide even at present. However, up to 30% of those who undergo BTL eventually change their minds and wish to conceive again for a variety of reasons, such as a change in marital status or simply wanting more children. In this case, we can either approach it surgically with tubal re-anastomosis (TA) or by\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">in vitro<\/jats:italic>\n                    fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer. Despite the many advantages of TA which lead the American Society of Reproductive Medicine Committee Opinion to recommend it as the primary choice of treatment in posttubal ligation infertility in 2012, IVF is widely being chosen as the first-line treatment nowadays. This study will review the efficacy of TA in various aspects, including pregnancy rate, cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and accessibility, based on review of the literature and our experience. Through this study, we intend to provide a basis for gynecologists to consider TA as the first option in women who wish to conceive again after BTL in this day and age of IVF.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.4103\/gmit.gmit_43_23","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,13]],"date-time":"2024-05-13T06:00:26Z","timestamp":1715580026000},"page":"71-78","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Where Microsurgical Tubal Reanastomosis Stands in the In vitro Fertilization Era"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Hwa Sook","family":"Moon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Treatment, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bo Sun","family":"Joo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Reproduction Aging Center, The Korea Institute for Public Sperm Bank, Busan, Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sang Gap","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Treatment, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kyung Il","family":"Nam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Treatment, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ja Seong","family":"Koo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Treatment, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002376","article-title":"Interval female sterilization","volume":"131","author":"Stuart","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R2-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00481-7","article-title":"Tubal sterilization: Focus on the U. S. Experience","volume":"73","author":"Westhoff","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R4-20240830","first-page":"661","article-title":"Characteristics of women who considered or obtained tubal reanastomosis: Results from a prospective study of tubal sterilization","volume":"75","author":"Wilcox","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R5-20240830","first-page":"889","article-title":"Poststerilization regret: Findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization","volume":"93","author":"Hillis","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.08.006","article-title":"Regret following female sterilization at a young age: A systematic review","volume":"73","author":"Curtis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R7-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.12.031","article-title":"Committee opinion: Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology","volume":"97","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R8-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.01.051","article-title":"Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: A committee opinion","volume":"115","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R9-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1749-6632.1985.tb37565.x","article-title":"The world collaborative report on in vitro fertilization and embryo replacement: Current state of the art in January 1984","volume":"442","author":"Sepp\u00e4l\u00e4","year":"1985","journal-title":"Ann N Y Acad Sci"},{"key":"R10-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.09.010","article-title":"The place of reconstructive tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive techniques","volume":"31","author":"Gomel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"R11-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54769-4","article-title":"In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the United States: 1990 results from the IVF-ET Registry","volume":"57","year":"1992","journal-title":"Medical research international. Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.01.017","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American society for reproductive medicine\/society for assisted reproductive technology registry","volume":"81","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R14-20240830","year":"2006"},{"key":"R15-20240830","year":"2011","journal-title":"Reproductive Health"},{"key":"R16-20240830","first-page":"CD006415","article-title":"Surgery for tubal infertility","volume":"1","author":"Chua","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R17-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2660","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem248","article-title":"Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: Surgical reversal or IVF?","volume":"22","author":"Boeckxstaens","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R18-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx003","article-title":"Tubal anastomosis after previous sterilization: A systematic review","volume":"23","author":"van Seeters","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"R21-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.042","article-title":"Live delivery outcome after tubal sterilization reversal: a population-based study","volume":"104","author":"Malacova","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R23-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.01.041","article-title":"Restoring fertility in women aged 40 years and older after tubal ligation: Tubal anastomosis versus in vitro fertilization","volume":"113","author":"Peregrine","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R24-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.04.018","article-title":"Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis versus in vitro fertilization: Cost-based decision analysis","volume":"209","author":"Hirshfeld-Cytron","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R25-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.04.019","article-title":"Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation","volume":"104","author":"Messinger","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R26-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)53362-7","article-title":"Reversal of sterilization in women over 40 years of age: A multicenter survey in The Netherlands","volume":"53","author":"Trimbos-Kemper","year":"1990","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R27-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)58227-2","article-title":"Reproductive outcome after tubal reversal in women 40 years of age or older","volume":"65","author":"Glock","year":"1996","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R28-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01240.x","article-title":"Live birth following day surgery reversal of female sterilisation in women older than 40 years: A realistic option in Australia?","volume":"187","author":"Petrucco","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"R29-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.08.028","article-title":"Clinical factors determining pregnancy outcome after microsurgical tubal reanastomosis","volume":"92","author":"Gordts","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R30-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1844","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.10.028","article-title":"Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: A retrospective study","volume":"94","author":"Caillet","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R31-20240830","first-page":"161","article-title":"Microtubal reanastomosis: Success rates as compared to in vitro fertilization","volume":"55","author":"Hirth","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"R32-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew038","article-title":"Effectiveness of bilateral tubotubal anastomosis in a large outpatient population","volume":"31","author":"Berger","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R33-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.03.024","article-title":"Tubal anastomosis: Once in a blue moon?","volume":"110","author":"Estes","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R34-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000264591.43544.0f","article-title":"Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy","volume":"109","author":"Rodgers","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R35-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2014.00058","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2014.00058","article-title":"Complications of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery","volume":"18","author":"Fuentes","year":"2014","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"R36-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3293","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei253","article-title":"Complications of IVF and ovulation induction","volume":"20","author":"Klemetti","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R37-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1265669","article-title":"Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Definition, incidence, and classification","volume":"28","author":"Zivi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"R38-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3456","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der322","article-title":"Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort","volume":"26","author":"van Leeuwen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R39-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: A meta-analysis","volume":"103","author":"Jackson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R40-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.02.041","article-title":"Infertility surgery is dead: Only the obituary remains?","volume":"89","author":"Feinberg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R41-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00661-7","article-title":"Factors affecting the pregnancy rate after microsurgical reversal of tubal ligation","volume":"80","author":"Hanafi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R42-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2013.0057","article-title":"Unilateral laparoscopic tubal reversal versus IVF","volume":"23","author":"\u00c7etin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"R43-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032","article-title":"Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: A committee opinion","volume":"103","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R44-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.02.107","article-title":"The role of fallopian tube anastomosis in training fellows: A survey of current reproductive endocrinology fellows and practitioners","volume":"82","author":"Armstrong","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R45-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2832","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa250","article-title":"20 years of the European IVF-monitoring consortium registry: What have we learned?A comparison with registries from two other regions","volume":"35","author":"De Geyter","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R47-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hox012","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hox012","article-title":"Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: An analysis of 6 million cycles","volume":"2017","author":"Ferraretti","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"R49-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.1.5853.599","article-title":"Fallopian tube surgery for reversal of sterilization","volume":"1","author":"Williams","year":"1973","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"R50-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)41108-8","article-title":"Reconstruction of fallopian tubes in previously sterilized patients","volume":"26","author":"Siegler","year":"1975","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R51-20240830","first-page":"1","article-title":"Recent advances in surgical correction of tubal disease producing infertility","volume":"1","author":"Gomel","year":"1978","journal-title":"Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R52-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-199908000-00007","article-title":"Laparoscopic microsurgery: Current and future status","volume":"11","author":"Koh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R53-20240830","first-page":"375","article-title":"Conventional laparoscopy is the better option for tubal sterilization reversal: A closer look at tubal reanastomosis","volume":"2","author":"Madison","year":"2021","journal-title":"Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)"},{"key":"R54-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00361-0","article-title":"Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: A report on 1,118 cases","volume":"68","author":"Kim","year":"1997","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R55-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2355","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei046","article-title":"Sutureless re-anastomosis by laparoscopy versus microsurgical re-anastomosis by laparotomy for sterilization reversal: A matched cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Wiegerinck","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R56-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.V39N1p22","article-title":"Microsurgical reversal of sterilisation \u2013Is this still clinically relevant today?","volume":"39","author":"Tan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singap"},{"key":"R57-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq326","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors from tubal sterilization reversal by sutureless laparoscopical re-anastomosis: A retrospective cohort study","volume":"26","author":"Schepens","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R58-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.4103\/gmit.gmit_75_22","article-title":"Establish the certification system of gynecologic endoscopists","volume":"11","author":"Lee","year":"2022","journal-title":"Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther"},{"key":"R59-20240830","article-title":"Tubal Reanastomosis for the Woman Who has Her Tubes Ligated for Permanent Contraception. YouTube","author":"Moon"},{"key":"R61-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.08.011","article-title":"Achieving cost-neutrality with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods","volume":"91","author":"Trussell","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/gmit.gmit_43_23","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T18:33:32Z","timestamp":1787769212000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/gmit.gmit_43_23"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/gmit.gmit_43_23","relation":{},"ISSN":["2213-3070","2213-3089"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2213-3070","type":"print"},{"value":"2213-3089","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-03-17","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-08-18","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}